Perfect Example of Leftist Inversion Lies

The Berkeley Rally Against Hate hosted Antifa with weapons and shields marked "No Hate". These haters attacked the unarmed Patriot Prayer group as well as reporters and camera-holders after bulling their way through police lines/barriers.

So for the Left, "No Hate" means violence against dissenters and reporters, while illegally wearing masks to avoid identification.

Contrarily "Hate" must therefore mean peaceful dissent, reportage, and identification of the perpetrators.

As is now common, violent fascist-esque putsches are now called Anti-Fascist.

Edited Videos

It turns out that the accusations against Milo were constructed from chunks of video taken out of context and edited into a form for the Left to use to rile up and split the conservative base.

The conservatives are known for their circular firing squads, and this one formed up pronto.

Milo is not a pedophile; he investigates and outs pedophiles.

The Left, on the other hand, rewards those who advocate for pedophilia and/or admit to pedophilia - Salon, Meryl Streep, Whoopi Goldberg, Lena Dunham, Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, the entire cast of Comet Ping Pong Pizza and Epstein's Pedophile Island including Clintons and who knows how many other wealthy Leftists. Clinton's (both of them) trips to Pedophile Island didn't make even a blip in her support in the presidential election. Pedophilia is NOT a moral problem for the Left.

But even non-valid charges of pedophilia are punished by the conservatives, especially those who want to split the Right - Remember the Never Trumpers... The Right still needs to purge the Never Trumpers and those determined to dislodge the elected president and violate the constitution (RINOs like McCain). So don't be surprised at other attacks by false videos, false "security" leaks, or whatever they come up with next.

The Leftist outrage is NOT going to stop.

Irony Impaired

"The Country is Lost" and "We are Lost" seem to be among the most popular refrains for the past couple of days.

This is from supporters of open borders allowing in all sorts of minorities to enter with the full intention of eradicating the old western white class, which supports much of the existing minority classes. How that is not losing a country to the globalist-through-chaos attack on country boundaries and existence seems to blow right past these chanter/sign holders.

Doubling debt in just one presidency; weakening the military by reduction, political correctness, and climate priority; racial hostility from the top echelons of government; attacking business constantly via regulation; attacking Christians while ignoring Islamic atrocities at home and abroad; this represents the loss of a country.

Promoting cultural decay by normalizing all perversions; attacking free speech; violating the law by both the president and rebellious city governments; this represents the loss of a country.

What has been lost by the Left is not a country, it is the New World Order; it is a false Right: that of lawlessness whenever it is convenient. The Left has lost control of the national narrative, which they inverted into incivility. The Left has lost the power of Political Correctness to instill fear of censure, and installing voluntary censorship.

The Left HAS lost the country of incivil chaos which they loved. Civility will prevail soon in many quarters, if only for a while. The Left must become civilized, if possible. If not, then marignalized.

Chronicles of Leftist Fake News and Lies

FAKE NEWS: UC Davis Leftists Post Anti-MILO Posters Featuring Fake Rape Quote

"Left-wing students at UC Davis have posted flyers around the campus featuring a fake quote on rape allegedly from Breitbart senior editor MILO, who is scheduled to speak at the college on Friday.

The flyers, which feature the words “SHUT DOWN MILO,” “FIGHT WHITE SUPREMACY,” and “NO PLATFORM FOR HATE SPEECH,” falsely accuse MILO of being many things, including alt-right, a white supremacist, and racist, however it’s the fake alleged quote on rape which aims to rile up protesters in opposition of the dangerous faggot the most.

In a speech bubble titled “On Rape,” the flyer claims that MILO said: “Men are visual animals that quite like to look at sexy women, quite like to rape them sometimes- who cares?”

“This is a flyer that I found in the mens’ bathroom” declared a student, who wanted to remain anonymous, in an email to Breitbart Tech. “So not only will they be trying to block my entrance to your lecture, bought out all your tickets so I cant get a good seat if i even get admitted to the no ticket group, but they are starting their protest a whole hour early.”

The student pointed out the fact that by protesters starting an hour early, one of his lectures would be interrupted.

“Great to know these gender studies majors have nothing better to do than prevent me from getting a real degree” he proclaimed.

