Atheism Analyzed

A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.

Showing posts with label Probability - Bayesian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Probability - Bayesian. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 14, 2016

An Atheist Inductive Argument Scrutinized

›
A reader asks me to take a look at an Atheist’s probability arguments. It’s taken a few days, sorry. But here it is. First the argument as i...
14 comments:
Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Bayesian Statistics, in the News

›
The NY Times discovers Bayesian Statistical Calculations , and even gives a shout out to the obvious problems with it: "One downside o...
2 comments:
Friday, April 4, 2014

Responding to Jeffrey Jay Lowder's Second Post Regarding My Ignorance and Lack of Knowledge and Integrity.

›
[Note: Be forewarned: this turned out to be very long.] I just realized that given the last Lowder post was called the “third”, there must...
5 comments:
Monday, March 31, 2014

JJ Lowder Again

›
JJ Lowder now says, The accusation is not, “Stan responded neither to the analysis nor the list of empirical evidence; therefore, Stan lie...
6 comments:
Friday, March 28, 2014

What I Learned At Patheos

›
My foray into patheos–land is over. I don’t usually venture into other blogs because they are commonly infested with nasty hangers-on (PZ a...
6 comments:
›
Home
View web version

Contributors

  • Stan
  • Stan
Powered by Blogger.