The very act grabbing and threatening physical harm is a specific refutation of the "femaleness" of the fake woman. The entire panel, save Shapiro, is highly engaged in the narrative of "your words are violence; my violence is justified by your words". No one on the panel objects to the threat. As Klavan points out, that is the logic of fascism and bullies:
"The logic of fascism is this: “Your X constitute[s] an act of violence, so I’m justified in using violence against you.” For X, you can fill in just about anything except actual violence. Some of the more popular choices are: “Words; Opinions; Positions; Race; Presence; Borders; Jewishness.” Once you equate any of these things — anything — with violence, once you feel justified in committing violence in response, your actual positions no longer matter. You’re a thug. You’re a fascist. You’re a tyrant, petty or otherwise. You no longer have a place at the discussion table."I think that it is more general than merely fascism. It is Progressivism, which in its current form includes all totalitarianism in the spectrum from from fascism to Islamism. That includes the Marxist/Stalinists culture reformers who are indiscernable from National Socialists in their methodology. Cultural Bolshevism is in full play in the MSM.
Shapiro maintained his composure despite the threat from the much larger man-woman. The "gender overrides genetics" issue being defended loudly orally was completely falsified by the threat of the man in woman's clothes who behaved as a large male bully behaves, not a woman. Few if any women get in a man's face and confidently promise to "send him home in an ambulance".
From this it might be concluded that the gender-sex disconnect is actually in the man-woman's brain: he wants to be a she, but he still acts like a he. So his actions behave genetically (male), while his emotional preference is to be female. Something in the brain (or mind) is incompatible with something else in the brain. If this disconnect is genetic, then it is a mutation of a sort which is of a devolving nature. It cannot convey procreative benefits. From an evolutionary standpoint the mutation is deleterious and under normal circumstances it would be deselected.
The major fascist/socialist/progressive movements of the past century have taken the opposite position on such mutations: they opted to eliminate them by force: legal force. Now the Progressive/socialist/SJW movements endorse these mutations to the point of threats of violence upon those who support everything previously considered normal. The mere act of refusal to accept abnormality as normal is enough to invite threats of violence or legal actions upon oneself. This will get worse before it gets better, if it ever gets better.
But the ramp up to the overt threat of physical damage to Shapiro is interesting as well. From the "black perspective", Jenner is seen as "privileged" and therefore is an obscene cultural icon which discriminates against poor black trannies who are unprivileged. Jenner is white and wealthy; therefore he is irredeemably in the Oppressor Class from the black Victimhood view. There is no end to the Victimhood pleading in the culture war of today, including the denigration of one Victimhood class by another Victimhood Class. As always, the socialistas eat themselves.
Shapiro is both right and wrong: the fake woman-man cannot be a woman, no matter how threatening he is to critics. He is still XY, still heavy in testosterone, and unless surgically modified, still has male genitalia. But part of his/her brain is disconnected from that reality; it believes itself to be female when the reality is that it is in a male body with male behaviors. The actual reality is that this indicates that there is an abnormality, which if genetic, is a deleterious mutation.
But one may not speak that truth.
If the disconnect is in the mind, then it is an emotional defect which is very likely correctable.
But one may not speak that truth, either.
It's no secret why it is that Leftists become irate when they hear the truths that may not be spoken: the Leftist narrative is sacred; contradicting the Leftist narrative is therefore evil, dangerous, heretical, and cannot be allowed into the light of day. To violate the narrative is to "go home in an ambulance".