Monday, November 16, 2015

Snippets of Perspective

Piers Morgan:
"These murderers aren't refugees. Nor are they real Muslims. They're terrorists who've hijacked a religion for nefarious gain.
David Burge:
ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has a PhD in Islamic theology from Islamic U of Baghdad. What are your credentials?"
Greg Gutfield:
“a swastika drawn in poop in a shower now finds its appropriate place in the ladder of moral priority”
Soopermexican:
UN-EFFING-BELIEVABLE! Mizzou protesters are angry Paris terror attacks stole their media spotlight.
Roger Simon:
"We are living at a time when the Islamic world is having a nervous breakdown, actually more like a violent psychotic break, in its encounter with modernity and is determined to bring us all down with it.
Plus a suggestion: “if you want to prove you are the right commander-in-chief, here’s an idea for you, Donald. Get on one of your private jets and fly to Paris. Act presidential, even if the actual president doesn’t.”

Hollande:
‘We are going to lead a war which will be pitiless,’” the Washington Examiner
Allahpundit:
“Exhibit A in why I keep saying nothing will change. War has already been declared. And?”
QUOTES OF THE DAY:
“We Have Contained Them.” Barak Hussein Obama

"Feinstein Contradicts Obama: ISIS ‘Is Not Contained,’ It’s ‘Expanding’

Obama's War Plan
“No challenge poses a greater threat to our future than climate change,” Barak Hussein Obama, August, 2015

"OBAMA: “WHAT I’M NOT INTERESTED IN DOING IS POSING OR PURSUING SOME NOTION OF AMERICAN LEADERSHIP OR AMERICA WINNING:”, Barak Hussein Obama, November 15,2015
Time.com:
Congressmen in Brazil, one of the most violent countries in the world, are proposing to dramatically loosen restrictions on personal gun ownership, bringing the country much closer to the American right to bear arms.
The politicians say the measures are necessary to allow embattled citizens the right to defend themselves from criminals armed with illegal weapons. But opponents say the move will only increase the country’s toll of nearly 60,000 murders in 2014.
Instapundit: Matthew Continetti writes at the Washington Free Beacon:
I don’t know if he invented it, but it was through Tom Wolfe’s 1973 anthology The New Journalism that I discovered the phrase “Muggeridge’s Law,” named after British author Malcolm Muggeridge. As Wolfe wrote, “We live in an age in which it is no longer possible to be funny. There is nothing you can imagine, no matter how ludicrous, that will not promptly be enacted before your very eyes, probably by someone well known.”
Jonah Goldberg:
"Because this “crisis” is 100 percent liberalism’s fault. Sure, sure, you can divvy up the slices of blame in different ways, but those guys tailgating in the parking lot drinking beers and eating bratwurst? Those are the conservatives and libertarians enjoying a day off, because they don’t have to wait in line for even a morsel of blame."
National Review:
THINKING CHROMOSOMES INDICATE BIOLOGICAL SEX DECLARED ‘INACCURATE’ AND ‘CISSEXIST.’
Glenn Reynolds:
UNEXPECTEDLY: “The three candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination had different ideas at Saturday night’s Iowa debate about what to call terrorists — but they wanted to leave ‘Islamist’ out of any descriptor.”
"If he [Obama] hated terrorists half as much as he hates Republicans then maybe ISIS wouldn’t control half the middle east.”

2 comments:

JBsptfn said...

You have to check this podcast out:

Dubsism Dubscast page

The most recent podcast is at the top. This guy thinks that the poop swastika thing was fake because there were no pictures. He also compares this situation to what happened in China in the 30's.

Besides the most recent one at the top, you should check out episode 24 (he goes on a rant about cops at the 35:00 mark), 13 (he talks about the American media) and 12 (he talks about what is going on in this country). J-Dub says some interesting things.

Phoenix said...

For terrorists to have hijacked Islam means they are misquoting verses and taking them out of context, according to muslim apologists and Leftists. But when pressed for the supposed "proper" context then these guys will pull a Houdini. No apologist has ever shared the correct context.