Friday, July 17, 2015

Planned Parenthood Exec Responds

Planned Parenthood apologizes for exec's 'tone' in video

"The president of Planned Parenthood on Thursday apologized for the “tone and statements” of its chief medical officer, whose candid comments about fetal organ removal have generated heavy attacks against the organization.

“Our top priority is the passionate care that we provide. In our video, one of our staff members speaks in a way that does not reflect that compassion,” president Cecile Richards said in a video statement released Thursday afternoon."


In the video, Richards also doubles down on her defense of fetal tissue donation — which she said contributes to “life-saving research.” She said the donations are only done with the woman’s consent and never for profit.

“I want to be really clear. The allegation that Planned Parenthood profits in any way from tissue donation is not true,” Richards adds.

This is the best comment at the site:
"Stirring up a babies brain with a set of forceps is one thing....but lack of a professional tone......whoaaaaaaaa!"

My favorite concept is that one can shred an innocent preborn human for "life-saving research". But it's OK if they pretend that don't realize an actual profit, other than the billions they have gotten from taxpayers, courtesy of Congressional Leftists. Of course, being a Dark Entity, with no oversight, we'll never know for certain. They are essentially a secret killing operation which we, every tax-paying American, are forced to fund.

With killing being one of the first of the New Rights demanded by the Left, there is no rational limit to New Rights which they will demand in the future. As I understand it, the New Right to Kill death toll is now greater than 57,000,000 shredded, dead preborn humans in the USA. That's a lot of bloody baby parts (aka "fetal tissue") available "for life-saving research".

As an aside, one commenter takes issue with the term, "dead preborn humans"; which of these terms, "dead", "preborn", or "human" is false? Apparently it is too graphically correct to be considered appropriate in a genteel conversation. Otherwise, the dead tissue-contributer is not human, because: redefinition and logic chopping. But the need for human baby body parts exactly and precisely refutes the argument that the shredded tissue-generator was not human: if not human, then his/her body parts are not suitable for saving human lives.

When a concept is irrational, as well as brutalizing, it cannot be other than immoral in any rational worldview.

No comments: