Monday, February 27, 2017

Proposed Executive Order Allowing Ownership of Scary Guns for Militia Purposes.

I think the entire population of the law abiding USA citizens should be allowed the designation of "Militia; Unorganized", per section 3(a). In fact, I AM A MILITIA. Tell me that I am not - go ahead.
Proposed Executive Order Designating Certain Rifles for ‘Militia Purposes’

Trump Executive Order

The faulty Fourth Circuit decision issued last week upholding Maryland’s Scary Gun Ban runs afoul of good jurisprudence. The ruling found that Second Amendment protections don’t extend to individuals who wish to own certain semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15, calling them, “weapons that are most useful in military service.” However, a document sent to me yesterday offers hope of correcting that in the form of a proposed executive order to be issued by President Trump.

Virginia attorney Lenden Eakin sent me the text of the proposed order and gave permission to share it. I’d like run it past the Armed Intelligentsia here at TTAG to get your take.

The simple mechanism of attorney Eakin’s proposal: by defining certain categories of rifles for militia use, the President could strike state and local bans on many of the most popular “assault rifles” and their magazines.

Mr. Eakin also notes: “An Executive Order like this could have a significant impact on the litigation to challenge Assault Weapons Bans currently making its way through the Courts. It would help the challengers.”

UPDATE: I neglected to note in the original story how this is meant to serve as a stop-gap measure. Ideally, only until a more permanent remedy could be achieved. Or alternatively, until the Supreme Court, with one or more President Trump appointees, could reverse that Fourth Circuit ruling and strike scary gun bans on the whole.

– – – – – – –


By the authority vested in me as President and Commander in Chief of the Militia by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure the ability of citizens of the United States to defend themselves, their communities and their States, as well as to ensure the safety and security of our Nation, I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. Both individual and community safety are critically important to the national security of the United States. Terrorism, transnational criminal activity and potential acts of war by foreign nations present a significant threat to national security and our citizens, who have the right and the duty to defend themselves, their communities, their States and the Nation.

Section 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:

(a) Support and defend the Constitution, including the Second Amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms for Militia purposes,as well asself-defense.

(b) Encourage citizens to be prepared to act as members of the Militia to defend communities, States and the Nation, as part of the common defense contemplated by the Constitution of the United States.

(c) Discourage restrictions by States and political subdivisionson individual possession of firearms suitable for Militia purposes by citizens of the United States.

Section 3. Definitions.

(a) “Militia” has the meaning given the term in Title 10, Section 311 of the United States Code to include the Unorganized Militia, as well as the meaning given to the term “Militia” under equivalent State statutes.

(b) “Self-Defense” shall mean the actions of citizens to defend themselves and their families from physical attack.

(c) “Communities” shall mean neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of citizens who live in distinct geographic areas within a State.

(d) “State” shall mean one of the fifty States of the United States.

(e) “Militia Purposes” shall mean training, practice and preparedness which could improve the ability of a citizen to act,and to be armed in case of a need to act, as a current or future member of a local, State or National organization commanded by government officials and responsive to a physical threat. Appropriate organizations include those commanded by an elected county or city Sheriff; those commanded by the Governor of a State through officers of that State’s Defense Force as authorized by Title 30, Section 109 of the United States Code, or through officers of that State’s National Guard;and organizations commanded by the President through officers of the Active or Reserve components of U.S. Armed Forces.

(f) “Militia Rifles” shall mean the firearms designated in Section 4 that are made in America and suitable for use in self-defense, community defense, defense of States and defense of the Nation.

Section 4. Designation of Militia Rifles. That the following firearms and accessories are authorized and appropriate for individual citizens to keep and bear for Militia purposes under the Constitution and the laws of the United States:

(a) The AR-15 and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, magazines of up to thirty round capacities, M-7 bayonets, and ammunition in 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington, in all quantities.

(b) The M1A and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs,magazines of up to twenty round capacities, M-6 bayonets, and ammunition in 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester, in all quantities.

(c) The M1 Garand and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, M-5 bayonets, and ammunition in.30-’06 Springfield, in all quantities.

(d) Bolt action rifles in the calibers of .30-’06 Springfield; 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester; 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington; or any substantially equivalent caliber, and ammunition appropriate for the rifles, in any quantity.

