(7) This in turn brings us to immigration, which amounts to the importation of people so they can hate each other.So. Moral posing vs. not inclusive. The SJW must choose correctly according to SJW narrative, or be subjected to mass revulsion and expulsion. Moral posing is so much easier to pull off. And easier on the glands, too.
Open borders are supported by vaguely warm-hearted appeals to those who think with their glands. There are probably 500 million Indians, as many Chinese, hundreds of millions of Africans, more Muslims, and several hundred million Latin Americans who would like to emigrate to the United States. The question for Social Justice Warriors is how many of these should be admitted–none, all, or a specific figure between?
Anyone who makes noises in favor of immigration should answer this question as otherwise he will be engaging in mere moral posing. But to choose one number is to exclude another number. Not inclusive, that.
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Thinking With Their Glands
Fred Reed, anthropologist of the week:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment