Stupidity Never Sleeps

Arab DNC [Democrat National Committee] Leader Denounces Rachael Ray's 'Cultural Genocide' in Calling Food 'Israeli'

Zogby jumped into the fray, declaring, "Damn it Rachael Ray. This is cultural genocide. It's not Israeli food. It's Arab (Lebanese, Palestinian, Syrian, Jordanian). First the Israelis take the land & ethnically cleanse it of Arabs. Now they take their food & culture & claim it's theirs too! Shame."

Given that Israel has a substantial population of Arabs (25%), how many Democrat lies can we count in the Zogby rant, above?

The Left and Its Anti-Semites.

By its very actions the Left opposes Jews and Judaism at every turn. From the BDM attempt to dis-invest in Israel to the fatuous love affair with Islam, including the Palestinian terrorist state-less state, anything to injure either Israel or individual Jews is fair game to the Left.

This sort of prejudice is a common feature of the Left, because it gathers their hate into a focal point. A century ago the focus was on blacks, who were hangable for looking at a white woman. That was before the Left found the Marxist solution: tribalize people into classes - some into Victimhood Classes and some into the Class To Be Hated.

Jews have always been allocated into the Class To Be Hated; even secular Jews joined into that effort and became Leftists.

The Leftist love for Islam is based in their compatibility with both Islamic Anti-Semitism and with the totalitarianism of Islamic regimes. This love affair renders as orphans the previous stars of Leftist Victimhood: Women, Homosexuals, ghetto blacks - all of whom are endangered by the Islamic world. Victimhood obviously exists only so long as its usefulness exists; then it is ignored and submerged by new Victimhood classes, even if the new classes threaten the older classes with extinction.

Even the Leftist concepts of freedom - free sex of any nature (including sex with nature), total egalitarianism, free equal outcomes, freedom from religion, freedom to change the rules without notice - all this Leftist Marxism is threatened by Islam. But no matter. Islam is both Anti-western and Anti-Semitic, and that is what counts in this portion of the Leftist Progress toward Marxist Utopia.

Project for those so inclined: Ask a Leftist, "What is this Utopia that Leftists want to create? How does that comport with human nature? Most importantly why do you want it - what is in it for you?"

Lesson here: Do NOT Report on Leftist Anti-Semitic Acts.

Award-Winning Journalist Who Broke Story of Jewish Women Barred From Chicago ‘Dyke March’ Removed From Reporting Duties

Chicago Dykes take their anti-semitism seriously.

What Has Been Lost By The Left, In a Single Picture

Criminally Stupid

More Leftist Internal Contradictions

Democrat Who Compared Jews To ‘Termites’ Says Trump Is Too Polarizing
The same Democratic lawmaker also fretted during a congressional hearing that the island of Guam might "tip over" if too many people visited it.


A Frail Looking Hillary Hits Trump for Calling NYC Attack ‘Bombings’ — After Doing the Same
‘I’ve been briefed about the bombings in New York and New Jersey’

Leftism Is Never Without Internal Contradiction: "Intersectionality" Creates Anti-Semitism

In the safe spaces on campus, no Jews allowed

There is no intersection between Palestinians and Jews. So which ones are the losers? Jews of course.

It's very common for the Left. White feminists vs. black feminists; feminists vs female trannies; all Leftists vs Asians; White self-hate; blacks dressed in jeans and tee shirts and crew cuts claiming that tolerance is intolerable cultural appropriation, etc. False ideology can't help but create non-coherent "truth" claims, and class war. That's the entire purpose.

I disagree...

...with calls to dismiss this person.

Oberlin Leaders Denounce Professor’s Remarks as ‘Anti-Semitic’

Oberlin College’s governing body has denounced as “anti-Semitic and abhorrent” social media posts by a professor that included suggestions Israeli and United States intelligence services were behind terror attacks.

The board of trustees called on the private liberal arts institution in Ohio to conduct a review and report back to it for possible action in the wake of Facebook posts by Joy Karega, a professor in the rhetoric and composition department.

“These grave issues must be considered expeditiously,” Clyde S. McGregor, the board chairman, said in a statement March 5 after a quarterly meeting. “In consultation with President Marvin Krislov, the board has asked the administration and faculty to challenge the assertion that there is any justification for these repugnant postings and to report back to the Board.”

