Tuesday, March 15, 2016

And Now the Real Fun Begins: Media Hoaxing Trump Violence

The Michelle Fields Media Hoax, and Why They Were Caught
For SJWs, all contrary opinions are "violence" and "unsafe". This is now the strategy being used against Trump, as with the threats of assassination against Trump which are - of course - caused by Trump himself by holding "violent opinions". Trump's opinions are also the cause of the violent demonstration being held against his appearance at a rally, forcing him to cancel for the safety of his supporters. It's the old abuser theme: "She forced me to beat her to death - what else could I do?" Trump is "forcing them" to riot and to lie about being "assaulted"... and forcing the media not to report the true events. The cuckservative rivals of Trump piled on:
"Friday evening’s Donald Trump rally in Chicago was broken up by a foul-mouthed mob that infiltrated the hall and forced the cancellation of the event to prevent violence and bloodshed.

Brownshirt tactics worked. The mob, triumphant, rejoiced.

And the reaction of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and John Kasich?

All three Republican rivals blamed – Donald Trump.

With his “dangerous style of leadership,” Trump stokes this anger, mewed Rubio, “This is what happens when a leading presidential candidate goes around feeding into a narrative of bitterness and anger and frustration.”

Rubio implies that if Trump doesn’t tone down his remarks to pacify the rabble, he will be responsible for the violence visited upon him.

Kasich echoed Rubio: “Donald Trump has created a toxic environment (that) has allowed his supporters and those who sometimes seek confrontation to come together in violence.”

But were the thousands of Trump supporters who came out to cheer him that night really looking for a fight? Or were they exercising their right of peaceful assembly?

Cruz charged Trump with “creating an environment that only encourages this sort of nasty discord,” thus offering absolution to the mob.
"
No "free speech" here. Rubio, Kashich and Whassisname... Cruz, all legitimized the rioters. Why do the Republicans always field scum as "presidential contenders"?

It will get worse and more interesting; get more popcorn. And find your Safe Place as the media will advise you when the Trump-caused violence against Trump and his supporters becomes a rosy glow on a smoke darkened horizon near you.

11 comments:

Robert Coble said...

Stan:

FWIW: The presentation colors on the blog seem to have changed. The posts seem much harder to read with the new color scheme. Just a personal observation. . .

Xellos said...

"Why do the Republicans always field scum as "presidential contenders"?"

Why would a decent person run as an establishment candidate?
:^)

It gets much more fun with Breitbart suspending their reporter Patrick Howley for questioning whether Fields's claims are automatically true (asking for a video). Listen and believe, folks.

And Ben Shapiro resigning... salt level: industrial catastrophe.

Steven Satak said...

Next thing, Rubio, Cruz and the rest will be insisting that the fucking Jews were responsible for the Holocaust. Which will correctly identify them as conservative retards, but automatically puts them in the same bag as the Leftists.

I bet the Left is having an orgasm over this. To drag your opponents down into the irrational nihilistic nightmare that is occupied by the Left using the old tactic of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"... damn, I can hear old Scratch laughing from here.

That tears it, though. When he stokes such OUTRAGE in BOTH parties, to the point where they both use the same scumbag underhanded brand of crap, Trump has got to be doing something right. I was on the fence with a sore crotch, but now I've decided that, supposing he does not get assassinated, I am voting for Donald Trump.

yonose said...

Hello everyone!!

If all what you say here is true (well, I'm just not sure about all this mess, my doubts not badly intended), I just hope Trump is not one to be too harsh with honest, hardworking, Latin-american citizens.

Kind Regards.

Stan said...

Robert,
I finally loaded in Windows 10, and immediately everything turned into (pardon the expletive): Microsoft.

I have used a different computer to change the blog settings back as close to where they were as I can. Let me know if it is at least legible now, if you get the chance - thanks.

yonose said...

Stan,

That's why I don't use Windows at home anymore (and soon not at work), or at least, almost never!! ;)

Kind Regards.

Robert Coble said...

Stan:

Much better! Thank you!

I got the GETWINDOWS10LOADER program, ran it, and - nothing happened. I finally searched on HP's site and found that my computer is too old for Windows 10. I'm beginning to be thankful for that!

Strange but true: the general consensus among systems admins is that you skip every other operating system release. Why? Because the "geniuses" put all kinds of "improvements" into one version, and then have to fix the problems they created in the next version.

Sounds like politics, doesn't it, except that what one bunch "fixes" the next bunch screws up even worse!

yonose said...

Robert,

The reason I got away from using Windows daily is because, man, it is so much of a hassle to maintain!!

Now that W10 is big-brother all over, I stay with W7, so its another hassle for me to be worried about, its file system fragments more easily in comparison with others even when using SSDs, but well, there are some specific occasions when it is almost certain, that I'll be forced to use it.

Ubuntu, and derivatives are also lacking in quality from recent releases. This is why I only use LTS releases of any of such (actually use PepperMint OS distro, is very conservative with system resources). So, the "consensus" is using LTS releases for anything anyways.

Mac OSX releases get worse when your hardware gets older until support for your Mac Computer (any type of) is gone, among other things which I won't tell here, that actually suck.

The only decent OS regarding design and is barely functional as a Desktop is PC-BSD, though because of its file system (ZFS or UFS), importing and exporting files even using SMB (Samba) or a NAS(more like *BSD should be the NAS itself), is more gruesome and cumbersome than the other alternatives, and unfortunately, it is not widely used.

The reason I use Mac OSX, an Ubuntu Derivative and Mageia much more often, is because those are not such a hassle to maintain and keep'em working.

All in all, all main Operating Systems do suck (yikes!!!)

Kind Regards.

JBsptfn said...

I agree with you about W10, Yonose. I have uninstalled the W10 icons off of our computers.

Hugo Pelland said...

Agreed, the darker blue-ish background made it harder to read; back to being easy now already.

But this has nothing to do with the OS...

Debunking Atheists said...

I saw THIS on FB. Worth adding as a false flag from the democrats.