Two mainstream media outlets, USA Today and NBC News, were forced to issue corrections on their stories about MILO recently after falsely branding him a “white supremacist” and a member of the alt-right.

Fake News and Lies

If it weren't for lies, Obama couldn't talk at all.

Obama Boasts No Terror Attacks on Our Soil, Then Lists Terror Attacks on Our Soil [VIDEO]

Awww....

Donkey whining:

Schumer: I wish we hadn't triggered 'nuclear option'

The Donks did it because they were certain that they owned the entire future, and therefore half the country and the Constitution didn't matter any more. Now they find that they are actually marginalized and NOT part of the future, at least for four years. Suck it up.

Maybe the nuclear option can move on this:

Congress to Freeze State Department Funds Until U.S. Embassy Moves to Jerusalem

Bill seeks to counter Obama admin refusal to call Jerusalem Israel's capital

And definitely on this:

Senate Republicans just introduced an Obamacare repeal plan Democrats can’t stop

This turnabout with the nuclear option reminds me of the terrorists who blow themselves up with their own bombs: stupid; stupid; stupid. The Left did it to themselves, and deserve to have to choke it down.

Leftist Class War On Truth

Dr Ablow is right. The transgender issue is a legal, moral and intellectual war for the definition of truth.

The real reason why the North Carolina 'bathroom bill' debate is center stage

The use of bathrooms by transgender individuals has come center stage in the U.S. presidential campaign for a reason: The bathroom debate is really a debate about the fundamental way we Americans will define any truth—whether as something deeply felt by an individual, or something scientifically demonstrable and verifiable.

Whether or not one believes gender reassignment therapy or surgery is wise, the cultural acceptance of biological/genetic females as male and vice-versa is tied to whether our species is willing to abandon genetics and biology as fact, in favor of considering a person’s desired self-image to be fact. But, even more, I believe that that fundamental question is tied, in the minds of millions of people, to whether any evidence or data should ever be considered more sacred than closely-held opinion.

If I maintain that my self-concept is that of a black person (and Rachel Donezal does so assert, for herself) and I tattoo myself black, head-to-foot, should our culture accept me as a black man? If I apply to law school as African-American, should I be given any preference that is allowed a minority applicant?

If I maintain that my entire being tells me I am not 54-years-old, but 75-years-old (in my tastes and friendships and energy level), should I be entitled to receive Medicare? Because attorneys I have asked have told me that case law related to transgender issues would make the argument that I ought to be eligible for Medicare carry weight.

If a 25-year-old man maintains that his maturity level and sense of self make him a 13-year-old, should he be allowed to be involved sexually with “other 13-year-olds?”

See, if we believe that transgender individuals must use the restrooms they choose, one could argue that many of our cultural institutions must flex away from fact. And one could argue that cultural chaos will result.

These questions, after all, extend to other realms than race and age. If I were a male member of ISIS, and jailed for terrorist acts, but then insisted while incarcerated that I were a 15-year-old, female American citizen who not only has changed my opinions, but am no longer in any way the person who was convicted of terrorist acts, should I then be released?

If the German people were to vote overwhelmingly, even unanimously, to assert that the Holocaust never happened, and then were to remove any reference to it or evidence of it from their culture, should we be required to not offend them by asserting that the Holocaust did, indeed, happen?

Some readers may think that my questions are preposterous, but they make this point: Many people unconsciously recoil at the potential slippery slope that transgenderism and the bathroom bill represent.

We aren’t simply debating who will use which bathrooms.

Because taken to its extreme, the slippery slope I have described really could have us embracing what is asserted, rather than what is evidenced scientifically, or is historically known to be fact.

Because the Left operates under the Hegelian thesis/antithesis/sythesis strategy as renewed in the Frankfort School and the "march through the institutions", the slippery slope is built into the concept of "Progress"; it is the very definition of Progress. And because the Left operates under the Alinsky tactical methodologies, they will always claim that there is no slippery slope, despite their blatant history of just that.

