A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Ravi On Dawkins
Dawkins' hate has long clouded his judgment and has negated his logic. What is significant is not Dawkins himself, it is the number of his followers, his army of haters.
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
I have read only about a handful of logic books/textbooks but I have yet to come across a chapter that prescribes mockery as a logical method for refuting arguments. It seems Dawkins and company subscribe to a completely different set of logical rules.
1 comment:
I have read only about a handful of logic books/textbooks but I have yet to come across a chapter that prescribes mockery as a logical method for refuting arguments.
It seems Dawkins and company subscribe to a completely different set of logical rules.
Post a Comment