Friday, November 21, 2014

Thomas Sowell on Education Today

A sizable excerpt from Sowell's article at National Review:
Academia’s Unexamined Assumptions

"There is a remarkable range of ways of seeming to argue without actually producing any coherent argument.

Decades of dumbed-down education no doubt have something to do with this, but there is more to it than that. Education is not merely neglected in many of our schools today, but is replaced to a great extent by ideological indoctrination. Moreover, it is largely indoctrination based on the same set of underlying and unexamined assumptions among teachers and institutions.

If our educational institutions — from the schools to the universities — were as interested in a diversity of ideas as they are obsessed with racial diversity, students would at least gain experience in seeing the assumptions behind different visions and the role of logic and evidence in debating those differences.

Instead, a student can go all the way from elementary school to a Ph.D. without encountering any vision of the world that’s fundamentally different from the prevailing political correctness. Moreover, the moral perspective that goes with this prevailing ideological view is all too often that of people who see themselves as being on the side of the angels against the forces of evil — whether the particular issue at hand is gun control, environmentalism, race, or whatever.

A moral monopoly is the antithesis of a marketplace of ideas. One sign of this sense of moral monopoly among the left intelligentsia is that the institutions most under their control — the schools, colleges, and universities — have far less freedom of speech than the rest of American society.

While advocacy of homosexuality, for example, is common on college campuses, and listening to this advocacy is often obligatory during freshman orientation, criticism of homosexuality is called “hate speech” and is subject to punishment.

While spokesmen for various racial or ethnic groups are free to vehemently denounce whites as a group for their past or present sins, real or otherwise, any white student who similarly denounces the sins or shortcomings of non-white groups can be virtually guaranteed to be punished, if not expelled.

Even students who do not advocate anything may have to pay a price if they do not go along with classroom brainwashing. The student at Florida Atlantic University who recently declined to stomp on a paper with the word “Jesus” on it, as ordered by the professor, was scheduled for punishment by the university until the story became public and provoked an outcry from outside of academia.

This professor’s action might be dismissed as an isolated extreme, but the university establishment’s initial solid backing for him, and its coming down hard on the student, shows that the moral dry rot goes far deeper than one brainwashing professor.

The failure of our educational system goes beyond what they fail to teach. It includes what they do teach, or rather indoctrinate, and the graduates they send out into the world who are incapable of seriously weighing alternatives for themselves or for American society."
Their primary unexamined assumption is that of their own personal superiority in all things, as demi-gods in demi-domains. It's a cultural narcissistic disorder.

2 comments:

Steven Satak said...

They are sawing off the branch that supports them, and exulting in it with insane glee. I only hope I was able to shield my son from the rot.

Speaking of rot...

Have you seen this?

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2012/03/after_birth_abortion_the_pro_choice_case_for_infanticide_.html

Old article, fer sure. But what's interesting is that Slate is a bastion of LeftThink. And yet this came up, and the author frankly expressed serious reservations about the case for infanticide.

He/she recognized the slippery slope and that the reasons used to justify abortion as 'not-murder' could be used to justify aborting a human at ANY stage of development.

All that was required was that the aborters be given legal protection and the ability to force the 'subject' into conforming to the whim of the aborters - against the 'subject's' will.

As it was published in 2012 and I have not seen any ripples from it elsewhere on the web, I can only conclude the Left has swallowed this obviously monstrous conclusion with so much else that is self-destructive and contradictory, by imagining that they will be the ones applying, not the ones being held to, this new, utterly repellent consequentialist morality.

After all, if being born does not grant you 'true status as a human being' - if it is dependent on the subjective preference of some person politically appointed over you, what prevents them from euthanizing you for thoughtcrime?

Stan said...

It's only because I'm armed...