The Left will always need more and more Victimhood Class members to replace those which have been normalized and put in charge; for example homosexuals now can destroy anyone who looks crossways at them, and they frothingly do so. So the Left's Victimhood Classes will necessarily become ever more aberrant, until either the Left has full and total control, or runs out of aberrants to classify as Victims in need of messiahs to save them.

Truth was long ago jettisoned by the Left, who now create their own truth as the march through the institutions. And their truths frequently conflict with each other, as with feminism vs. transgender women for example. However the idea that truth, when it is true, does not have internal inconsistency is a lost concept, because it is not useful to the Left, and in fact is an encumbrance. Which is why it was jettisoned long ago under postmodernism.

I have noticed that virtually all of the boycotters of North Carolina cheerfully do business with the most abominable and discriminatory regimes in the world, including the Saudis, China, and anyone with money. Their boycott of North Carolina demonstrates the vast hypocrisy which infests the Left. But that is the net result of abandoning truth in favor of phony issues "cloaked in morals", as Alinsky famously directed. The Leftist narrative of "Progress" as they define taking control is more important to them than any truth which they do not define themselves for the world and its concept of reality.

Leftist Brownshirts

Liberals crash ‘Students for Trump’ meeting, threaten violence [VIDEO]

If Anti-capitalism is not fascism, then it is communism. These are proto-violent communists, probably energized by the Bernie movement, and not inhibited by any knowledge of history, economics, or current events in Venezuela, etc., in my estimation.

Professor Bainbridge on Trump, Atheism and the Elites

Donald Trump is the beta test of a cure for The Revolt of the Elites

"Like most of us, I suppose, I've been thinking a lot about Donald Trump's rise to being the front runner for the GOP nomination. Watching the primary season has called to mind one of the best books on American politics and culture I've ever read: The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy. If you want to understand what's going on in our politics and the rise of Trump (and, to some extent, Bernie Sanders), it is a book you need to read.

Lasch powerfully and persuasively contends that that the values and attitudes of professional and managerial elites and those of the working classes have dramatically diverged. Although the claim is controverted, many of us on the right (especially social conservatives) agree with the quasi-populist/communitarian notion that democracy works best when all members of society can participate in a world of upward mobility and of achievable status. In such a world, members of society will perceive themselves as belonging to the same team and care about ensuring that that team succeeds. But how can society achieve this sort of mutual interdependence if its members are not part of a community of shared values?

The core problem is thus the revolt of the elites against the values of the wider community: "[T]he new elites, the professional classes in particular, regard the masses with mingled scorn and apprehension." For too many of these elites, the values of "Middle America" - a/k/a "fly-over country" - are mindless patriotism, religious fundamentalism, racism, homophobia, and retrograde views of women. "Middle Americans, as they appear to the makers of educated opinion, are hopelessly shabby, unfashionable, and provincial, ill informed about changes in taste or intellectual trends, addicted to trashy novels of romance and adventure, and stupefied by prolonged exposure to television. They are at once absurd and vaguely menacing." (28)

The tension between elite and non-elite attitudes is most pronounced with respect to religious belief. While our society admittedly is increasingly pluralistic, "the democratic reality, even, if you will, the raw demographic reality," as Father Neuhaus has observed, "is that most Americans derive their values and visions from the biblical tradition." Yet, Lasch points out, elite attitudes towards religion are increasingly hostile: "A skeptical, iconoclastic state of mind is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the knowledge classes. ... The elites' attitude to religion ranges from indifference to active hostility."

Read it all, THERE.

While it is obvious that it is possible to be an Atheist and NOT be a Leftist-totalitarian, the opposite is much more common. And the inverse - being a Leftist who is NOT an Atheist, regardless of claims to the contrary, is a vanishingly small population. The obvious reason is that of the three Abrahamic religions, only Islam is totalitarian. But Islam hates Atheists, and hence Leftists, with great vigor in the Islamic texts. So, it is not that common for Islamists, Christians and non-secular Jews to be Morally elitist-Leftist-utopian-totalitarian in the same sense that the Atheist Leftists are. It is obvious in the European immigration crisis that the Islamist flood is using the Leftist Islamophile ideologues against themselves.

It's the old snake carrying the mouse across the river story: as the "friendly" snake eats the mouse in the process, the snake says, "You knew I was a snake from the beginning; why are you surprised?"

