New 'feminist' government with a Green tinge in SwedenIt turns out that paradise has crumbled, so they voted in some more socialism:
Stockholm (AFP) - Sweden's new Social Democrat prime minister Stefan Loefven unveiled what he called a "feminist" government including Green Party ministers for the first time in the Nordic country.
""Sweden is in a serious situation -- unemployment has become entrenched at high levels, school results have collapsed and the welfare system has major shortcomings," he said."Unemployment high in utopia? What about all those equal outcomes? If the unemployed make just what the employed make, then why would anyone want to be employed? And feel-good socialist education is not working? And the welfare system needs more...
It turns out that the socialists were "profit hunting" using government programs. Who would guess that government officials would be corrupt? Could that happen in utopia?
And of course there's always the "rape" panic. Will all PIV sex be banned in Utopia? How feminist will they be? Just a little? Or the whole lesbian agenda?
"He also vowed to criminalise Swedes that travel abroad for sex tourism, and to toughen the country's rape laws. "
Dawkins should be proud. Well, he's always proud, of course; but I mean proud of his socialist icon countries. They know that socialism is never enough: more socialism is always needed.
3 comments:
As Oleg Atbashian at the People's Cube once satirized "We cure weak liberalism with strong Communism."
Just ran across the following at Tumblr. Too good to to share. A RadFem SJW insists:
When a woman gives an opinion you don't agree with, pretend you agree. Because when a woman hears "no, you're wrong", we get scared. The amount of rape culture in this world means that we take it as a sign you're silencing us. And if you continue to do so just because you arrogantly believe a woman is wrong, then it's a slippery slope to misogyny and abuse.
It occurs to me that the attitude expressed in the Tumblr post is a sort of inverse ad hominem: rather than attacking the person to undermine the idea, the personhood of the claimant is asserted in order to grant unassailable status to the opinion expressed. No opinion, however ludicrous, is subject to criticism as long as it is expressed by a woman.
I find this attitude insulting.
Post a Comment