Wednesday, August 5, 2009

500th Post

This is the 500th post to this blog, which has been active for 21 months. The focus of the blog has varied some from its original intent, with the national advent of the domination of political power by the (now unabashedly socialist) Democrats. In terms of Atheism, the socialistas now in power are not, generally speaking, willing to admit their lack of religious guidance or morals in general, and are in fact faux Christians and heretical Catholics. But their objectives and tactics betray their allegiance to the likes of Saul Alinsky, Atheist provocateur and ethical reductionist. Obama, of course, taught Alinsky tactics right out of the book during his Chicago days as an organizer/agitator.

The month of August will be devoted to the Alinsky tactics of demonizing the enemy in public forums. This time the enemy is the insurance industry, which the Obamacrats are intent on destroying in the public mind, in their march toward government health and death control.

"The organizer... must first rub raw the resentments of the people in the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression." Alinsky, Rules For Radicals (RFR), pg 116.

Alinsky's thirteenth rule of tactics:
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." RFR pg 130.

Alinsky's eighth rule of tactics:
"Keep the pressure on", RFR pg 128.

Alinsky's seventh rule of tactics:
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag", RFR pg 128.
There is little doubt about it. Pelosi has already started the name calling. The White House is demonizing Drudge for the release of video with Obama calling for single payer insurance. Television commercials have already begun. The fear mongering is based on lies, of course, but as Alinsky said, any tactic is justified if the end goal is worth it.

Alinsky's third rule of ethics:
"...in war the end justifies almost any means" RFR, pg 29
.

"The opposition's means, used against us, are always immoral and our means are always ethical and rooted in the highest of human values", Alinsky, RFR pg 29.

And the mindless Leftist satirists are hard at their ad Hominem work trying to find new synonyms for "stupid" when referring to the opposition:

Alinsky's "humor" tenet:
"...the most potent weapons known to mankind are satire and ridicule", RFR pg 75;

Alinsky's fifth rule of tactics:
"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon", RFR pg 128.

The Alinsky ethic, the ethic of the Left which is now in control, is to win by using any method whatsoever. In other words, an Atheist ethic; totally relevant to no morality at all, except those issues chosen by the Left to be denoted as “fierce moral imperatives” And those "fierce moral imperatives" are abandoned at a moments notice, as need be.

Alinsky's tenth rule of ethics:
"...you do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments" RFR pg 36
.
The Obama administration is seriously jam-packed with Alinsky-Atheists, with eugenicist-socialists in almost every seat of government czardom. And the administration is awash with obsequious slavering “journalists” whose Leftness is far more important to them than any quaint notions of objectivity.

If you still haven’t read “Rules For Radicals” by Saul Alinsky, I encourage you to do so, and quickly. Once you have become familiar with the ethics and tactics outlined there it will be easy to see them in play in the administration and Congress and the MSM, virtually every day. It's an all-new Alinsky America.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I have not read "Rules for Radicals", nor have I read "The Road to Surftom", and I don't think I will need to either. It seems we are getting the 'live' version of both books from what I see. I also don't think that most Americans realize that Adolf Hitler achieved something like 95% of his power legally through the German government. Although I'm not sure that all that's being done here is contitutional.

"Heil"

Stan said...

Hitler had to engage his brownshirts in order to run off some of his political opponents. They engaged in bullying tactics and fear mongering. Hmmm sound familiar? Well it's not quite the same, yet. But with the administration asking for citizens to turn in bloggers who are dissidents with respect to the health/death care initiative, it's getting closer all the time. As a dissident blogger, can I expect a visit from a government agent who will "re-educate" me with a little waterboarding? Well, not yet, not yet... nok nok nok