Massimo Pigliucci is not just an Atheist, he is also a Leftist so far over that he cannot even see that there is another side to the discussion. He has taken on the “American democracy is rotting” problem from a fairly predictable vantage point – except that this time I actually agree with a couple of things he says. Well, almost on one, anyway.
Massimo lists eight basic issues, their cause and solution. But he numbers just the first 5.
1. Corporations are not individuals and shouldn’t be treated like they are. He is particularly incensed at Republicans in the Supreme Court for this travesty.
Massimo seems to forget that news media are all corporations, and have long been so. He seems to have confused this issue with another one, lobbying. I seriously doubt that he would support not taxing corporations on their incomes just like they are individuals. Denying corporations the right to defend the issues surrounding their existence and their investors sounds like a typical generic Leftist attack on the generic “hated corporations”. Corporations are not lifeless; they are composed of groups of individuals, just as are unions and newspapers and television media – which also benefited from this Supreme Court decision.
2. Lobbying is bribery. All non-individual petitions to the government should be stopped.
Well, that should certainly put the hurt on the environmentalists, unions, rights groups, George Soros and his blizzard of shell groups, etc. Well, of course the rich individuals could spend their lives petitioning. And the lawyers would certainly be glad to sue in their behalf, over and over. And others could chip in for the effort, say corporations, unions, etc.
3. The filibuster is an idiotic and undemocratic tool.
Except a short while ago, when the minority Democrats loved it to death! And vowed their lives and fortunes to protect it. It’s sort of like free speech and dissent; they love it when they're in the minority and hate it when they're the majority. Well, soon enough they will love it again.
4. Two Senators per state is “completely absurd” and an insult to Democracy. Why should Wyoming get the same number of senators as does NY (Massimo’s home state)?
Well, that’s exactly why the House of Representatives exists, Massimo. Maybe we should eliminate the Senate altogether? That would sure help solve problem #2, and #3. (Can House members filibuster? I know they take bribes.) Wait we can solve it completely by eliminating the House of Representatives, too. OK. I'm in. No more laws. Use the ones we've got, or better yet just the Constitution.
5. Two party system: we need more parties.
Parties are created to fill a need, just like any free market. Maybe that’s why Massimo hates it. It’s not the system, it’s the public, which has been de-educated by the social engineers of the Left. The public just won’t vote for libertarians and greenies; if they would, then there would be big parties for those groups. Now if we ban ALL parties, I'm in. Just individuals, standing on their principles and records.
It’s the same market thing as Liberal radio. Liberal radio goes under because no one is listening. Conservative radio does well, so the Left wants to control it. The market should drive such things, not a bunch of Leftist elitists.
6. No personal financing for campaigns: public financing only.
Whoa. The Trial Lawyers, environmentalists, and George Soros won’t like that one – unless they can use the obvious loop hole of campaigning for issues, not for/against candidates like they already do. This one is DOA: it is meaningless in the overall scheme of reality.
7. Automatic and permanent voter registration upon reaching age.
I actually think I might agree with this, providing adequate birth certification is provided. This would help prevent voter fraud, unless the computer records get hacked and / or stuffed with fake people. But it might be just a new target for activist fraud.
Oh yes, and Republicans are “nakedly dishonest when they invoke voter fraud”.
Now that is outrageous and ignorant on its face.
8. Voting should take place over two days.
Why? Um, just …. Why?
Massimo thinks the rot he smells in his new homeland would disappear if folks would just fix numbers 1 through 5.
To me this is so superficial as to be almost laughable, if it did not come from such a person of prominence. He makes no mention of the system of entitlement that is enforced by Leftist policies of victimology, and maleducation directed from the Left, and the wild congressional spending that produces lush retirements for aging politicians as they glean corporate consulting fees as a reward for their largesse. He makes no mention of a media, corrupt and functional purely as trumpets for only the Leftist agenda. He makes no mention of open borders, hordes of illegals, and he actually claims that voter fraud is a Republican fraud.
Sometimes it appears that Massimo merely types a stream-of-consciousness post, and then doesn’t go back and think about it. At least that’s my hypothesis.
4 comments:
Some thoughts--
If the #1 thing that is wrong with American Democracy is a ruling that just occurred and has never affected the outcome of any election, bill, law or any other act of government, then I would say that there must not be much wrong.
There are more than two political parties now.
How would making it easier for the "nearly illiterate (in terms of democratic values) American public" to vote make anything better?
Prof. Pigliucci should recognize that the USA is a republic, not a democracy.
Your "nearly illiterate" comment brings to mind that the original intent of the vote and the representative form was to avoid just that - an ignorant populace voting on things when they know nothing of the consequences which that vote will produce.
That form has been corrupted into encouraging the illiterate/ignorant to vote in their masters just like a dog would vote for the one who feeds him. The Leftists depend on the success of this strategy to maintain their hands in the pockets of the producers, all the while hating the producers... as well as their own constituents.
If they did not hate their own voters they would not subjugate them by suppressing their personal resonsibility and personal accomplishment with largesse stolen from the producers. They even provide guilt-free, responsibility-free sexual promiscuity by promising to kill the foetus on demand.
The Left comes from a base position of hate and irrationality. They engage in hate speech while they vote in hate-thought-crime laws, which apply only to their hated foes.
Stan-
"He who governs least governs best," would be a fairly accurate statement of my political beliefs.
With that in mind-
"the left" is a generality. "comes from a base of hate and irrationality" sounds a bit vitriolic.
I mention this because your writing on all other subjects seems more precise and measured.
Criticism accepted.
Post a Comment