The AtheoLeft Defense of Their Right To Kill

As far as I am concerned, the moral issue of abortion is settled. The supporters of abortion have only one argument: they have the right to devalue human life at whatever stage they choose, and the Right To Kill humans in that devalued category.

Their arguments of “woman’s right to choose” and “privacy” are logically ridiculous, since no person can claim a right to choose to kill his offspring except under the elitist’s human devaluation criteria – so the question devolves to the original argument.

And “privacy” as an argument is also ridiculous since no one can kill anyone just because it is a private matter, except under the elitist human devaluation criteria, so again the question devolves to the original argument.

The remotely related argument of a woman’s right to control her own body and her pursuit of happiness, also doesn’t apply to using her body to kill or to pursue her happiness at the death of another, except under the elitist human devaluation criteria.

The counter-arguments are relatively second-hand: “this blob can’t be the same value as its mother”. Embedded at the very surface of such arguments is the presumption of the Right To Devalue human life, followed by the Right To Kill devalued human life.

There is only one actual argument, and that is the elitist Leftist presumed, self-authorized, Right To Kill humans which they have devalued.

Their failure to address the moral relativity which was presented in the prior post demonstrates the ideological lock down which infests the worldviews of the AtheoLeft. They cannot defend the moral relativity which they assert for themselves. So they either disappear, shrinking from their intellectual and moral responsibility, or they ridicule the questions presented to them which demonstrate the moral relativity specifically for them. (Or they ignore all that and reassert the failed positions, above).

The overall demonstration of the false moral principles which inhabit the AtheoLeft when they leave the ecstasy of the VOID shows up clearly when abortion is the subject.

Addendum:
The Left's Right To Kill seems also to be supported by their lack of empathy for the victims of Benghazi, and the victims of the Justice Department's gun walker schemes. This indicates that killing, when done by members of the Leftist idelogy, is of no concern. And guns are of no concern either... unless there is an ideological advantage to cursing them, as was provided by the Newtown massacre; then the Left goes into a lathered frenzy in their attempts to remove arms from good citizens as opposed to the Justice Department.

Not to mention, of course, Eric Holder's initial refusal to define the limits of presidential power to drone-kill Americans on American soil... until humiliated by Rand Paul's highly visible filibuster which pried out a more legitimate opinion. The Left not only did not support Rand, they ridiculed him, indicating a complete lack of interest in who gets killed by whom so long as it is on the Left.