THE CELEBRATED ‘ROOTS’ OF A LIEBut there is more:
"ON Friday, NBC will air a special commemorating the 25th anniversary of the landmark miniseries based on Alex Haley’s book “Roots.” Ironically, the original series aired on ABC – but officials at that network took a pass on broadcasting the tribute.
What’s truly amazing, however, is that “Roots” is receiving a reverential tribute at all. For while the miniseries was a remarkable – and important – piece of television, the book on which it was based has now been widely exposed as a historical hoax.
Unfortunately, the general public is largely unaware of how Haley’s monumental family autobiography, stretching back to 18th-century Africa, has been discredited.
Indeed, a 1997 BBC documentary expose of Haley’s work has been banned by U.S. television networks – especially PBS, which would normally welcome such a program.
Coincidentally, the “Roots” anniversary comes amid the growing scandal over disclosures of historian Stephen Ambrose’s multiple incidents of plagiarism. Because as Haley himself was forced to acknowledge, a large section of his book – including the plot, main character and scores of whole passages – was lifted from “The African,” a 1967 novel by white author Hal Courlander.
But plagiarism is the least of the problems in “Roots.” And they would likely have remained largely unknown, had journalist Philip Nobile not undertaken a remarkable study of Haley’s private papers shortly before they were auctioned off.
The result was featured in a devastating 1993 cover piece in the Village Voice. It confirmed – from Haley’s own notes – earlier claims that the alleged history of the book was a near-total invention.
“Virtually every genealogical claim in Haley’s story was false,” Nobile has written. None of Haley’s early writing contains any reference to his mythic ancestor, “the African” named Kunta Kinte. Indeed, Haley’s later notes give his family name as “Kante,” not “Kinte.”"
"The Pulitzer Prize board has refused to reconsider Haley’s prize, awarded in 1977 – in what former Columbia President William McGill, then a board member, has acknowledged was an example of “inverse racism” by a bunch of white liberals “embarrassed by our makeup.”"The Left will protect its designated Victim Class using whatever means is necessary to justify their ends. There is no ethical principle which applies to the Left other than "do what is necessary to further the Left". That leaves all paths open for their use.
One might imagine the uproar if the offender were either white or a conservative, or quelle horreurs, both.
1 comment:
Even more:
Yet even today, much of America – both black and white – continues to perpetuate the “Roots” myth.
In 1997, Haley’s older brother George was named U.S. ambassador to the Gambia – his family’s supposed homeland. Then-Vice President Al Gore said at the time, “George Haley is the direct descendant of Kunta Kinte.” Added Gore: Haley’s appointment would “complete a cycle of history.”
Haley’s defenders insist that the literal truth of “Roots” is less important than its larger truth; that, as Gates has put it, ” ‘Roots’ is a work of the imagination” that was “an important event because it captured everyone’s imagination.”
The Prophet Gore hath spoken; so let it be written, so let it be done.
Could there be another "cycle" (maybe, Global Climate Change) that the former Veep is pedaling as hard as he can?
As for the "larger truth" defended at the "Roots", why don't we embrace the "larger truth" of The Da Vinci Code, by author Dan Brown? After all, it fits the "larger truth" goal, even though it is fiction. Isn't it also "a work of the imagination” that was “an important event because it captured everyone’s imagination?”
Oh, forgetful me: it WAS (and still is) considered to be a work of non-fiction by those who wish for it to serve a "larger truth" than literal truth or TRUTH as is traditionally known.
BARF!
Post a Comment