tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post4472284433503211926..comments2024-03-19T04:19:18.871-05:00Comments on Atheism Analyzed: The Theory Of Evolution: Modern SynthesisUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-63009123210199854012015-03-23T10:13:38.279-05:002015-03-23T10:13:38.279-05:00Hello everyone,
It is not just biology, it is phy...Hello everyone,<br /><br />It is not just biology, it is physics -astrophysics, geophysics- too. I just hope a paradigm shift should be about to come.<br /><br />This is an old site, but suppression of the dissent in science is still way too common nowadays.<br /><br />With the sadness in my heart, ironically, I'm so glad I'm not an academic science student.<br /><br /><a href="http://archivefreedom.org/" rel="nofollow">ArchiveFreedom Site</a><br /><br />Kind Regards.yonosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00853519252063461784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6274381712003139086.post-37932245978417934012015-03-20T16:27:11.292-05:002015-03-20T16:27:11.292-05:00"This was necessary in order to counter the t..."This was necessary in order to counter the theory that deep time (gradualism) was an absolute requirement for evolutionary change but which was not a consistent feature of the fossil record."<br /><br />Gradualism over vast amounts of time was a key part of Darwin's theory:<br />"On the other hand, I do believe that natural selection will always act very slowly, often only at long intervals of time, and generally on only a very few of the inhabitants of the same region at the same time. I further believe, that this very slow, intermittent action of natural selection accords perfectly well with what geology tells us of the rate and manner at which the inhabitants of this world have changed."<br /><br />The evolutionists rejected a core principle of evolution, but still maintained Darwin was right. It baffles me.<br /><br />"Evolutionary hypothesis predicts no biological outcomes."<br /><br />Again from Darwin: "But which groups will ultimately prevail, no man can predict; for we well know that many groups, formerly most extensively developed, have now become extinct."<br /><br />So they kept that piece. It makes sense, anything that can't be predicted can predict anything.<br /><br />"Given that the DNA variability under discussion is subtractive, not additive, there is no reason to think that the variations are not just subsets or subspecies of the main, overall species, which still exists."<br /><br />And this is another blow against Darwin's theory. For the first part he keeps insisting that variations selected will out preform the original species, effectively killing them off until only the better adapted new species exists. Since species like the Cichlids exist, this undermines another aspect.<br /><br />"here are distant stars which are just like our star but are at a distant point in their life cycle. The idea of Deep Time, of billions of years, explains so much of the world around us" - Nye<br /><br />Astronomy does not equal biology. Of course, Darwin pull the same stunt: "Natural selection can act only by the preservation and accumulation of infinitesimally small inherited modifications, each profitable to the preserved being; and as modern geology has almost banished such views as the excavation of a great valley by a single diluvial wave, so will natural selection, if it be a true principle, banish the belief of the continued creation of new organic beings, or of any great and sudden modification in their structure." <br /><br />They may have switched to new sheet music, but the song sounds the same.Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06204019386677018162noreply@blogger.com