Thursday, March 12, 2015

Another H R Clinton Lie

Clinton was required to sign document claiming she turned over emails in 2013

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, like all departing federal employees, was required to fill out and sign a separation statement affirming that she had turned over all classified and other government documents, including all emails dealing with official business.

Fox News Megyn Kelly reported Wednesday evening on the requirement and that a spokesman for Clinton had not responded to a request for comment, including an explanation of when the former chief U.S. diplomat signed the mandatory separation agreement or, if she didn't, why didn't she.

The Washington Examiner also asked Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill for comment late Wednesday but had received no response from him early Thursday. Clinton did not respond when asked about the issue earlier this week by the Associated Press. The issue was first raised Monday by Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus"
It's just what they do, who they are: they lie, and they are liars, even on official documents. It is interesting that the MSM has turned on Hillary, unlike their undiminished fealty to the half-black president.

1 comment:

Robert Coble said...

I've had an ongoing discussion with a resident Progressive Millennial at work regarding lying politicians, including the HildeBeast.

It is an amusing and highly frustrating process. One of us will mention some scandal of the day. His immediate point is that it is ALWAYS "Republicans." I'll counter with simple facts from his favorite sources of bias - the mainstream media. He will evade by trying to change topics. I force him to acknowledge that the person in question LIED - blatantly. Think Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Biden and Gruber, for a few cogent examples. (That often takes quite a few iterations of forcing him to return to the original subject.) Finally, he will grudgingly allow that I "might" have a point. I continue to force the exchange until he admits unequivocally that he was lied to. At that point, I ask why he continues to believe and support those liars. That immediately brings him full circle back to "Republicans" - and the evasions start all over again.

It is funny to watch him start with a position of "I'm 100% in favor of ALL Progressive ideas and politicians," ratchet down the percentage as the discussion of FACTS continues, to (sometimes) as low as 50%, only to finally arrive at "100% Progressive" as the crowning conclusion.

Logical consistency is not required.