(This list could be expanded or replaced by a broad definition)

Section 5. Pre-emption. This Executive Order is intended to pre-empt the laws of States or political subdivisions that infringe upon the rights of citizens to keep and bear the arms designated in Section 4.

Section 6. Judicial Notice. That the judges of all State and Federal Courts are hereby given notice that possession of the designated Militia Rifles and accessories by citizens should not be restricted or infringed upon by State laws or the laws of a political subdivision of a State and any such law should be reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard to determine whether it is a violation of the Constitution of the United States after judicial consideration of this Order and the fact that it was issued by the Commander in Chief of the Militia.

Donald J. Trump


March __, 2017

I think "other weapons as required" should be specified, in order to include all weapons required to fight a "well armed" tyranny. And I think voluntary training provided by the military should be made available to any and everyone.

I also think that (re: Israel) all 18 year olds should serve in a military capacity for at least two years, including the physically handicapped who can be found support jobs. That would help cure the nation of snowflakes and weepers. No release for slackers, bums and criminals: military prison, though, as required.

Why Bother Even Talking To Them?

Donna's Brain on Leftism

Brazile: I 'allegedly' sent CNN questions to Clinton team
Took her six months to come up with this excuse.
In an interview with Politico published Monday, Brazile, a former CNN contributor, acknowledged the emails "allegedly" show her passing advantageous information to Clinton's campaign. She said, however, that those emails don't show full context.

"You know, I think there's always a lot of confusion when something is put out in a dump of emails that trickles out," she said. "So, the first answer is an easy answer. Did CNN provide Donna Brazile or any other contributor debate questions? No. I've never received questions from CNN. I've made that very clear, I've made that very plain."

"[T]he emails that were allegedly sent to me or sent from me, you know, told a story but it didn't tell a complete story," she said.
Only a partial story of why she had the questions in advance, and what she did with them.

"Context" took a while to become the excuse.

Savages Make Cars; So Burn Them. Understanding The New Swedish Identity

Savages of Stockholm

Some people would call that savagery, but that sort of talk is politically incorrect. And we all know that there are no such things as savages. The true savages are the people who use scientific principles to make cars and then use the money to commission paintings of soaring eagles for museums because they are greedy exploiters of the planet. On the other hand, the noble savages whose herds of sheep and goats turn fertile land into desert, who burned the great libraries of civilization and who believe that the hair of women emits rays that passing airplanes have to be protected from are close to nature.
The lesson of Sweden is not only lost on the ctrl-Left, it is adamantly denied to even exist. The existence of no-go zones, violence and rape in Sweden was suppressed by the government, which apparently carefully adjudicates the "news" that escapes from the beneficent socialist dictatorship.

The revelation of the importation of terror, crime, and rape into Sweden is not so much a win for Trump (which it is, of course), but a major loss for the narrative of the cntl-Left which loves Islam as if it were its own child. The cntl-Left studiously ignores actual facts, and suppresses all information which shows the objective falsification of the odious Leftist narrative.

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Non-Replicable "Science": Post Truth and Post Empirical

The business of Grants, Prestige, and Falsifiability: Two out of three, anyway.
Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers'
Science is facing a "reproducibility crisis" where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, research suggests.

This is frustrating clinicians and drug developers who want solid foundations of pre-clinical research to build upon.

From his lab at the University of Virginia's Centre for Open Science, immunologist Dr Tim Errington runs The Reproducibility Project, which attempted to repeat the findings reported in five landmark cancer studies.

"The idea here is to take a bunch of experiments and to try and do the exact same thing to see if we can get the same results."

You could be forgiven for thinking that should be easy. Experiments are supposed to be replicable.

The authors should have done it themselves before publication, and all you have to do is read the methods section in the paper and follow the instructions.

Sadly nothing, it seems, could be further from the truth.

After meticulous research involving painstaking attention to detail over several years (the project was launched in 2011), the team was able to confirm only two of the original studies' findings.


According to a survey published in the journal Nature last summer, more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments.

Marcus Munafo is one of them. Now professor of biological psychology at Bristol University, he almost gave up on a career in science when, as a PhD student, he failed to reproduce a textbook study on anxiety.

"I had a crisis of confidence. I thought maybe it's me, maybe I didn't run my study well, maybe I'm not cut out to be a scientist."

The problem, it turned out, was not with Marcus Munafo's science, but with the way the scientific literature had been "tidied up" to present a much clearer, more robust outcome.