That Lasch book which the professor mentioned, and another Lasch book, are both in the mail.

Trump-Hater Throws Punch, Gets Pepper Sprayed Immediately

Almost all the violence is from Trump-haters. Here's a response that's deserved:



From Rebel Pundit

Contrast

An internet Atheist, seen at the Illogical Atheist Blog:

And this, the Argument From Reason, as told from the Brooklyn Bridge:







UNFAIR? Well, sure. Engaging internet Atheists is frequently unfair to the Atheist. Ask them to support their worldview of Atheism using their own claim of possession of logic/evidence, and that certainly is unfair to them, because they have none, and will do most anything to avoid admitting it.

Still, here is a chance for the Atheist to hop on board and provide that logic and evidence. Any takers?

The Left Continues In Its Racist Historical Pattern

Meet MoveOn.org: The New KKK

No sheets and a new look for a very old strategy.

Read it all at the source.

Never forget: The Democrat Party was founded on racism: its sole purpose for formation was to perpetuate slavery of blacks. It fomented the Civil War in order to protect slavery. When it lost the war, it formed Jim Crow segregation and the KKK, both of which persisted for roughly a century. Then, in response to the Republican Civil Rights Act of 1964, LBJ created the welfare plan with the Orwellian name, War on Poverty, to perpetuate blacks in poverty and also make them perpetually dependent Democrats... and the blacks fell for it, even making some of their own blacks into their racist Democrat oppressors. The 60's Leftists were first to shriek "white privilege" while calling white babies "pigs" needing termination. Racism, the root of the Democrat Party, became a Leftist tool and it has been wielded with characteristic Leftist violence. Trump will be claimed as inspiration for all sorts of summer-time "racial" protest-violence intended to shut up the opposition by denying them speech venues, as happened in Chicago.



The violence against freedom (speech and assembly) is wholly predictable, because it is in the genetics of the Left, and has always been there historically. It is the party of race tyrants. It will not change now.


ADDENDUM:
Note that the coming race violence is not about race. Islam is not a race; Mexico is not a race. The charge of racism against Trump is McCarthyist hate speech, and is this year's Shut Up.

Black Lives Matter, otoh is purely racist against all whites; the intent is to instill a new cultural standard for black ghettos: drugs, gangs, theft and killing are now black cultural standards which whites may not interfere with or try to control. The new standard is black separatism, i.e., the new segregation into a subnation which is inaccessible to whites (or browns). This already exists in certain blue model cities in the USA, where whites dare not go, and cops dare not arrest.

I disagree...

...with calls to dismiss this person.

Oberlin Leaders Denounce Professor’s Remarks as ‘Anti-Semitic’

Oberlin College’s governing body has denounced as “anti-Semitic and abhorrent” social media posts by a professor that included suggestions Israeli and United States intelligence services were behind terror attacks.

The board of trustees called on the private liberal arts institution in Ohio to conduct a review and report back to it for possible action in the wake of Facebook posts by Joy Karega, a professor in the rhetoric and composition department.

“These grave issues must be considered expeditiously,” Clyde S. McGregor, the board chairman, said in a statement March 5 after a quarterly meeting. “In consultation with President Marvin Krislov, the board has asked the administration and faculty to challenge the assertion that there is any justification for these repugnant postings and to report back to the Board.”

The board’s statement took a stronger stance than the college’s initial reaction to the posts by Dr. Karega, after The Tower, a media organization that reports on Israel and the rest of the Middle East, published on Feb. 25 screenshots of some of her postings from 2015. In them, she referred to the Islamic State group, also known as ISIS, as a “C.I.A. and Mossad organization” — a reference to the Israeli intelligence service — and suggested that Mossad had orchestrated the devastating attacks on Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

A day after the Tower report was published, Oberlin said that it “respects the rights of its faculty, students, staff and alumni to express their personal views,” but that Dr. Karega’s statements did not represent the college’s views.

Then, on March 4, the college published another statement, saying that its president, Mr. Krislov, had met with representatives of Jewish organizations.

“In a welcoming atmosphere, we discussed, openly and candidly, the potential implications of a professor’s personal views on classroom activity and student intimidation,” the statement said. “We also discussed our shared respect for academic freedom.”

