Sunday, April 19, 2015

More Failed "Science"

Science is only as good as those who are entrusted with it.
FBI overstated forensic hair matches in nearly all trials before 2000

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.

Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the country’s largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.

The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison, the groups said under an agreement with the government to release results after the review of the first 200 convictions.

The FBI errors alone do not mean there was not other evidence of a convict’s guilt. Defendants and federal and state prosecutors in 46 states and the District are being notified to determine whether there are grounds for appeals. Four defendants were previously exonerated.

The admissions mark a watershed in one of the country’s largest forensic scandals, highlighting the failure of the nation’s courts for decades to keep bogus scientific information from juries, legal analysts said. The question now, they said, is how state authorities and the courts will respond to findings that confirm long-suspected problems with subjective, pattern-based forensic techniques — like hair and bite-mark comparisons — that have contributed to wrongful convictions in more than one-quarter of 329 DNA-exoneration cases since 1989."
26 of 28 FBI examiners should be prosecuted for their crimes. It appears that many federal agencies are at least as dangerous as those they are supposed to supervise. And now they are all equipped with their own armies.

1 comment:

Robert Coble said...

I'm willing to bet you that not ONE of the 26 will ever be indicted, much less tried before a jury of their putative peers, even in those cases where the defendant is deceased as a result of the malfeasance of the state's employees.

As a somewhat infamous lawyer (who laughed about getting a child rapist off, even though she considered him guilty) opined:

"What difference at this point does it make?"