"What we see in the published literature is a highly curated version of what's actually happened," he says.

"The trouble is that gives you a rose-tinted view of the evidence because the results that get published tend to be the most interesting, the most exciting, novel, eye-catching, unexpected results.

"What I think of as high-risk, high-return results."

The reproducibility difficulties are not about fraud, according to Dame Ottoline Leyser, director of the Sainsbury Laboratory at the University of Cambridge.

That would be relatively easy to stamp out. Instead, she says: "It's about a culture that promotes impact over substance, flashy findings over the dull, confirmatory work that most of science is about."

She says it's about the funding bodies that want to secure the biggest bang for their bucks, the peer review journals that vie to publish the most exciting breakthroughs, the institutes and universities that measure success in grants won and papers published and the ambition of the researchers themselves.

"Everyone has to take a share of the blame," she argues. "The way the system is set up encourages less than optimal outcomes."
Well, that actually IS fraud. It is fraud which is systemically induced and supported. And that means that the scientists are complicit and the data is fundamentally useless. A giant taxpayer rip-off.

Best Quotes:
"Replication is something scientists should be thinking about before they write the paper," says Ritu Dhand, the editorial director at Nature.
But we need to be bolder, according to the Edinburgh neuroscientist Prof Malcolm Macleod.

"The issue of replication goes to the heart of the scientific process."

"Without efforts to reproduce the findings of others, we don't know if the facts out there actually represent what's happening in biology or not."

Without knowing whether the published scientific literature is built on solid foundations or sand, he argues, we're wasting both time and money.

"It could be that we would be much further forward in terms of developing new cures and treatments. It's a regrettable situation, but I'm afraid that's the situation we find ourselves in."
Today's "science" is on the rocks. You can bet on two things: Whatever is published in science journals is likely to be neither complete nor valid; the last line in the study goes something like this: "more study is needed".

Quick: What's Wrong With This "Logic"?

Desert people evolve to drink water poisoned with deadly arsenic

PEOPLE in a south American desert have evolved to detoxify potentially deadly arsenic that laces their water supply.

For settlers in the Quebrada Camarones region of Chile’s Atacama desert some 7000 years ago, water posed more than a bit of a problem. They were living in the world’s driest non-polar desert, and several of their most readily available water sources, such as rivers and wells, had high levels of arsenic, which can cause a variety of health problems.

1. The people who moved into the region were likely normal humans.
2. The arsenic likely killed off or rendered non-attractive those humans who couldn't handle the Arsenic load.
3. However, some of those people survived, because they weren't as susceptible to arsenic as most.
4. Those people continued to live there and breed.

This is not positive evolution at all, it is negative, an elimination. A portion of the population was removed. There was no organic change, no evolving of anyone at all.

Mutation of a single nucleotide in order to accommodate arsenic is an assertion of directed mutation. That goes directly against evolutionary theory, which accepts no teleological processes whatsoever. Further, there is no indication that the observed mutation actually has anything to do with arsenic.

Declarations of "evolution" are always suspect, especially those that Jump-to-Cause without reason to do so.

Fools Are Rarely Disabused of Their Foolishness: Witch Edition

Double, double, Donald's in trouble: Witches including Lana Del Rey will gather at midnight to cast a spell on President Trump AND his supporters in hopes of banishing him from office

Witches will protest President Donald Trump on Friday at midnight by casting a spell under the crescent moon

The purpose of the binding spell is to stop President Trump from doing harm and banish him from office

Among the objects required to complete this spell are an unflattering photo of Trump, a tiny orange candle, a Tower tarot card and bowls of water and salt

After lighting the small candle that has President Trump's name carved onto it, participants must begin the new chant that was written just for this spell

'I call upon you / To bind / Donald J. Trump / So that he may fail utterly / That he may do no harm/To any human soul,' says the chant

The lyrics also take aim at President Trump's supporters, with the lines: 'Bind them in chains / Bind their tongues / Bind their works / Bind their wickedness'
You would think that they would learn the stupidity of their "religion" by the lack of noticeable results from their pretend sorcery. But they will not, of course.

I'm Backing Ellison - He's a Mainstream Democrat, Right?

Dems fear divisions will persist after DNC chair election
The Donks could use a little Sharia in their party.
Keith Ellison: ‘Blacks don’t have an obligation’ to obey government

The Muslim Brotherhood-linked Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to Congress, also has past ties to the Nation of Islam — a black Islamic supremacist, anti-white, anti-gay, anti-Catholic and virulently anti-Semitic group. He conveniently denounced his involvement with the group when it suited him in 2006, after it became an issue during his first run for Congress.

It would seem that no matter how much hatred Ellison has spewed against the U.S. and Israel, his documented Islamic supremacist ties, and his facilitating of the crudest divisions in racial politics, he is still a trusted and influential Democratic leader, and likely soon to be the Chair of the DNC.

“Keith Ellison Once Said Black People Don’t Have ‘Obligation’ To Obey Government”, by Peter Hassan, The Daily Caller, February 23, 2017:

Democratic congressman and DNC chair front-runner Keith Ellison once said that “black people don’t live in a democracy” and “don’t have an obligation” to obey the government.

Ellison made the comments at a 1992 protest after white police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. At least 63 people died in the racially charged riots following the verdict.

Minnesota newspaper the Star Tribune quotes Ellison as telling a group of protesters in Minneapolis that “Black people do not live under a democracy.”

“You don’t have an obligation to obey a government that considers you to be less than human,” Ellison said.

Ellison, the nation’s first Muslim congressman, has come under fire for his history of making racially inflammatory comments, as well as his past association with notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, whom Ellison has since renounced. (RELATED: Democratic Donor: Keith Ellison ‘Clearly An Anti-Semite’)

Ellison once called for American blacks to have their own nation and called the U.S. Constitution “best evidence of a white racist conspiracy to subjugate other peoples.”

While speaking to an atheist group in 2007, Ellison compared the Sept. 11 attacks to the Reichstag fire, stopping just short of accusing then-President George W. Bush of having a hand in the attacks.

“It’s almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that,” Ellison said of 9/11, according to reports at the time. “After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader [Hitler] of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted.”

Ellison went on to say he wouldn’t suggest the U.S. had a hand in the attacks because “you know, that’s how they put you in the nut-ball box — dismiss you,” before later walking back his comments…

With Only a Few Testosterone Shots, Too

Trinity’s transgender wrestler wins first 2 matches at state meet

CYPRESS - Mack Beggs, the transgender wrestler from Euless Trinity High School, is halfway home to capturing the Class 6A state girls wrestling championship in the 110-pound weight class.


For the most part, Friday’s action was routine despite the sudden swirling controversy around Beggs, whose gender transition from female to male became a news story after the regional tournament.

Remember This...

...whenever you discuss either evolution or Global Government Utopia?
It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on Virginia
3rd president of US (1743 - 1826)
The errors of each are easily listed; they will be dismissed without reasoning or evidence by the AtheoLeft.

Jake Tapper - Whines For No Reason Except Jake Tapper

Friday, February 24, 2017

He's On Your Side


"Salt the Bastards" (WRSA)

Mindlessness of the Class Warriors

Chuckie Loses It

Logic Not Accepted Here

Free Shoot Zone: Closed

Not Quite Right: Donks Have No Bar At All

We're finding out that we will need to jettison our bar as well, as the Donks ramp up the violence of their "moral" outrage.


Milo Yiannopoulos got punished despite having done nothing wrong!

Milo didn’t do what he’s accused of doing — but he’s being punished nevertheless. That’s just wrong . . . and so ickily Leftist.

Wright, on Milo

Milo and the Bookstore

The libels against Milo Yiannopoulos continue, but the still, small voice of truth is speaking also. Those who were deceived innocently at first now have no excuse.

Within hours, an unedited version of the year-old conversation used to libel Milo was available, as were leaks from the press revealing that the attack was deliberate, coordinated, and duplicitous.

If any man looks at the evidence, pro and con, and decides Milo is secretly an advocate for pedophilia rather than a victim of it and a public crusader whose work has put three pedophiles behind bars, I will not argue the point. At least he looked at the evidence.

A man who condemns, sight unseen, a fellow human soul, taking the word of the Fake New media as gospel, that man has let partisanship overmaster his conscience and common sense.

He has joined a mob. He has joined the Two Minute Hate.

A question for my fellow Catholics: when is the last time, on a nationally syndicated program of any kind, you heard a popular voice praising the Catholic Church, or saying she is right about everything?

