A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Logic and biology are not your strong points, are they Stan? If someone made such a statement about one of your hobby-horses you'd cry "generalization" and dismiss their comment as a fallacy. But then, you really don't practice consistency do you?
Now, let's proceed if your argument was correct and the only possible outcome of every and any "botched" abortion was a live baby. Yes, I know, it's fallacious but it's your argument not mine.
In that case, can you see that you are arguing for better access to abortion clinics and birth control to prevent "botched abortions"?
Yes, I know, you'll throw up some red herring, try to hide behind semantics, use the Gish Gallop, try to poison the well, use guilt by association, or incorrectly claim ad hominem to discredit my points but the fact remains - as usual, you simply don't know what you are talking about.
4 comments:
... or a dead fetus and mother.
Actually a dead fetus and mother would be two abortions for the price of one, a bargain up front, but limiting the return business aspect.
Someone should do a cost analysis on that from the taxpayer's perspective.
-"a botched abortion = a live baby."
-I was a live baby
-therefore I was a botched abortion.
Hey!
Logic and biology are not your strong points, are they Stan? If someone made such a statement about one of your hobby-horses you'd cry "generalization" and dismiss their comment as a fallacy. But then, you really don't practice consistency do you?
Now, let's proceed if your argument was correct and the only possible outcome of every and any "botched" abortion was a live baby. Yes, I know, it's fallacious but it's your argument not mine.
In that case, can you see that you are arguing for better access to abortion clinics and birth control to prevent "botched abortions"?
Yes, I know, you'll throw up some red herring, try to hide behind semantics, use the Gish Gallop, try to poison the well, use guilt by association, or incorrectly claim ad hominem to discredit my points but the fact remains - as usual, you simply don't know what you are talking about.
Post a Comment