The board’s statement took a stronger stance than the college’s initial reaction to the posts by Dr. Karega, after The Tower, a media organization that reports on Israel and the rest of the Middle East, published on Feb. 25 screenshots of some of her postings from 2015. In them, she referred to the Islamic State group, also known as ISIS, as a “C.I.A. and Mossad organization” — a reference to the Israeli intelligence service — and suggested that Mossad had orchestrated the devastating attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

A day after the Tower report was published, Oberlin said that it “respects the rights of its faculty, students, staff and alumni to express their personal views,” but that Dr. Karega’s statements did not represent the college’s views.

Then, on March 4, the college published another statement, saying that its president, Mr. Krislov, had met with representatives of Jewish organizations.

“In a welcoming atmosphere, we discussed, openly and candidly, the potential implications of a professor’s personal views on classroom activity and student intimidation,” the statement said. “We also discussed our shared respect for academic freedom.”

Dr. Karega, who is teaching social justice writing courses this semester and does not have tenure, did not immediately reply to messages or return a telephone call seeking comment on Monday.

But on March 5, the same day that the board’s statement was published, she said in a Facebook post that she would no longer speak publicly about her situation at Oberlin.

she should be challenged to show real evidence to support her charges. If she cannot, then she should be revealed as a fraud. She should not be fired, primarily because her defense of Free Speech is perfectly valid. Firing for unwanted speech is the tactic of SJWs. This SJW should merely be shown to be a fraud, and allowed to see her class enrollment shrink to zero, and then re-assigned to grounds maintenance or some-such. The stigma and stench of fraud should stick to her, and her antisemitism forgotten just as is she.

Jews, and Black Female AntiSemite: Guess Which One Is Not A Protected Class?

'Free speech should flourish': Jewish head of Oberlin college defends his decision not to sack female professor who claimed Jews were behind 9/11 attacks

Joy Karega is a professor of 'rhetoric and composition' at Oberlin College

She allegedly said Jews are responsible for the Charlie Hebdo massacre

The president of Oberlin College President Marvin Krislov is defending Karega's free speech despite being Jewish and offended by her comments

Karega called ISIS a 'CIA and Mossad' operation, referring to Israel's national intelligence agency

However, the college said Karega has a right to express 'personal views'

Suddenly free speech emerges from the intellectual darkness, into the even intellectually darker darkness.

MORE: Can't Make This Up

UWM says 'politically correct' is no longer politically correct

The phrase 'politically correct' is now a microaggression according to the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

The university’s 'Just Words' campaign aims to 'raise awareness of microaggressions and their impact.'

These microaggressions include the words: 'lame,' 'thug,' 'trash,' and 'third world.'

But hate tweets about Jews and Republicans are "IN":

"Interestingly enough, while the university’s Inclusive Excellence Center has labeled several common-use adjectives harmful, the man running the campaign, Warren Scherer, the director of the university’s Inclusive Excellence Center, has taken to Twitter to express his displeasure with Republican presidential candidates in a non-inclusive manner.

Scherer tweeted “fuck every fiber of your being” to Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee and also accused him of “pandering to Republican Jews.” Scherer, who identifies himself as an UWM employee on his twitter profile, also accused presidential candidate Rand Paul of courting “rich Jews.”"

One must have the proper enemies: Jews, Republicans, Jews, oil companies, Jews, Israel, did I mention Jews? That's all Politically Correct... oops I said the censored words... I feel like lame, third world trash... oops again.

Anti-Semitism and Leftist Class Warfare

The western AtheoLeftist Class Warriors are denying that anti-Semitism even exists. This author lists five stages of class war against Jews, and his summary paragraph, below, I have separated into an itemized list:

"When deBoer implies that anti-Semitism is not increasing in Europe and that the real problem is Islamophobia, he ties all of these threads together.

(a)Muslims, people of color, can’t be racist, at least not in any coherent and self-sustaining way;

(b)they are an oppressed people reacting to the depredations of Jews and other whites.

(c)Irrationalist movements that are powered by Jew-hatred don’t exist anymore; that sort of thing was the preserve of white people 70 years ago.

(d)Anti-Semitism today is embraced most frequently and fervently by people of color—but to note that is “the basic logic of bigotry,” blaming the victim while aggrandizing the powerful.

