...which I will paraphrase considerably and add to as well:
Atheists want to have it both ways. In terms of existence they assert absolutely that there can be no exceptions to natural law; i.e. there can be no singularities which are "miracles". This is asserted to be absolutely the case, of course, despite the demurral of Hume and philosophers of science, including Quantum Mechanics physicists. Natural law is deterministic, and thus, so are we.
But in terms of ethics and morality, there are no longer any absolutes, no rules, no Atheist Moral Principles. And this is asserted to be absolutely true in the Atheist universe, despite the contrary assertion of natural absolutes which define the universe totally.
The purpose of both contradictory denials is specifically to enable the progression (by "progressives" of course) into contradictory and non-coherent paths by eliminating any deity or principles from the social and moral landscape. If there are no absolutes then there is no coherence issue; if there are absolutes, then they cohere. So coherence is not a consideration any more.
The consequence of this goes directly to releasing mankind, at least the elites, from personal responsibility as well as any overarching meaning. Aside from the obvious nihilist turn, this ultimately results in moral chaos and intellectual turpitude.
This chaos is no longer hypothetical nor is it based on observations of the Atheist calamities of the 20th century Europe, Russia, China, and Asia tyrannies. it is quite observable in the USA today (especially in government, education and mass media) and is known empirically in our own society which has experimented for 40 years with AtheoLeftist control of the minds of children who became maleducated; control of federal and some state governments (California's moral and governmental collapse is a poster-child); control of psychology and most of university professoriates; control of the national media and Hollywood.
The intellectually chaotic Atheist mind seeks only that which supports the fawning elitism which Atheists bestow upon themselves. This goes back at least to Comte who attempted to create a New Man society which was to be dominated by brilliant elites, intellectual engineers who would design society to fit their uber-rational divinations. The Other would be subject to the intellectualisms which floated down from the elitist overlords. This occurred in the 19th century, and Comte was influenced by Darwinian selection.
Darwinian selection is no longer the mantra of evolutionists, but it still is on the minds of those who think themselves to be evolved beyond the state of the Other, who they despise. Elitism, with all its perceived perquisites is the goal, and it is an emergence of the Nietzschean Will To Power. Elites, by their very nature, deserve power.
I'm ashamed that this happened on my watch, while I was minding my own business. We must take back what has been lost to the western moral null and the false Scientism; the task seems impossible at this point, and certainly it's impossible without considerable disruption to an ignorant, and self-involved populace. It is the nature of the disruption which remains to be... designed and implemented.
3 comments:
This is asserted to be absolutely the case, of course, despite the demurral of Hume and philosophers of science, including Quantum Mechanics physicists.
One of the most recent books I've read on physics stated that photons for example is not actually matter BUT it can exhibit the behavior of waves or particles,though it is neither.This is enough to destroy the atheist's ideology that matter is the building blocks of reality.
What the atheist means to say is that matter is the sole building block of HIS reality. Never mind that, if what he says is true, there is no reason whatsoever to pay any further attention to him, as he is merely behaving in a way peculiar to the aggregation of matter that makes up his body and brain. He cannot choose anything else, because there is no 'him' seperate from the long chain of physical causes to do the choosing.
It's not that materialists don't understand - they WON'T understand. It's a choice, to embrace the Nothing and the absolute nonsense that goes with it in order to do whatever you like until someone catches you.
What the atheist means to say is that matter is the sole building block of HIS reality.
Another common argument atheists use is that.although quantum objects are not defined as matter in the classical newtonian sense; it only applies to the microscopic world while the macrospcopic world which we observe is still stubbornly classic.But then we are all still made up of quantum objects even though it's unobservable.
Post a Comment