I can answer for myself: it was Milo, on Bill Maher, and in his speeches in colleges, freely available on the internet.

And before that? I can name no one. I am not old enough to remember Fulton Sheen.

Is he a shameful and terrible spokesman for our beautiful Church? Yes, indeed, I fear he is. When I get to heaven, I will certainly chide Saint Mary Magdalene the whore and St. Matthew the tax-gathering collaborator, wag my finger under their noses, and demand to know why persons of doubtful morals speak up for Christ, embarrassing the righteous and the just.

Or maybe I will certainly not. I am too acutely conscious of my own sins and shortcomings to cast the first stone.

It is true that Milo jokes about homosex in a fashion that makes light of an abomination. But it is not for this that he is on the receiving end of the Two Minute Hate.

It is because he will not bow to the violent and bloodthirsty idol called Political Correctness, who is a jealous goddess, and will have no other gods before her.

Personally, I sincerely hope Milo confesses his sins, repents, and stops offering scandal to the heathens. Based on his public comments, he sincerely hopes so as well.

In the meanwhile, all the usual suspects are reporting, as news, that Milo is over and done. The same story with the same headline allegedly coming from independent stories is propping up an agreed-upon narrative.

Bill Maher is taking bows for having permanently silenced Milo, something paid rioters were not able to do. Ironic, considering he was not involved in the character assassination, but instead gave Milo a boost in the public eye, after he and his guests melted into frothing, foul-mouthed incoherence on camera, combining ‘oaf’ with ‘offal’.

But Mr. Maher’s vaunting is merely one drop in the shower of self-congratulation.

Anyone who has read Vox Day’s grim and insightful SJWs ALWAYS LIE will recognize this ritual at once. After the ritual denunciation of the unperson, the warren gathers together for a ritual triumph, and marches in lockstep around the city thrice, flourishing the effigy of their foe’s severed heads on pikestaffs, pretending victory.

Is it victory? We shall see. Much depends on Milo’s grit, which, in times past, has been admirable, even remarkable.

In the meanwhile, the mock outrage of the artificially generated scandal based on a lie has had the predictable effect of generating more book sales for Milo (and, as it happens, for me).
Be kind: Give him a HIT.



Chris Cuomo: If a 12-Year-Old Girl Doesn’t Want to See a Penis In the Locker Room, That’s Either Because of Her “Overprotective Dad” or Her Own Lack of “Tolerance.”
Ed Driscoll
Oh YES! Tolerance Card played in desperation. Rationality not required at CNN

So Many Trump Wins..

AFL-CIO cutting staff as union membership declines

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics union membership hit an all-time low in 2016 of just 10.7 percent. That decline has consequences for unions like the AFL-CIO, which Bloomberg reports is dismissing dozens of staff members...

AFL-CIO is not the only union to downsize since Trump was elected. In December the SEIU announced it was planning for 30% budget cuts.

And this from InstaPundit:
If unions provided value, people would pay dues voluntarily.
Maybe people are putting that cash into the stock market, instead of union bosses pockets.

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Old Video: Bill Maher Justifies Pedophilia: Audio AND George Takei on His Own Child Molestation (scary and delicious)

Go to 2:20 if you are time impaired:

Donk Double-Talk


That appears to be changing. Progressivism, the civic religion of the North, has degraded into a lunatic cult and marginalized itself. The leaders still control the high ground, but they are under assault. Buckley conservatism, which has served as the ideological enforcers for the Left, is imploding. These people may not be packing their bags, preparing for exile, but the 2016 election map makes clear that the old Yankee hegemony is coming to an end. The sensibilities of the rest of the country will have to be included in the political culture.

Now, it is possible that Progressivism is on its death bed. Unlike Europe, the American Left has never been about economic equality. It was always about spiritual equality. The radicals on the Continent were always obsessed with busting up the class structure. The radicals in American have always been focused on saving the immortal soul of the nation. Economic equality was never anything more than a a political tool for the reformers to use as a way to get control of the culture in order to impose their moral vision on the nation.

In order for this to work, the Left has always needed victims and oppressors, saints and sinners. In the 20th century, they could champion black civil rights and women’s issues. Then it was onto gays and now foreigners. The trouble is, they are running out of victims to champion. Black guys getting pushed around by rednecks at the polling booth make for sympathetic victims. Mentally unstable men in sundresses wanting access to the girl’s toilet are not good victims. They are ridiculous and championing them makes the champions look ridiculous.