(e)As Chomsky put it himself, “Anti-Semitism is no longer a problem, fortunately. It’s raised, but it’s raised because privileged people want to make sure they have total control, not just 98 percent control.”"

So, any hatred against Jews is because Jews or the West caused the hatred to be deserved. Being a deserved hatred, it is not actually hate, it is justifiable moral indignance at not getting what they want (well documented to be total annihilation of Jews/Israel). This involves the protected Victimhood Class which by definition cannot be racist or hate, the designated Oppressor Class which by definition must be hated, and whatever the Protected Victimhood Class does to the Oppressor Class is deserved by the Oppressor Class, purely because they are designated by definition as the Oppressor Class. In other words, it is an ideology of Classist Hatred which installs hatred and violence as part of its principles.

These class distinctions become rule-bound caricatures which are Leftist-enforced dictation of what (their view of) reality is, viewed strictly and only through the lens of Classist Warfare. There is no other reality for them. Given their dictation of the character of reality, plus their presumption of being messiahs and elites, they are thus morally obliged to force their dictates onto the Oppressor Class, first by condemnations of the simplest self-defense by the Oppressor Class, and progressing from there to excusing bloody assault on the Oppressor Class as justifiable. Further, it is "bigotry" to object to such justifiable bloody assaults because those defined as entitled are also by definition racist and thus deserving of what they get.

The Leftist War On Israel and Jews Is In The Open

US Accuses Israel of Spying

Israel is left out in the cold by US negotiations that will affect the survival of Israel at the hand of Iran. The US government is the bad actor here.

Dem Rep Rips Breitbart Editor as ‘Orthodox’ Jew at Anti-Israel Convention

The J Street Conference is anything BUT what it advertises itself; it is Leftist anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian-PA/Hamas. It's odd that so many Jews hate Israel, and want what the Palestinians want: The Palestinians want ALL of Israel, and they are not bashful about saying so. They have refused statehood several times in the past, because they want Israel, free of Jews, for themselves. "J Street" consists of the Palestinian's useful idiots.

Simon, On Bibi

Bibi’s Speech—The Real Fallout

"But you know he did a good job because some desperate Democratic backbencher from Kentucky named John Yarmuth got all incensed in his post-speech statement (no, he didn’t attend), accusing Bibi of being like a kid at Disneyland trying to get everything he wants, including extra ice cream. Obviously Yarmuth (a former Republican and a Jew — go figure) missed the key point. Obama and Kerry already were about to give the Iranians everything they want.

Well, not quite. Because when you give the Iranians everything they want, they just want more. And, lo and behold, in the midst of the uproar over Netanyahu’s speech, along comes none other than Iran’s Foreign Minister Zarif to set matters straight:

MONTREUX, Switzerland (Reuters) – Iran rejected on Tuesday as “unacceptable” U.S. President Barack Obama’s demand that it freeze sensitive nuclear activities for at least 10 years but said it would continue talks on a deal, Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency reported.

Iran laid out the position as the U.S. and Iranian foreign ministers met for a second day of negotiations and as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a stinging critique of the agreement they are trying to hammer out.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met a day after Obama told Reuters that Iran must commit to a verifiable halt of at least 10 years on sensitive nuclear work for a landmark atomic deal to be reached.”Iran will not accept excessive and illogical demands,” Zarif was quoted by Fars as saying.

So, in other words, the ten-year sunset clause that many of us thought should be an horrendous non-starter, is not enough for the Iranians — who, of course, will continue to negotiate, probably until 2035, assuming they haven’t blown up half the globe by then.

There you have it — the perfect signal the Iranians aren’t really interested in a deal but wish to continue to play the Obama administration for suckers on into oblivion. Who could have predicted that? Well, a lot of people, including yours truly, the day before yesterday — and I don’t speak a word of Farsi."

Obama got all pissy about Netanyahu possibly revealing "secret" negotiations when in fact both he, himself, and the Iranian Foreign minister had already done so, directly to the media. What Obama actually wanted obviously was to tamp down that knowledge of his appeasement of Islamic state terrorism in the national MSM, so that the Left's low information voters didn't hear about it. Well, that AND to attempt to marginalize the leader of Israel.

