Richard Dawkins: "It Is Immoral NOT To Abort A Downs Syndrome Human

The issue, says Dawkins, is not whether it is human; it is whether it can feel pain.

Dawkins no longer thinks through anything that pops into his head. For all I know Dawkins cannot feel pain. And for all he knows, Downs Syndrome fetuses can feel their limbs being ripped off. Muses Michael Brown,

"It is becoming increasingly clear that Dawkins is something of an embarrassment, even to other atheists (although he is still revered by many). The only question that remains is this: Are his irrational and immoral positions unique to him, or are they the logical outcome of his Darwinian evolutionism?"

Irrationality and Atheism go hand in hand, as this site has shown numerous times. The Atheist is free to make up his own morality, and given the reification and deification of Darwinist Evolution as the fundament of Atheism, it is no surprise that eugenics is part of the Atheist worldview.

Richard Dawkins has a vast echo chamber which affirms anything he says. Many Atheists credit Dawkins with saving their lives (from moral principles which they don't care for) and for making it clear that humans may be culled the same as any husbanded animal species, because human animals are accidents of evolution and no more than that.

Well, except for Atheist evolution story tellers who presume to have the moral authority to determine that it is immoral NOT to kill certain categories of humans. That person is venerated. The killing of the story teller would be an international tragedy with commensurate worldwide outrage. Even his eventual death due to Alzheimer's will likely bring about an international Dawkins Day, maybe just adjacent to Darwin Day.