Dr. Karega, who is teaching social justice writing courses this semester and does not have tenure, did not immediately reply to messages or return a telephone call seeking comment on Monday.

But on March 5, the same day that the board’s statement was published, she said in a Facebook post that she would no longer speak publicly about her situation at Oberlin.

she should be challenged to show real evidence to support her charges. If she cannot, then she should be revealed as a fraud. She should not be fired, primarily because her defense of Free Speech is perfectly valid. Firing for unwanted speech is the tactic of SJWs. This SJW should merely be shown to be a fraud, and allowed to see her class enrollment shrink to zero, and then re-assigned to grounds maintenance or some-such. The stigma and stench of fraud should stick to her, and her antisemitism forgotten just as is she.

Racist; Bigot; EveryandAnything-o-phobe.

These words are the weapons of the cowardly Left. Unable to speak to any real issues, they instead bleat these pejoratives en masse like a herd of sheep. The real problem,though, is that many people are hurt by the false accusations, and retreat rather than take down the accusers.

Now these Leftist expletives are coming from everywhere, even from the Right. Anyone with skin in the game of politics now is emerging from under their rocks while throwing these false charges at Donald Trump. It's very true that Trump is not a politician, nor a general. It's also true that he is not beholden to the trolls who control the bridge from citizen to president; he doesn't need them and they can't stop him. That has raised some Rightwing fury to raging expletives usually reserved for use by the weak-kneed Leftists.

If not for Trump, the rubber-stamping of Leftist insults on the USA would continue through the campaigns of "Republican" candidates. The standard Republican approach is to take no prisoners by not offending them in any way. Trump emboldened the candidates who want to "have a country", and infuriated the candidates who don't care but want to be president (!Jeb). Without Trump they all would be knelt before the RNC, hoping for sanctification. But not now, and that has terrified the establishment.

For the past decade or longer, the entire western, "civilized" world has been infected with the cultural poison of the hate words of the Left. One cannot avoid being accused with these invectives if one disagrees with the totalitarian procedures which the Left wants in place. (It went national with any objection to Obama's actions being racist with no discussion allowed). And now it is worldwide.

The British health services and police could not protect their girls from rape due to fear of being called "racists" (Rotherham). The Germans and Swedes and Norwegians suppressed news of the molestations and rapes, for fear of being called "racist". In the USA, politicians regularly claim that there is no connection between Islam and our own mass murder by immigrants, because to claim a connection would be called racist, bigot, and Islamophobe.

These are hate-words which are used instead of "shut up, or be denigrated and your reputation destroyed". They are the modern equivalent of branding an "A" on your forehead to illuminate your sinful status, your hostility to, and deviation from, the ranks of the self-righteous priesthood of the All-New-Morality-and-Sinner-Abasement-Cartel.

The use of these Leftist expletives (even now by the Right) demonstrates the urgent need to stop any communication of either dissent, or (especially) to prevent the release any evidence of the obvious consequences of their defective programs, such as multiculturalism, to name one out of many.

What Trump does, and does better than anyone, is to smack down such attacks and the attackers. And that generates copious hatred, to be sure. But for those of us in flyover country it is a relief to see this spark of courage, or what appears to be courage. Because such resilience to attack by Leftist defamation has not been seen in national politics for too long.

From the (not too) Distant Past: It's NOT Islamic Terrorism!

Government renames Islamic terrorism as 'anti-Islamic activity' to woo Muslims


By JAMES SLACK

Last updated at 22:16 17 January 2008

Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.

In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing "anti-Islamic activity".

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam.

Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.

In her first major speech on radicalisation, Miss Smith repeatedly used the phrase "anti-Islamic".

In one passage she said: "As so many Muslims in the UK and across the world have pointed out, there is nothing Islamic about the wish to terrorise, nothing Islamic about plotting murder, pain and grief.

"Indeed, if anything, these actions are anti-Islamic'.

Another section referred to enlisting the Muslim community against "anti-Islamic activity".

Her words were chosen to reflect new Government strategy on labelling the terrorists and their recruiting agents.