Leftists Go Full Force Raging Anti-Semitism on Netanyahu.

Wow! Democrats LASH OUT at Netanyahu, Tell Him to Go Home, Call Him “a Child”

The Left goes into foaming rant mode, resembling full-bore metal jacket anti-Semitism at its heyday... and maybe its heyday is returning as the Left stampedes to punish Israel for existing. So much hate. See video at the source.

The hatred and disrespect for Israel has been brought erupting to the surface by the terror that Netanyahu strikes into the cowardly hearts of the Left: the fear that Americans will realize that Netanyahu is right - Israel is being sold out by the appeasement of Iran. Negotiating with terrorists who declare their intent to annihilate an ally is well beyond folly. It is betrayal.

All the bleating of the Left to preserve the SECRET talks from being revealed to the western world smacks of a railroad to treasonous capitulation to Islamic, hegemonic, murderous barbarians with whom the Left is now inexplicably in love.

If Obama will not lawfully manage the US borders, he also will not protect anyone from Iran and its atomic bombs. That's the only plausible reason to keep the Iran deal secret. And revealing this secret betrayal of Netanyahu and Israel is the reason for their hysteria.

Obama Saves Iran From Israel

Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike

"The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran's nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Following Obama's threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.

According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel's back."

If there's any doubt left in any dark corner of your mind regarding the deeply inherent evil in Barack Obama, this should do the trick to light it up. It is proof that Obama wants Iran to have the bomb, at the expense of Israel's existence. It is proof that Obama will bully our western allies in favor of his eastern pals. It is proof of Obama's (and his administration's) anti-semitism.

No wonder Obama has soiled his pants over Bibi's upcoming speech. I wish I had netspan so I could watch it. I expect Democrats to boycott, heckle, or walk out - anything in their attempt to stop or embarrass the leader of the only free country in the middle east.

Obama's Preemptive Attack on Israel's Leader: Official Antisemitism

White House Offers Rebuttal Before Netanyahu’s Speech

"Just four days before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to a joint meeting of Congress, the Obama administration sought on Friday to refute the Israeli leader’s expected critique, arguing that he has failed to present a feasible alternative to American proposals for constraining Iran’s nuclear program.

In a briefing for reporters, senior administration officials contended that even an imperfect agreement that kept Iran’s nuclear efforts frozen for an extended period was preferable to a breakdown in talks that could allow the leadership in Tehran unfettered ability to produce enriched uranium and plutonium.

“The alternative to not having a deal is losing inspections,” said one senior official, who would not be quoted by name under conditions that the administration set for the briefing, “and an Iran ever closer to having the fissile material to manufacture a weapon.”

No. False. The alternative is to destroy the facilities. They are an avowed enemy who has openly declared their intent to destroy Israel and the Great Satan, the USA. This is mere appeasement, and will not work as anyone who has read any actual history knows. No one in the administration cares what will happen to Israel after Iran gets the bomb. Nor do they care what happens to the USA, apparently, as they march toward its destruction.

It's interesting to see Obama eviscerate US military, the economy, and foreign influence, while rapidly increasing control of US internal affairs by reducing freedoms virtually daily. He said before his first election that he favored positive rights, which means that the population gets only those rights which are specifically stated as rights by the government. And that is nearly here and would take only a little tumble from his pen in the direction of "security" and "hate thought".

Congress is now trivial; it is controlled by cowardly Bosses in both chambers, an unintended consequence of non-constitutional house and senate "rules" and "leaders". Even so, it has been completely neutered by Obama's challenge to veto any attempt to control him. The dictatorship is now blatantly out in the open, and without a coup, will not be stopped.

The fault lies in the culture, which has been corrupted over generations - generations which have been stabilized in their ignorance and self-righteous entitlement. That's how Obama got elected; that's how the Democrats still own enough of the government to stop impeachment. The very fabric of the nation, starting with its minds and moral sense, has been divested and self-righteous totalitarianism has been installed as the new Social Justice.

Related:

Anti-Israel divestment push gains traction at US colleges

Anti-semitism and Islamophilia are no accidents. Actual hate is supported; faux "hate thought" is illegal.

Bill Nye: Psycho? Or Just Immature?

