Wednesday, April 27, 2011

The US Human Rights Report Drops Religious Freedom

The mandated Religious Feedom Report disappears from the US Human Rights Report:
”As the issue of religious liberty appears to become more and more of a lost cause to the Obama Administration, the issue takes on a critically important role in the world. From the regime changes underway in Egypt and Tunisia, to the ongoing crackdown of religious believers in China, to the horrid depravity committed against religious believers in Eritrea, to the devolving rights of religious believers in Russia and Venezuela, the impact of religious discrimination and persecution has a direct impact on so many other interrelated issues, not the least of which is counter-terrorism and national security.

“By not updating the annual human rights report with new information and trends of interest, the State Department clearly demonstrates that the issue is of no concern or interest to them. This is an enormously dangerous signal to be sending, especially at a time when the world is in such transition and abuses can easily occur and systems changes can harm fundamental rights of individuals if the Department does not stay active and engaged on the issue.

“Unfortunately, by not updating and incorporating religious freedom in the Annual Human Rights report, the State Department failed at what Secretary Clinton said was its very purpose: "And we hope that this report will give comfort to the activists, will shine a spotlight on the abuses, and convince those in government that there are other and better ways."

Joseph K Grieboski; The Case of the Disappearing Religious Freedom Report.

Obama spent nearly 20 years listening to the religion of Social Justice being shrieked at the church of Black Liberation Christianity, an inverse of Biblical Christianity. Religion of the form: Biblical Christianity, is a problem, a social issue, for Black Liberation Christianity and presumably for acolyte Obama; Biblical Christianity certainly doesn't warrant defending. But Biblical Christianity is not aggressive in a form that can be litigated against; it is best just ignored and its punishment left to others. And Islam, in which Obama was raised, is his target of deference, along with his agenda of Social Justice.

So there are few major forms of religion that are of actual concern to the administration, certainly not the Christianity which is receiving the brunt of punishment from Atheist China, Russia, and Muslims worldwide. And Islam is still seen as the religion of peace and is not to be blamed for the actions of Islamists worldwide according to current policy.

Perhaps if Christians were dealing out the misery rather than receiving it, there might be an outcry. Otherwise, what is there to worry about?

But there is also a legitimate possibility for dropping religious persecution from Human Rights considerations. If religious freedom can be inferred to support the Islamic vision of a worldwide caliphate under Sharia, and to interfere with that Islamic vision can be inferred as a violation of religious freedom, what then? The concept of religious freedom can be easily corrupted into religious totalitarianism, and the freedom to assert that total control over all people. In this sense, religious freedom is a hazard.

Traditionally religious freedom meant the freedom to worship – or not – as one chooses. Implicit is the constraint against forcing religion on others. But for Islam, the religion is force and the practices of the Qur’an advocate and even demand force. Islam is incompatible with Western freedoms and the clash between imposing it and resisting it is inevitable.

This Islamic religious paradox which produces a violent certainty might be a valid reason to avoid the pursuit of religious freedom by the US Government.

Even further, would the USA choose Shia or Sunni? If the USA becomes Shiite, then we must battle the Sunnis who have nukes and control a whole bunch of oil. If the USA becomes Sunni, then we must battle Shiites who foster a whole lot of terrorism and will have some nukes. Well, that’s just a mess, so the USA had better not think about it.

Much less write reports about it.

2 comments:

Yasmine said...

I was interested in your writings because you base alot of them on logic, but I'm sorry to tell you knowledge is an important asset to sound logic.You know very little about Islam (Obama or not!-being prejudice is a problem-). If you would like to know abit about Islam,and the different sects (like Catholic, Protestant,Angilcan...etc) please contact me: https://www.facebook.com/Yaz.H.M.Elkhodary....Goodluck!

Stan said...

Yasmine,
I have read the Qur'an, and I have read several histories of Muhammed, the co-option of Islam by Gutman after Muhammed's death, by burning all the other's notes and re-writing the Qur'an himself; and I know why there is hatred between the Sunnis and the Shiites, because Gutman (Sunni) stole the religion from Muhammed's own son (Shia).

I know approximately how many Jews Muhammed killed in his eugenic, genocidal wars, and I know roughly how many he behaded himself after their capture; and I know how his Surahs contradict each other on what to do with "people of the book". I know how everytime he lusted after young girls, married or not, somehow Allah said OK, one more for you is OK, kill the husband if you wish, take the 9 year old if you wish.

I am aware that a victimized woman who is raped will be victimized again by her own family. I am aware that pornography and philandering is rampant amongst Muslim men, and that they have been promised virgins in heaven if they are martyred (originally 72 virgins, recently increased to several million). Women are treated like cattle, and men are allowed to rut like hogs.

I know that the Palestinian constitution of Gaza calls for the annihilation of all Jews. I know that the Sunnis who are close to Iran fear the Shia's upcoming nukes, because the hatred and warring is irrational and totalitarian.

I am aware that the Muslim Brotherhood is more like the mafia than like a religion of peace. I know that Egypt is lost to civilization if the Muslim Brotherhood is allowed to maintain control (the persuecution of non-Muslims has already begun). I am aware that the Islamists are raping, killing, starving, and enslaving their way across northeast Africa. I am aware that most of the aggression in the world is Islamist attacks on local peoples.

I am aware that Islam is interpreted to its adherents by local imams, if that is what you mean by sects, although you might mean warring sects.

What else do I need to know? The five Pillars? How the religion of peace is so tolerant? How they will treat me when they show up at my door with their AK47's on their path to the global caliphate?

Give me some examples please.