tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post5915548531043503467..comments2024-03-19T04:19:18.871-05:00Comments on Atheism Analyzed: A Feminist Plan To Reduce The Male Population To 10% or LessUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-2107768699086466812014-08-19T01:53:45.302-05:002014-08-19T01:53:45.302-05:00Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty...<i>Not as slaves, <b>simply as workers performing a duty</b>, in the same way workers today do. <b>Only without the need for monetary reimbursement</b> as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated</i>.<br /><br />In other words,men are to become forced laborers,ie. work aginst your will without pay and under threat of punishment.This feminist has no idea that forced labor is a form of slavery.Phoenixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02173422646774264502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-22040859983885983112014-08-18T22:57:11.484-05:002014-08-18T22:57:11.484-05:00I'll bet I could find some 19th Century Manife...I'll bet I could find some 19th Century Manifest Destiny literature that uses much the same sentiments for the indigenous inhabitants. Didn't they get put on reservations for the good of society? I thought that was racist.<br /><br />Maybe they want to put men into something akin to internment camps?<br /><br />She tries to go out of her way not to use the word slave, but wasn't this this argument of many a slave owner, "Hey, they got three hots and a cot, what more do they need?"<br /><br />This is of course nothing but delusion mental masturbation and feminist wish fulfillment. Does this person really think that the Russians, or the Islam, or China is going to go along with this sorta of nonsensical idea. I mean, if I was a practitioner of Islam, I would hold this screed up as a reason women need to but in Burkhas. I mean, aren't they taken care of?<br /><br />As you said, Stan. Insanity is so easy to find.<br />Rikaloniushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15644243863531863501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-43463500858903905232014-08-18T21:51:30.823-05:002014-08-18T21:51:30.823-05:00These days insanity is easy to find...These days insanity is easy to find...Stanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15754447145433452423noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-24948020443514681322014-08-18T11:08:36.993-05:002014-08-18T11:08:36.993-05:00I got this far, and had more than enough:
"T...I got this far, and had more than enough:<br /><br /><b>"That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death."</b><br /><br />Coupled with her viewpoint that:<br /><br /><b>"The purpose of living is merely to persist and perpetuate our species. If someone is willing to give you all you require to survive and live comfortably, simply because you exist, then you have already achieved all that truly matters."</b><br /><br />If there is no purpose of living other than mere existence, reproduced endlessly, and that is all that truly matters, then on what basis does this person presume to make judgments (for others) that their quality of life would be "drastically improved" by the imposition of her agenda?<br /><br />Perhaps it would be a waste of time to suggest that this person read the Bible Book of Ecclesiastes for a somewhat different perspective on such an "idyllic" life style for men. The Preacher, presumably King Solomon, purportedly the wisest man ever, who had all that the subject desires for all men: and he considered it meaningless, a life not worth living.<br /><br />It does NOT suffice to argue that the wisest of men is still stupider than the stupidest of women - after all, King Solomon managed to create and live in a microcosm of the putative "best of all possible worlds" imagined by the subject. That puts him at least on the same level as her Royal Brilliance.<br /><br />Just a thought: would she be willing to serve the rest of femininity as a concubine for men's pleasure? If not, <b>why not?</b> Her credo declares that mere existence is the <i>sine qua non</i> of living. As long as her material needs are taken care of, on what logical grounds could she complain for being treated as she wishes to treat men? She would already have achieved "all that truly matters." Since she already HAS achieved that minimalist goal (mere existence), WHY IS SHE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE STATUS QUO?<br /><br />Stan, you really do find some choice examples of insanity writ large! The inmates truly are running the asylum!<br />Robert Coblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12427520849707914818noreply@blogger.com