Here's what Bill Nye thinks will solve the antisemitism problem in Europe:

Bill Nye's Solution For Jews In Europe: "Get To Know Your Neighbors" Better; Israel "Not Their Home"

See, it's the Jews' fault for not getting cozy with the Muslims. Muslims are SO open to that, you know.

Free Speech For Anti-Semites Screaming "Intafada"; Jail For Pro-Israel Demonstrators

Many campuses are now known to be deeply infected with "Jew Hatred". Leftist professors have formed into groups attempting to divest university involvement with Israel. Students now are fully engaged in anti-Semitic activism to the point of genocidal ranting, and the University of California at Davis is so embroiled:

"While Israel’s campus enemies at UC Davis and elsewhere feel free to speak against it in the most destructive and venomous way possible, as occurred last week, at the same time, pro-Israel, anti-terrorism voices are marginalized, disregarded, shouted down, or denounced as hate speech, unworthy of being part of an ongoing, vigorous debate, and deserving only of being punished and silenced by those who want only one side of the debate to be heard in what should be a vigorous, thoughtful debate in the ‘marketplace of ideas.’

That clearly was the very motivation for the 2013 resolution passed by the ASUCD Senate, Senate Resolution 21, which sought to condemn and identify what supporters term “Islamophobic” speech at UC Davis. The resolution, which was passed after a controversial Ayn Rand Society event on radical Islam, “Islamists Rising,” was held, defined Islamophobia as “the irrational fear of Islam, Muslims or anything related to the Islamic or Arab cultures and traditions.” The authors of the resolution wished to use the resolution to suppress speech by critics of radical Islam, and were successful in categorizing any view about Islam with which they did not agree to be outside the bounds of acceptable speech; in fact, it was henceforth categorized as “hate speech” and unwelcomed on campus. Presumably, criticizing the genocidal charter of Islamic Hamas, or condemning the group’s unending attacks on Israeli civilians for the purpose of murdering Jews, could thereby be considered a type of hate speech, Islamophobic, or contrary to the accepted values of the UC Davis campus.

Obviously, last week’s successful resolution vote signaled to many pro-Palestinian students that not only did they no longer have to apologize for Islamic terror, they could proudly, and publicly, swear allegiance to Hamas while screaming “Allah Akbar” at Jewish students during the divestment vote (a phrase which, among others, the 9/11 hijackers screamed moments before their jets crashed into the twin towers).

The toxic situation at UC Davis has been simmering for some time now, with anti-Israel activists increasingly taking steps to promote their own noxious agenda while simultaneously attempting to suppress or neutralize the speech of other pro-Israel individuals on campus. During a 2012 event at UC Davis, for example, two Israelis –a Jewish man and a Druze woman—were scheduled to speak but their appearance was effectively shut down by members of Students for Justice in Palestine and others who had decided, in advance, that “Events like these are not welcome on our campus anymore.”

What type of events would no longer be allowed? Presumably, any event which offered a platform for defending Israel or offers an alternative view of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict offered by pro-Palestinian activists. And, clearly, this 2012 event did not pass the ideological litmus test: during the presentation, a protestor used the “heckler’s veto” to silence the speakers, standing up and screaming to the podium that Israel has “turned the land of Pales­tine into a land of pros­ti­tutes and rapists and child moles­ters,” and ask­ing the speaker, “How many women have you raped? How many chil­dren have you raped? You are a child moles­ter.”

And pro-Palestinian activists on the Davis campus obviously were not concerned about civility when three Jewish students tried to speak on behalf of Israel at UC Davis at a November 2012 protest against Israel’s Operation Pillar of Defense. The Jewish students were first shouted down with chants of “Leave our space!” “Shame on you!” “F**k Israel,” and “Long live the Intifada!” and then forced against a wall of windows while angry protestors threatened them with closed fists and physical aggression. When pro-Palestinian activists shout “Long live the intifada,” it is, of course, a grotesque and murderous reference to the Second Intifada, during which Arab terrorists murdered some 1000 Israelis and wounded more than 14,000 others, so the fact that this is what passes as intellectual debate about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict on campus is clear evidence that any hope of rational discourse or productive discussion has vanished. Civility has devolved into acrimony, and one can reasonably wonder, based on their language, what the true intentions are of those who defame, demean, and libel Israel in their effort to promote Palestinian self-affirmation."

