A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
I was cautiously in favor of Perry, based on the success of Texas in the face of the disasters of Blue Model states. No more. When this sort of nasty, virulent attack on a non-Democrat comes out, then the establishment nature of the attacker comes into focus. Trump, it appears, is too honest in stating his opinions: establishment politicians don't do that and DO NOT LIKE that. My opinion is that we don't need anymore politicians who protect the establishment. We need someone to protect the USA and its people. Whether Trump would do that is not clear. But at least he says what he thinks, outside the rigid boudaries of political establishment protocol. That's bound to be iconoclastic, and very interesting to watch. If Trump needed donations, I would donate just to keep the entertainment coming.