A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
"Young people grew up in a post-Soviet world. When they hear 'socialism,' they think Scandinavia, not Russia...if conservatives can’t wean themselves off of Cold-War-era rhetoric, they risk alienating an entire generation of young people."
Which merely means that education truly has been corrupted. Not to know what happened in the last 100 years is inexcusable. Not to teach it is corruption.
You know what really disgusts me? It's not even that they advocate socialism or Marxism. If that was all, I'd just say they were wrong or mistaken. It's the fact that they deliberately try to subvert our government and make people comply to their point of view through false pretenses. I could at least respect her if she openly advocated socialism and tried to convince people through rational debate that it is good. We have a Socialist party that does that, but they want to do it secretly under the overweening assumption that they know better than we do and we're too stupid to figure it out in time to save ourselves.
5 comments:
"Young people grew up in a post-Soviet world. When they hear 'socialism,' they think Scandinavia, not Russia...if conservatives can’t wean themselves off of Cold-War-era rhetoric, they risk alienating an entire generation of young people."
To young voters, socialism isn’t a bad word
Which merely means that education truly has been corrupted. Not to know what happened in the last 100 years is inexcusable. Not to teach it is corruption.
Keep up the good work and the God work!
You know what really disgusts me? It's not even that they advocate socialism or Marxism. If that was all, I'd just say they were wrong or mistaken. It's the fact that they deliberately try to subvert our government and make people comply to their point of view through false pretenses. I could at least respect her if she openly advocated socialism and tried to convince people through rational debate that it is good. We have a Socialist party that does that, but they want to do it secretly under the overweening assumption that they know better than we do and we're too stupid to figure it out in time to save ourselves.
Huggums: Agreed!
Post a Comment