Feminist: I Stand By My Decision To Abort My Baby Because It Was Male"This woman’s story and her morally-twisted rationalizations for her abortion is a very revealing insight into the perversion that constitutes “pro-choice.” Lana justifies her decision to abort her preborn child after an “incident” on an airplane- clarifying her position that men can’t be depended on for the “cause” of feminism.
From Injustice Stories (which is ironic considering the injustice of this woman’s decision and actions)-
One of the more alarming incidents happened while I was on my way to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. I sat down in my seat on the plane, which happened to be extra full for that day, and a particularly well dressed man happened to be sitting in the seat beside me, in the aisle. After takeoff, he asked me what I was going to San Francisco for, while I generally wouldn’t talk to a man sitting next to me on an airplane, I told him I was going to the OWS rally.
The man literally scoffed when I spoke those words and leaned in and quietly said to me “B****** like you need to learn their place”. Stunned, I screamed “ASSAULT!” while other passengers looked at us, the woman across the aisle from him immediately told him to get away from me, but not 5 seconds passed before a flight attendant had rushed over to intervene….
*Trigger warning* – Extreme patriarchy
…The woman-hater just laughed as the flight attendant continued to press me on if he made any physical contact with me. For a moment, I contemplated bending the truth in order to get the woman-hater away from me. His words had violated both my feelings, and my trust, perhaps as much of a violation as actual physical touch. In the end, I confirmed that no physical contact was made, to which both flight attendants told me they couldn’t make him move.
Aside from Lana’s petulance (screaming assault? Really?), she was tempted to lie about what happened because she felt entitled to be in a “safe space” away from a “woman-hater” because her feelings were hurt violated. Lana goes on to describe the incident as making her feel that she had been verbally and emotionally raped.“What?” I managed to sputter. Sandy then showed me on the ultrasound how exactly my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.
What a way to trivialize rape.
After five months of pregnancy Lana goes to her doctor for a check-up and discovers that her baby is a boy. Lana’s reaction-
In Lana’s perverted mind, her body “betrayed” her. Sweetheart the fact that you’re pregnant by definition means that the baby isn’t your body. For Lana, bringing a healthy baby boy into the world is a “curse” that has to be mitigated. So Lana makes- in her twisted mind- the “logical” decision to murder her baby.[I] started regaining some of my mental strength and knew what I had to do. I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is. It didn’t matter that I would be raising a son, he would still come into contact with boys, men, perhaps even the suit jockey who would inevitably twist his carefully constructed upbringing with their kindness.
…
A few days later, I went in for the procedure, as it was fairly later in my pregnancy, I was aware there were certain risks, but it went off without a hitch. My body’s betrayal was no more, I was free, and for the first time since the airplane incident, I felt strong. I had done something positive, something that would actually make a difference, something good, even though as I would find out, many others wouldn’t see it that way."
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
Feminist Aborts Baby Because It Was Male
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I don't believe for a moment that some random dude on an airplane said "Bitch you need to learn your place." This is a wholly made up fantasy that she probably concocted in her twisted head while the plane flew and the demons inside started playing havoc with little grey matter was between her ears.
This country's prosperity has indeed lead to a level of debauchery that even I, in my oft criticized pessimism couldn't have predicted. The abolition of morality has indeed mirrored the abolition of sense.
@ Rikalonius: agreed. That sounds like a line from a very shoddy movie.
She sounds extremely irrational. I wonder what she would do if she were actually assaulted? She seems to have already used up all the responses on crying 'Wolf!' to every imagined microaggression.
Sounds like a bag-lady in training, you ask me. This sort of thing - killing your own kid because he's a boy - doesn't end well. Especially when, rather than express remorse, you boast of it as a blow for feminists everywhere.
I'm new to blogging and to this blog in particular, but I like what you're doing, and I'm very impressed with your analyses. Regarding this specific post, I imagine it doesn't even cross Lana's mind that her obvious hatred of males is every bit as evil as the hatred she accuses men (even unborn ones) of having toward women. How did she get pregnant, if not by the genetic material of a man?
Eddie,
Welcome, and please feel free to stick around and contribute as you feel like it.
Stan
She apparently was impregnated with ideological insanity. Unfortunately for her, her body "betrayed" her, creating XY chromosomes from XX materials.
My question:
If it was her body that "betrayed" her, why not destroy it for its betrayal?
That would have been logically consistent with her insane ideology.
Alas! I guess her insanity does not allow for logic, or logical consistency.
The story has been disproved. Snopes pretty much shot it down.
The Snopes.com verdict: Probably false
1. A (proudly) unemployed woman in first class, traveling to an Occupy Wall Street event in San Francisco.
2. Termination of the pregnancy in the fifth month "without a hitch."
3. "Missing from the account were any identifying details about the time frame in which the purported abortion occurred, the general locality, or any other details or information regarding the procedure."
4. The Injustice Stories "domain was registered on the same day Lana's story was posted. Furthermore, in order to read the entirety of the article, site visitors were forced to share the page on social media (which in turn boosted its visibility incrementally before it caught the eye of larger news sources). The tale's lack of plausibility, combined with the use of a brand-new site to publish it, indicated the account was likely a troll for pageviews, not a real-life account representing the sordid state of feminism. While many skeptical readers believed the hoax was aimed at promoting an anti-abortion agenda, it's also possible the site's purveyor fabricated the tale primarily to generate outrage-based clicks."
Emily Litela (SNL):
Never mind!
Link: Wrongful Termination
Well good. I'm glad that's the case, if it is the case.
However, it is fairly easy to see that actually happening, given the general eliminationist trend in feminism today.
Post a Comment