Slippery Slope vs. Kinseyan Spectrum vs. Total Libertinism, Sexual, Moral, Intellectual, Political.

Headline:

Australian judge says incest may no longer be a taboo
"Judge in Australia says incest may no longer be a taboo and the only reason it is criminal is potential birth abnormalities, which can be solved by abortion "

Unsurprisingly, he compares incest to homosexuality which was once a forbidden sexual behavior. So the slippery slope, aka the Kinsey Spectrum of Sexual Behaviors (all legitimate, of course), will ultimately result in total sexual libertinism. And that is just a symptom of the underlying intellectual libertinism for which "no truth" spells out no morality at all, and "tolerance" spells out no challenging our libertinism".

Vox Day comments:

There is no middle ground. What devotees of one particular immorality or another believe is a reasonable stopping point - here, and no further - is nothing more than a waystation on the road to total depravity of the worst imaginable sort.

We libertarians were wrong. Societal liberty simply cannot be maximized through sexual anarchy any more than it can be maximized though unrestricted immigration, unrestricted government, or unrestricted voting. In retrospect, this should always have been obvious: if everything goes, then literally everything will go. This is no longer a hypothetical objection on the part of traditional conservatives, it is an undeniable reality. It is human nature to push at the boundaries; there will always be those who cross the line. Therefore, the line needs to be set firmly along boundaries that are undeniably eucivic and proven by centuries of tradition to be sustainable in the long term.

There will be those who disingenuously insist that the clock cannot be turned back, that humanity is doomed to an endless future of sodomy, incest, rape, necrophilia, and bestiality. This is provably false; the current period of sexual anarchy in the West is hardly the first in human history and it is very short by historical standards. And this particular clock most certainly will be turned back, one way or another, because everything from birth rates to the transmission rates of sexually transmitted diseases indicate that the current state of near-sexual anarchy has already reached the point of unsustainability.

With the death of meaning for the term, marriage , the advent of Homosexuals as victims, and abortion as "women's health", there no longer is any realistic barrier sexual activity along Kisey's spectrum such as pedophilia or incest (or necrophilia or any other sexual behavior). The objections of some Leftists that Homosexuality was the last stop for "reform" is just bleating into the wind. Once morality is abridged, there is no stopping it until all immorality is gathered into the fold of "victimhood" and normalization. The fact that some homosexuals oppose pedophilia is nullified by the same charge used against opponents of homsexuality normalization: hypocrisy; irrational pedophobia; discrimination against a victim category; demonization of detractors of "normal sexual behavior" a la Kinsey; sexual bigotry not worthy of modern social needs. What worked for one deviation category will certainly work for the others.

But Vox is right; it will not be sustained long term because deviant behavior always becomes too radicalized and too destructive for the host society to continue to allow it. The problem becomes how to put the demons back in the box. They won't take it well. And violence is predictable, since violence was part and parcel of the homosexual liberation movement.