A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I have read only about a handful of logic books/textbooks but I have yet to come across a chapter that prescribes mockery as a logical method for refuting arguments.
It seems Dawkins and company subscribe to a completely different set of logical rules.
Post a Comment