There is no atrocity that if performed by Hamas would draw criticism from campus Leftists. There is no amount of self-control followed by necessary actions for survival that will not be called "atrocity" by these same people. The hatred runs so deep in both Islamicists and Leftists that there remains no rational plane on which to communicate or relate to them.

The universities, being Leftist, harbor blind hatred for the same cultures and classes that the Islamicists hate: all cultures and classes that are reflective of western values. If you wish your child to hate those cultures and classes, then by all means send him or her to UC Davis or any of the other major Leftist schools. There they will find that there is no Truth, except that it is True that hating western values is a moral essential, and that it is True that dissent cannot be tolerated in order to have a tolerant campus population. And those Truths will be enforced in the name of equality and multiculturalism.

The Naked Messiah

A Class Warrior reveals it all right down to the prison sentences for the Oppressor Class. Here's a sample of this hate monger's list of purges which are necessary in the USA:

"In order to establish ourselves as a country that sincerely respects fundamental human rights, democratic freedoms, and individual liberties, America needs to pass basic human rights legislation – such as a Human Rights Act – that outlaws, among other things:

1. Speech which offends, insults, demeans, threatens, disrespects, discriminates against, and/or incites hatred or violence against a person or a group of people based on their race, gender, age, ethnicity, color, nationality, religion, sexual orientation or sexual activity, gender identity or gender expression, disability, language, language ability, ideology or opinion, social class, occupation, appearance (height, weight, hair color, etc.), mental capacity, and/or any other comparable distinction. In cases where hate speech is aggravated – such as incitement to genocide – prison sentences should be even longer.

2.The spreading of misinformation, including climate change denial, denial of war crimes and genocides (especially Holocaust denial), conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine propaganda, and general nonsense.

3.Anti-feminist, anti-multicultural, anti-immigration, and/or anti-equality ideology.

4.Insulting, disrespectful, and/or offensive speech in general and speech that violates the dignity of people. This would include, for example, jokes about tragedies along with insults and derogatory/disrespectful comments about any person, group, place, or thing.

5.Speech that disparages the memory of deceased persons.

6.Speech that voices approval of oppressive, anti-freedom, anti-democratic, and/or totalitarian ideologies. This would include, for example, speech that opposes a woman’s right to have an abortion and speech that approves of Israeli apartheid in Palestine."

Yes there's more. But this is plenty. Do not disrespect places, things, or criticize the deceased (Hitler?), or the Left's sacrosanct kill machine, abortion, or feminism, or etc. unless you want some serious prison time.

By codifying AtheoLeftism as untouchable by criticism, the totalitarianism is complete. In fact, this entire article is work of elitist hatred and hate mongering against dissent of any and all types. Apparently there is no longer any need to conceal the Leftist desire to eradicate the Other altogether; it is only necessary to get off of the couch and do it.

It is clear that the tolerant Leftist Utopia includes only those who think exactly same: just like this Leftist does.

"Speech that opposes any human rights. This would mean that anyone saying that hate speech shouldn’t be against the law would be prosecuted, since hate speech is universally recognized as an injustice and a human rights violation. It would also include propaganda for war, which is illegal under international human rights law."

Perfect example: dissent is quashed as hate.

But there is hope for the offender:

"Anyone guilty of hate speech – which should carry criminal penalties of 25 years to life – should be sent to special prisons designed to re-educate them and to instill values of tolerance, freedom, democracy, and human rights in them. "

Yes, that's right: she said, "tolerance, freedom, democracy, and human rights", without cracking a figurative smile.

But it is also clear that she can be eliminated herself, under these rules, being a hate speaker in spades. In the end, the Left always eats its own, and she violates most of her own hate-thought laws. Sooner or later, the Left's hate will find her, too. Trotsky could attest to that, if it weren't for the icepick in the back of his brain.

Obama Administration Calls Bibi a Chickenshit (Updated)

The difference between Obama and Netanyahu could not be more polar opposite. Obama got where he is because he is a liar - a black liar. And that characterizes his entire administration, which embodies a black, lying. Netanyahu, on the other hand, is a man, who is characterized by his manhood. Which individual actually is the chickenshit?

UPDATE:
From Ben Shapiro:

"So, if this administration WERE Jew-hating, what exactly would they be doing differently?"