Saturday, April 4, 2015

Anti-Semitism and Leftist Class Warfare

The western AtheoLeftist Class Warriors are denying that anti-Semitism even exists. This author lists five stages of class war against Jews, and his summary paragraph, below, I have separated into an itemized list:
"When deBoer implies that anti-Semitism is not increasing in Europe and that the real problem is Islamophobia, he ties all of these threads together.
(a)Muslims, people of color, can’t be racist, at least not in any coherent and self-sustaining way;

(b)they are an oppressed people reacting to the depredations of Jews and other whites.

(c)Irrationalist movements that are powered by Jew-hatred don’t exist anymore; that sort of thing was the preserve of white people 70 years ago.

(d)Anti-Semitism today is embraced most frequently and fervently by people of color—but to note that is “the basic logic of bigotry,” blaming the victim while aggrandizing the powerful.

(e)As Chomsky put it himself, “Anti-Semitism is no longer a problem, fortunately. It’s raised, but it’s raised because privileged people want to make sure they have total control, not just 98 percent control.”"
So, any hatred against Jews is because Jews or the West caused the hatred to be deserved. Being a deserved hatred, it is not actually hate, it is justifiable moral indignance at not getting what they want (well documented to be total annihilation of Jews/Israel). This involves the protected Victimhood Class which by definition cannot be racist or hate, the designated Oppressor Class which by definition must be hated, and whatever the Protected Victimhood Class does to the Oppressor Class is deserved by the Oppressor Class, purely because they are designated by definition as the Oppressor Class. In other words, it is an ideology of Classist Hatred which installs hatred and violence as part of its principles.

These class distinctions become rule-bound caricatures which are Leftist-enforced dictation of what (their view of) reality is, viewed strictly and only through the lens of Classist Warfare. There is no other reality for them. Given their dictation of the character of reality, plus their presumption of being messiahs and elites, they are thus morally obliged to force their dictates onto the Oppressor Class, first by condemnations of the simplest self-defense by the Oppressor Class, and progressing from there to excusing bloody assault on the Oppressor Class as justifiable. Further, it is "bigotry" to object to such justifiable bloody assaults because those defined as entitled are also by definition racist and thus deserving of what they get.

1 comment:

Robert Coble said...

Link: Liberals May Regret Their New Rules


Which brings us to America in 2015. It’s becoming a nation where an elite that is certain of its power and its moral rightness is waging a cultural war on a despised minority. Except it’s not actually a minority – it only seems that way because it is marginalized by the coastal elitist liberals who run the mainstream media.

Today in America, we have a liberal president refuses to recognize the majority sent to Congress as a reaction to his progressive failures, and who uses extra-Constitutional means like executive orders to stifle the voice of his opponents. We have a liberal establishment on a secular jihad against people who dare place their conscience ahead of progressive dogma. And we have two different sets of laws, one for the little people and one for liberals like Lois Lerner, Al Sharpton and Hillary Clinton, who can blatantly commit federal crimes and walk away scot free and smirking.

Today in America, a despised minority that is really no minority is the target of an establishment that considers this minority unworthy of respect, unworthy of rights, and unworthy of having a say in the direction of this country. It’s an establishment that has one law for itself, and another for its enemies. It’s an establishment that inflicts an ever-increasing series of petty humiliations on its opponents and considers this all hilarious.

That’s a recipe for disaster. You cannot expect to change the status quo for yourself and then expect those you victimize not to play by the new rules you have created. You cannot expect to be able to discard the rule of law in favor of the rule of force and have those you target not respond in kind.

Vox Day (Theodore Beale) has been banging the drums of 4G war over at his blog:


I think Vox's The Irrational Atheist is a really good LOGICAL read for those interested in the irrationality of atheism and the New Atheists. I bought the book from Amazon, but I just found out there is an online PDF of at least a significant portion of it:

Link: The Irrational Atheist -
Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens

He's not as hard on Daniel Dennett as the other three, merely damning him with faint praise and recommending his book Breaking The Spell.

If you like this blog and the logical way in which arguments are presented, you will also like Vox Day. On the other hand, if you dislike Stan and his precise use of logic, you'll positively HATE Vox Day. He follows a "Take no prisoners" approach to most subjects and he does not mince words.