There’s also a noticeable lack of villains. Donald Trump is supposed to be the 12th invisible Hitler, returning to impose a dictatorship on America. The trouble is, Trump sounds like a Jewish guy from Queens and his kids converted to Judaism when they got married. So far, his most enthusiastic supporter among world leaders is the Prime Minister of Israel. They ain’t making Hitlers like they used to. This comes after the nation twice elected a black guy president. The unhinged hatred of white people that has carried the Left for generations has descended into madness.

Something else that is working against the Yankee hegemony is the collapse of the blank slate. Progressivism rests on the assertion that people come into the world as an amorphous blob that can be shaped and trained to be anything. That means a just society has virtuous people at the top to make sure the citizens are properly shaped and trained. This imperative has always been the source of authority for the American Left and now it is unraveling as science unlocks the human genome.

It is impossible to overestimate the impact of genetics on moral philosophy as everything about Western culture depends on free will. Democracy assumes that all people are equally capable of participating in the civic life of a people. While most people have always sensed that this is not true, scientific proof that it is not true changes everything. You cannot have egalitarianism and multiculturalism without assuming humans come into the world as a blank slate. If people are not endlessly malleable, there’s no point in trying to mold them.

Long term trends like these do not change overnight so this great confluence of events may play out over generations. It could turn out that the natural order is for the North to dominate the political life of the nation. Genetics could find the “free will” gene and validate everything Progressives have claimed for generations. It is impossible to know, but it is not the way things are heading. Right now it feels like three great trends in American cultural life are coming to a conclusion at roughly the same point.

Stumped: Why We Are Confused

Just not enough data, so I guess... It's gotta be Trump's fault.
From over the transom:

I’m confused.
Are you confused?
Are they confused?
Is our Media confused?
Are our Politicians confused?


Let’s see… do I understand this thing correctly?

The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims

*** THINK OF IT: ***

Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem


Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem


They’re not happy in Gaza
They’re not happy in Egypt
They’re not happy in Libya
They’re not happy in Morocco
They’re not happy in Iran
They’re not happy in Iraq
They’re not happy in Yemen
They’re not happy in Afghanistan
They’re not happy in Pakistan
They’re not happy in Syria
They’re not happy in Lebanon
They’re not happy in Nigeria
They’re not happy in Kenya
They’re not happy in Sudan


They’re happy in Australia
They’re happy in England
They’re happy in Belgium
They’re happy in France
They’re happy in Italy
They’re happy in Germany
They’re happy in Sweden
They’re happy in the USA & Canada
They’re happy in Norway & India

They’re happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

And who do they blame? Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves.



I’m completely stumped…
Any idea who might be causing the problem?
The protesters say it’s Trump.

Yeah, Me Too...

Le Pen: Principles

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Milo, on Milo

Success At Last!

Have a beer and go back to leaking lies, OK?


Prerogatives of Socialist Equality


Fake News

Gitcher Protest Stuff Racheer

Enemy of the People

Edited Videos

It turns out that the accusations against Milo were constructed from chunks of video taken out of context and edited into a form for the Left to use to rile up and split the conservative base.

The conservatives are known for their circular firing squads, and this one formed up pronto.

Milo is not a pedophile; he investigates and outs pedophiles.

The Left, on the other hand, rewards those who advocate for pedophilia and/or admit to pedophilia - Salon, Meryl Streep, Whoopi Goldberg, Lena Dunham, Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, the entire cast of Comet Ping Pong Pizza and Epstein's Pedophile Island including Clintons and who knows how many other wealthy Leftists. Clinton's (both of them) trips to Pedophile Island didn't make even a blip in her support in the presidential election. Pedophilia is NOT a moral problem for the Left.

But even non-valid charges of pedophilia are punished by the conservatives, especially those who want to split the Right - Remember the Never Trumpers... The Right still needs to purge the Never Trumpers and those determined to dislodge the elected president and violate the constitution (RINOs like McCain). So don't be surprised at other attacks by false videos, false "security" leaks, or whatever they come up with next.

The Leftist outrage is NOT going to stop.

