A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
I dispute what I suspect that your probable definition of "malleable" means to you. But, go ahead and define your terms, including any limits that you might expect. Then we can discuss your syllogysm.
P1 Living organisms are malleable. Artificial selection produced this from this in only a few thousand years.
ReplyDeleteP2 Malleability does not stop in the wild.
C Therefore, organisms in the wild change over time.
Which of these do you dispute?
I dispute what I suspect that your probable definition of "malleable" means to you. But, go ahead and define your terms, including any limits that you might expect. Then we can discuss your syllogysm.
ReplyDelete