"Science" says humans share somewhere around 98 to 99%... oops, now its only 95% DNA with chimpanzees.
"Science" says modern Europeans and Asians share only 2% DNA with Neanderthals.
"Science" says humans share 60% DNA with mice.
"Science" says humans share 50% DNA with bananas.
Obviously Neanderthals lost out in the DNA race. But wait...
"Science" says Neanderthals and Homosapiens interbred.
Now is it possible to interbreed with a chimp... or a banana? Can I be a trans-chimp? or a trans-banana? I say yes, and I demand respect for my new identity!
6 comments:
According to National Geographic,Everyone living outside of Africa today has a small amount of Neanderthal in them, carried as a living relic of these ancient encounters. A team of scientists comparing the full genomes of the two species concluded that most Europeans and Asians have between 1 to 4 percent Neanderthal DNA. Indigenous sub-Saharan Africans have no Neanderthal DNA because their ancestors did not migrate through Eurasia...According to one theory, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern humans are all descended from the ancient human Homo heidelbergensis..
Logically,this does not add up.
If A (African) is the superset of subsets B (Neanderthal) & C (Denisovan) then all elements contained within the subsets are also present within the superset A (African).Yet these scientists are claiming that there exists elements within the subset not found in its superset.
Another approach to this theory is that all humans (non-negroids) have a common ancestor which is the black african.The black african did not evolve because he did not migrate.Therefore all evolved humans are not black african.
I know this could easily be misconstrued as racist but unfortunately this is the full logical conlcusion of evolution science.Unless evolve in this context merely means "change" and not "progress".
Well, it looks like "scientists" are getting paid to advance some agenda again. Isn't it wonderful (lol)?
Typo:
I meant:Another approach to this theory is that all "evolved" humans (non-negroids) have a common ancestor
I haven't spent much time investigating the latest positions on human evolution, and I'll get to it but not immediately. I'm still fascinated by the structure of the basic cell, and how that necessary structure falsifies materialist theories completely. I've got more to write on that. Falsifying materialism with material science leads to the falsification of Atheism and evolution, and the basis for Leftism, which is amoral will-to-power.
If evolution can be proven wrong on the basis of falsifying materialism and therefore opening evolution to contrary hypotheses outside of materialism, then the entire materialist culture can be shown to be swamped by its own logic error. It is essential to do that, because it obviously is the case. There is no rational basis for materialism, Atheism or Leftism: they are all predicated on logic errors.
I doubt that many SJWs care about logic or their own errors. But there are undoubtedly many others who do care, and are searching for definitive answers.
Stan
If you could write an article on human evolution and clear up some issues,that would be great.The implications drawn from some of the 'data' seems too offensive,so either discarding the data or finding some other interpretation appears to be the more prudent approach.Or we could just accept the facts for what they are.ie Some human races are more evolved than others.
On Vox Popoli (Vox Day's site), there is a very interesting series of articles on evolution, which can be accessed here:
Link: Evolution
Apropos this particular post, read the article "Evolution or equality." It is the third article from the top.
It spells out the contradiction between the standard theory of evolutionary and the belief in (despite considerable contrary evidence) "blank-slate cognitive equality among human groups of different continental origins."
The money quote: "Subscribing to both evolution and equality is intrinsically nonsensical."
This is a prime illustration of the cognitive dissonance that must be held in the mind of the AtheoLeftist. She will hold contradictory positions on a wide variety of subjects, without ever realizing that some of those positions contradict other positions. When the contradictions are pointed out, the typical Emily Litella response is "Never mind," followed by a repeat performance.
I have never understood how a rational human being can passionately hold blatantly contradictory beliefs simultaneously, especially when the contradiction is made explicit. Perhaps it is because of my charitable assumption (contra the evidence) that the one holding such contradictions is rational.
Another blatant contradiction is the assertion of the need for the Messiah Class to hold the One Ring in perpetuity and simultaneously to declare the "equality" of all Victim Classes.
Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
"In the darkness bind them" - INDEED!
Post a Comment