Saturday, December 12, 2015

Every City, Same Time?

Report: San Bernardino gunman's pal spoke of "sleeper cells"

"He would say stuff like: 'There's so much going on. There's so many sleeper cells, so many people just waiting. When it happens, it's going to be big. Watch,'"
This is anecdotal but possible. We know for certain that it's happened once. I don't know why that was such a shock, because it happened before: 9/11. And it happened before that: the first WTC basement bombers.

So all the politicians except Trump want to let more in. Look: it's not the victim's fault that they were killed. It's also not future victim's fault when they are killed. So whose fault is it? Who has not protected and closed the borders effectively to prevent the entry of killers?

My answer to that is this: the voters who, out of racial cowardice, voted Obama into a second term. In other words, the PC crowd who refused to look at either his personal or professional history or his actions during his first term, and voted for the "black man". I.e., the racialists.

Either of the Pres. Roosevelts would have closed the borders. Harry Truman would have. JFK would have. LBJ would have. Today's RINOs and Democrats are so far to the Left that they have left sanity far, far behind.

Consider this: Even the "peaceful" Muslims are at war with the "literalist" Muslims. So why do they want more potential sleeper cells? Because that is what they are asking for.


Robert Coble said...

"So why do they want more potential sleeper cells?"

Perhaps that is intended to be a rhetorical question. Here's a possibility.

"Never let a good crisis go to waste."

I'm not a conspiracy theorist by a long shot, but I believe that Barack INSANE Obama and Crew WILL exploit any crisis to maintain and extend power. Already he is talking about using Executive Orders to circumvent 2nd Amendment protections in order to provide more gun control, in spite of the Congress, the Supreme Court and the American people being overwhelmingly against any such action, and that none of the proposed Executive Orders or gun control laws would have prevented the San Bernardino massacre from happening. If there are more Islamic terrorist massacres (and there most definitely WILL BE MORE if the invasion is allowed to continue), then there will continue to be a backlash from the American people. Eventually, if it continues to build, there will be open rebellion. THAT will be the justification for imposition of the benevolent (HAH!) dictatorship imposed through a declaration of martial law in order to put down the "rebellion." Given he only has a little over one year to remain in power legitimately under the now ignored Constitution, expect the pace to be accelerated. There must be a pretext of some sort in order to keep the undereducated from grasping the significance of the power grab. The minority opposing the power grab will disappear into the new system of gulags, er, re-education camps, if not simply shot on sight.

As far-fetched as this sounds, consider the injection of the DOJ Community Relations Service into situations like Fergusun MO. Quoting the DOJ Web site:

The Community Relations Service is the Department's "Peacemaker" for community conflicts and tensions arising from differences of race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion and disability. CRS is not an investigatory or prosecutorial agency, and it does not have any law enforcement authority.

This organization foments unrest, seeking out controversial situations in order to inflame the situation. It ain't because of any desire for conflict resolution.

Given the DOJ mission statement:

"To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans."

No re-read the CRS statement, particularly this part of it:

"CRS is not an investigatory or prosecutorial agency, and it does not have any law enforcement authority.

It has NO legitimate purpose within the mission of the DOJ.

Robert Coble said...

"No re-read the CRS statement," should have been "Now re-read the CRS statement," - the old fingers missed a letter.