Thursday, July 4, 2013

The Declaration of Independence and the Responsibility to Free the People From Government Usurpation of Rights.

There is no remaining respect on the Left for "ancient documents", which they consider to be moldy, unimportant, and without meaning in the modern world, where they, the Left, have redefined Rights, morals, and principles of truth as being either malleable, or discardable altogether. The electorate is meaningless to the unelected judges who are the Supremes of the Left, and are the new untouchable, oligarchic arbiters of law and morality in the Land of the Free.

This type of government, government by the fiat of the unelected Supremecists, is coming close to that of King George, the subject of the moldy, ancient document - Declaration of Independence:

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.


That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.


This is only part of the document, the metanarrative describing the principles upon which the new nation will be formed.

One of my favorite lines in this moldy document is this:

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.


Today these are called "czars", which are offices created to circumvent the approval of Congress, and also include the DOJ/IRS/BATF/HHS/EPA etc., staffed now by millions of mostly Leftists, with power no longer controllable by the representatives of the people. Many of these feds are armed.

Repeating part of the above:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.


That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.


If there is no creator, then there are no unalienable rights with which to be endowed; under Atheist Leftism, human rights become those which they, the Atheist Leftist elites, declare to be allowable. Thus it is that Barack Hussein Obama declared his preference for "positive rights", which are those human rights which are limited to only those which are positively designated as "Rights" by the state, with all other behaviors not designated specifically banned; the state has the total power and right to bestow - or remove - any rights as it wills it.

The idea that the state can declare the "Right" to kill one's progeny (within state-designated boundaries) is now an established nullification of the ancient, moldy notion that there is an unalienable Right to life, as is declared in the Declaration of Independence, and which is declared to be a necessary, deity-given right. Now, some living American humans no longer have that right to live, and may be killed summarily on demand and without due process or oversight of any kind. Opposition to this killing is declared to be bigotry against the right to kill as a facet of other, imagined "new rights", such as women's healthcare, or Right To Choose to kill one's progeny (except for men), or reproductive rights, with no mention or concept of responsibility for reproductive consequences. Regardless of the rationalization of "new moral principles" to support this killing, it is obvious that the "new morals" being espoused are nothing more than the overheated pontifications of the AtheoLeft, not a reference to any objective, overarching moral structure outside of their fevered minds and egos. Confusing the concept of Liberty (especially when taken in conjunction with the Right to Life) with a presumed Liberty To Kill One's Progeny, For Women Only, On Demand, Without Oversight, is absurd.

And as far as the Right to Liberty goes, the Leftist Federal Government has attacked and abused its opponents using the power of the government as its weaponry attempting to deny the Free Speech. Further it has refused to acknowledge the will of the people regarding Congressional votes and state initiative driven constitutional amendments, even while cynically referring to the sovereignty of the individual states. It has destroyed the US educational system and spread illiteracy to heights that wouldn't have been believed by anyone just a few decades ago, even while siphoning billions to unionized teachers which oppose merit overview. It has turned over the US currency to fiat money which is manipulated by a voracious connection of banks via the FED, where banks have their fiscal transgressions covered by printing more money for direct distribution to them (never to the people), where the bankers never experience consequences for their transgressions, where the bankers support their congressmen with lavish donations.

The pursuit of happiness is marred by chronic, under-reported unemployment, job loss, and illegal labor.

The safety of the nation is ignored by the lack of interest in securing the borders, even while granting permanent amnesty programs for those who march right into the US, illegally.

If there were not a playbook on how to destroy a nation, the Atheoleft in control of the US could certainly be the focus of a new book on the subject. I think maybe Cloward-Piven together with Alinsky actually do provide such a collection of destructive instruction, all cloaked in morality, as Alinsky instructed.

The original founders suffered more severe persecution than we have - so far. But when they arose against it, they did so with resolve and fervor, albeit with squirrel guns and loose militias. Today it is said that in an invasion of the US, the invaders would encounter a gun behind every blade of grass. When the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it [oppressive government], and to institute new Government is finally exercised once again, every blade of grass will become lethal, to both sides. However, the AtheoLeft is unyielding, unbending, and importantly, either amoral or immoral or automoral/tautologically self-declared moral. If its opposition is to survive, it will have to mount a similarly rigid counter attack for its continuance.

The Left in action: Abortionistas shout "Hail Satan", as Pro-Lifers sing Amazing Grace in Texas:



Abortionistas stalked legislator as terrorist tactic, and hope for rape of opponents.

Abortionistas blocked a vote on abortion in the Texas legislature by swarming in and causing chaos to prevent the vote from happening before the midnight deadline. The vote passed, but two minutes beyond the deadline. But Governor Rick Perry called another legislative session to allow consideration of the bill, which only prevented Goslin-like abortion abbatoir conditions from occurring, and non-threatening killing after 20 weeks. Abortionistas want no health oversight of their killing fields.


Note the socialist website reference on the left sign.

The world would be less interesting without the AtheoLeft, for certain. Also, less dangerous.

6 comments:

Stunned. said...

"If there is no creator, then there are no unalienable rights with which to be endowed"

It was written by deists. In the sentence before that you can see what they thought the creator was. "...the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them...". That's Nature with a capital N.

As for the anti-abortion, some one once said "You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

Stan said...

Stunned,
You surely can see the words you typed include the term Nature's God.

So your attempt to use your verbal prestidigitation to make the term "God" disappear fails.

Further, an Atheist promoter of killing unborns on demand who cynically quotes Jesus has no merit for doing so. Especially when it is designed to deflect guilt, when guilt is properly attributed. It is now obvious that even actual Satanists reject abortionistas.

yonose said...

Stan,

That's the real problem with the constant mismatch between postpodernist Feminism, empirical Feminism and such similar political movements.

The actual problem is not that they lean extremely to the left (being myself a "centrist") only.

The normative problem of Feminism sounds a good ideal, until there's the need of reviewing the implications of, how Feminism is being practiced like it is right now. Their focus is now nailing very specific issues, but in a very sparse distribution.

The main problem with feminism as it is posited, is precisely their lack of essentialism: this means that we humans are utterly reduced to our economical and political views, discarding the very complex physical and spiritual nature of ourselves. Which ideally, would ultimately solve differences amoung us, highlighting something all human beings have in common.

This also means that Feminism, as periodically acting in "waves", has its own reactionary tendencies, is because it will always act as a "counter-balance" for any political issue they believe is their "enemy", and then, as has always happened, the acting principles of Feminism finally become so narrowly contextualized, that is supporting my presupposition: is the anti-essensialist nature that such political movements have. It would not matter if those were leaning to economical left or economical right, it will always be an extreme.

Kind Regards.

Steven Satak said...

@yonose: I consider myself somewhat well-read and I have a very hard time extracting any actual information out of that statement you just made.

I subtracted all the poli-speak, boiled down the twenty dollar words and let the multiple negatives cancel each other out.

What was left was still so vague that I don't really know what it was you were trying to say.

Could you publish a summary in one sentence that does not include 'isms' and 'ized' words?

Thank you in advance.

yonose said...

@Steven Satak,

I sincerely apologize for leaving this in the air. I did not have just enough time and energy to respond to you for those days. I think, and hope to be proved wrong also, that your response to my comment is due to the very nature, of radicalism and philosophy of the Feminist Movement, specially, nowadays. It is difficult to resume the feminist movement in a few sentences and not recurring to such an abstract wording.

I'll elaborate the reasons later.

Kind Regards.

yonose said...

@Steven Satak

Also, my spanglish sucks.

by "resume" I meant "summarize"

by "recurring" I meant "resorting"

Kind Regards.