The shift follows a decision taken last year to stop using the phrase "war on terror", first adopted by U.S. President Bush.

Officials were concerned it could act as a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda, which is determined to manufacture a battle between the values of Islam and the West.

The strategy emerging across Government is to portray terrorists as nothing more than cold-blooded murderers who are not fighting for any religious cause.

Al Qaeda inspired terrorism is instead being described by key figures as "more like a death cult".

Last night the Home Office stressed that no phrases have been "banned".

But senior Whitehall sources have made it clear that the "war on terror" and "Islamic extremism" will not be used again by people at the top of Government or those involved in counterterrorism strategy.

And Now There's This:

It's NEVER Islam: Shot/Chaser in Philadelphia

So just how delusional is Edward Archer, pictured above (and below), the chap who ran up to Police Officer Jesse Hartnett’s cruiser on the streets of Philadelphia and, brandishing a stolen police revolver, unleashed a hail of bullets, wounding Hartnett? Archer, a recent convert to ISIS, said he did it “in the name of Islam.” That's the shot. And here's the chaser: according to Jim Kenney (D), the mayor of Philadelphia, Archer is so delusional he only thinks he did it in the name of Islam. Clicking on the macro labelled “Islam has nothing to do with it,” Kenney burbled the tired rejoinder:

“In no way shape or form does anyone in this room believe that Islam or the teaching of Islam has anything to do with what you’ve seen on the screen.”

Is that so, Jim?

Reporting on Kenney’s preposterous response, Breitbart made this amusing observation: “Kenney, a Catholic, received his bachelor’s degree from La Salle University, and it remains unclear where his religious expertise concerning Islam derives from.”

Liberals Exploit Children to Attack Trump

NSFW expletive laden child video uses blatant falsehoods to attack the Donald:

Racist By Virtue of Cis-Whiteness

Being white is an unconscious microaggression; So Stop it!

Leave your white skin at the door, or don't come it. Better still, don't come in, just leave and take all white contributions with you. Well, not the building. And not the plumbing. Oh, and not the cell phone and the electrical networks, TV and radio. And automobiles. And gasoline. Leave all that stuff - just all you whites leave.

Countless Crimes of Hillary

Read this at the source: it documents much more than just the server.

The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean

Related:

Does the Media Hold Anyone to a Lower Ethical Standard than the Clintons?

Well, yes; there's still Obama.

Quote of the Day

On Instapundit:

"NONJUDGMENTALISM IN ACTION: “Miley Cyrus Claims She’s ‘Least Judgmental Person Ever,’ Calls Christians ‘Insane Motherf–kers.’”

“Oh, Miley. Thanks for giving us the best example of what ‘tolerance’ looks like in Hollywood: it looks a lot like contempt,” Bristol Palin responds at Patheos.

Ayn Rand was pointing out the hypocrisy of those who profess to be “nonjudgmental” as far back as the chapters written in 1962 for her book The Virtue of Selfishness, and the cult of “nonjudgmentalism” has only been accelerating in the years since. Today, how much do you want to bet that the majority of the “Fire the CEO!”, “Has Justine Landed?” and “Destroy the Pizza Parlor!!!” leftwing crowd will casually claim that nonjudgmentalism is their personal credo, even as they remain increasingly on hair-trigger alert for new ways to be offended, followed by new targets to destroy?"

One should not forget the hysteria surrounding Chik-Fil-A and FRC, which culminated in the attempted mass murder at FRC. It's not so much that they are totally intolerant (of course they are); it's that their intolerance is usually focused on a cartoon of reality, and not on reality itself. And in their wake they leave only destruction, never anything which is beneficial to mankind as a whole, or even specific people. Their intent is exactly intolerance and destruction (of everything western culture has, does, and is), not tolerance. Actual tolerance would destroy them, and render them civilized.

Engineering Mankind With Instillation of Hate

One of the characteristics of the Atheoleftist-dominated self-designated Messiah Class and the Social Justice Warriors in general, is to classify people into convenient classes of Victimhood and Oppressors, and then to accuse by projection of their own hate characteristics onto to those who they hate, those who they designate as Oppressors. This is done for two reasons; first to generate fear in the perpetual Victimhood Class; second, to provide a pseudo-moral basis for the fundamental religious behaviors which are necessary for their tactics.