The Left Compensates For Black Inabilities

Bad Medicine

I’ve previously mentioned the taxpayer-funded race hustler Dr Caprice Hollins, whose efforts to empower black Seattle school pupils include dismissing grammar and foresight as “white values” and expectations thereof as “cultural racism.” Rather than encouraging “students of colour” to articulate their thoughts, to be responsible and plan ahead, like everyone else, we must, says Dr Hollins, see people as “racial beings” and “teach [children] to view the world through a racial lens.” But we mustn’t correct their grammar and spelling, or expect them to turn up on time.

Similar sentiments were voiced, in a somewhat boggling way, by Dr Riyad A Shahjahan, a professional educator at Michigan State University and a “social justice theorist,” who wants us to believe that people with brown skin are mystical and exotic, akin to leprechauns, and, unlike white people, “inhabit [their] bodies fully.” Dr Shahjahan also denounces expectations of attentiveness and academic competence, and even punctuality, as racist and oppressive. We should, he says, embrace “embodied pedagogy” and “disrupt Eurocentric notions of time.”

With such deep and incontestable thinking in mind, it may not be surprising to learn that the Writing Centre at the University of Washington, Tacoma is exploring similar avenues. The Centre, the stated goal of which is to “help writers write and succeed in a racist society,” aims to improve the life chances of brown-skinned students by encouraging them to give employers the impression that they’re incapable of mastering even rudimentary grammar:
An “antiracist” poster in a college writing centre insists American grammar is “racist” and an “unjust language structure,” promising to prioritise rhetoric over “grammatical ‘correctness.’” The poster, written by the director, staff, and tutors of the Writing Centre, states, “racism is the normal condition of things,” declaring that it permeates rules, systems, expectations, in courses, school and society… The Centre pledges to “listen and look carefully and compassionately for ways we may unintentionally perpetuate racism or social injustice, actively engaging in antiracist practices.” “We promise to emphasise the importance of rhetorical situations… in the production of texts,” announces the poster. “We promise to challenge conventional word choices and writing explanations.
The Writing Centre press release - which, according to one of its authors, Dr Asao Inoue, took “over a year” to write, despite its brevity – tells us that language is “constantly changing” and it is therefore, allegedly, “difficult to justify placing people in hierarchies or restricting opportunities and privileges because of the way people communicate.” Instead of becoming proficient in the structure and expressive possibilities of the national tongue, students – brown ones – should “become more critical” of “unjust language structures.” Apparently, the way for minority students to flourish as writers is to dismiss any criticism of their prose, and any attempt to improve it, as a racially motivated “microaggression” and an “oppressive practice,” and thus proof of “an inherently racist society.”

In short, then, students with brown skin needn’t be articulate, verbally self-possessed, or precise in their thoughts. And that ungrammatical job application, the one enlivened with incomprehensible sentences and lots of inventive spelling, will do just fine.
The Democrats and Left actively works to prevent the assimilation of minorities - especially blacks who they have oppressed for nearly 200 years. This "education" philosophy is, by its design, effectively pretending to educate blacks, but in fact celebrating their ignorance and "inabilities" in a manner which leaves only the ghetto as their future option.

Here, again, is a key statement: “difficult to justify placing people in hierarchies or restricting opportunities and privileges because of the way people communicate.” So in other words, when blacks can't communicate in any meaningful, precise manner, they still should get great jobs. Because that can't happen, it won't. Blacks subjected to this fake educational abuse will not succeed in western society, even with a fake college degree.

Victim Blaming

Milo did NOT say he was a pedophile. He said he was a victim of pedophilia, and yet he apparently accepted part of the blame. By saying that the situation was complex he admitted that, as a child, his behavior was confused, confusing, perhaps even sexual in nature. We don't know what happened.

Milo's Unpardonable Sin was to discuss it at all. The affect of pedophilia on the victim apparently may not be discussed.

I seriously hope that Milo regains his composure and fights back. The despicable shrieking field marshals of the Left have been circling him for a very long time, looking for the slightest crack in his seemingly impregnable persona. The false attack on pedophilia which does not exist in Milo (who outed at least three pedophiles, himself) has allowed them to point, scream, and to influence those who fear the pointing and screaming to run away and abandon him.

This entire display of Shrieking Virtue Signaling is obscene, especially being based purely on Victim Blaming. The onerous behavior of the "Conservatives" is especially vile.

We will find out whether the point-and-shriek offense is still effective enough to destroy their victim.

Personally, I support Milo.