The War on Freedom of Speech and Western Values

It might seem odd that a cartoon could incite war. It's not that common in historical wars. However, ideology is.

So what we have here is an ideology which is asserting its rights over western rights. Force is the now-anticipated reaction to the now world famous Hebdo cartoon by Luz depicting a weeping Muhammad saying "all is forgiven", a response to the Islamic massacre of Hebdo and 16 others due to a prior cartoon.

The defiance of the west (sans the western Leftists naturally) against the demands of the Islamists is both a stroke for western freedoms and at the same time an expectation of war from the Islamist enforcers who will force the coming violence in the name of the Religion of Peace.

But the Imam, Anjem Choudary, who has called the latest cartoon an act of war, denies that Islam equates to peace:

"Soon after the murders, he issued an open letter in which he said:

“Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.”

Many western institutions, primarily Leftist media, have immediately caved to the ransom demands (cancel free speech or you die). Some have not.

It should be perfectly clear. Islamic rights will supercede western rights, first by demand on pain of death and "war", or they will be forced to supercede western rights by blood-letting, which is also the Islamic right, as practiced by Muhammad and infects the history of Islam for a millenium and a half. In fact, massacres can be justified as moral under Islam.

"He claimed the latest front cover was “blatant provocation” and claimed insulting Islam and Muslims is “part of the war that is taking place”. He went on to demand that Western societies be “sensible and sensitive to the emotions and the feelings of the Muslims”, and accused governments of refusing to “nip it in the bud”."

What is meant by "emotions and feelings of the Muslims", is that they not be "provoked" from mere agitation over the existence of the west, into their more common state of explosion. They must be appeased to keep them from exhibiting their native barbarism.

This statement by the Imam is the most congruent allusion to the Islam we observe empirically which has been made, considering the observable facts. It stands out amongst the treacherous "peaceable religion" propaganda that is constantly hosed upon us by both the western Left and Islamists themselves. Muhammad was in no manner peaceable, except to those sycophants around him; and those sycophants carried out the eliminationist orders of Muhammad, joyfully killing those who were "problematic" for the prophet. It's all part and parcel of Muhammad-worship.

Our choice in the west is capitulation or defense of our freedoms including those freedoms which Islamists hate. The fact that those freedoms exist and are exercised is the fact that will bring the west to full war against Islam, which will try to eradicate western culture at its roots.