We can see that in Hillary today, who has just made a hate speech in Texas, and is preparing to ramp up hatred amongst her base, by claiming that Not-Democrats hate blacks. That in turn is expected to increase the hatred which plantation blacks maintain for Not-Democrats, despite the Democrat habit of sucking the life out of the blacks in every city they control.

It could be seen in the perpetuation of the Ferguson concept, "Black Lives Matter", when the fact of Ferguson is that a black attacked a white cop, and the evidence which was overwhelming in favor of the cop is ignored, and "Ferguson" is now a race narrative contained in just that one word.

It can be seen in the sorry affair of Rolling Stone, the University of Virginia, and the liar, "Jackie", where a desired narrative of Oppressors vs. Victims became a national scandal as it was revealed to be false, and yet still was "necessary" to the process of the perpetuation of the concept women's Victimhood, and men as animalistic Oppressors.

It can be seen in both Gamergate, and especially in the SFF hugo awards, which were the exclusive playroom of the "correct thinking" SJWs, until they were challenged by the Other Class. So the Other Class has been lableled with every pejorative that the SJWs can come up with, including NAZI, and that from executives in the publisher, TOR. TOR is experiencing the leading edge of a rebellion of both their readers and their author base, who are incensed at being labeled NAZIs, just because they want fair treatment in both publishing and the award selection process.

The self-righteous arrogance of the SJWs allows them the moral privilege to run the world, and to attempt to destroy, frequently succeeding, the careers and lives of those who have different opinions. Their targets have acceded in the past, and the SJW/Messiah class has succeeded in both their creation of permanent Victimhood classes of the perpetually aggrieved who cannot achieve without the "help" and "protection" of the Democrat SJW/Messiahs. And they cannot understand why it is that their situation always deteriorates, and always needs evermore protection from the white Messiahs.

Modern feminist Victims and plantation black Victims have this in common: they actually are victims. But not of anyone other than their perpetual dominators - the Democrats who have oppressed them ever since the Democrat party came into being nearly 200 years ago. Today the Democrats convince minorities that they are weak, they are ignorant, they cannot stand for themselves, and that they - the party of oppression for nearly 200 years - will serve as their protectors and benefactors. They preserve the master/slave concept by convincing the slaves that having a master is good, in fact it is necessary, because, as slaves, they are too inferior to exist in the real world on their own merits and strengths. And they get away with blaming the slavery on the hated class which is the Not-Democrats.

The modern history of the Democrat party still matches its older history (perhaps why they want to write the history books) in the sense of keeping minorities in subjugation, fearful, and their personal captives; still masters of the slave class. That is the message which is to be taken from Hillary's Hate campaign, as she tries to instill fear of the Other, yet justify opening the doors to more voter fraud, dishonesty at the financial and billionaire level, and borders open to ever-cheaper labor which is supported by government programs of all sorts intended for American citizens, not foreigners here to steal it from actual taxpayers. These are not beneficial to the Victimhood/slave class, but are to the Messiah/Leftist Class. But to say those things becomes "hate", no matter how true they are in actual reality. And so today truth = hate.

We live in times characterized specifically by hate. And that is generated by those advertising their Hatred of Hate, and pumping fear into the unwary. Because that's the path to Utopia; it always is the Path To Utopia, to the New Man, to "egalite'", to "tolerance", and to perfection of humans by the control of the elite engineers of mankind, who must break eggs to make a homogenous omelet out of all humans. And who eats the omelet?

The Victimhood Classes might, possibly, be on the verge of comprehending that when Democrats are in charge things don't get better for the Victims, they get worse. I don't know if it's really the case that the light of realization is turning on. But the real cause for their victimhood needs to be hammered home, because it is true.

UPDATE:
"The age of Obama has passed. Many of the Millennials who enthusiastically supported Obama during his campaigns have grown disillusioned by Washington. A Harvard poll of young voters last year, for instance, found trust in major government institutions dropping dramatically. A large portion are out of work and tired of paying taxes for a ballooning entitlement state — an entitlement state from which they expect no benefits."