Hillary Clinton’s ‘unborn person’ comments anger both pro-choice, pro-life sidesC'mon now, we all know that the terms, "unborn person" and "child", actually mean "lump of oppressive tissue which oppresses the woman-victim" - which is an oppressive sexual assault on the woman-victim's body, and which requires woman-victim-healthcare to rid the woman-victim of the oppressor cell-mass using unmonitored surgeries done in subpar clinic/tissue-sales-abbatoirs. Give Hillary a break. She's old. She forgot the official narrative thesaurus. Let's see if the even-older Bernie will let her slide on this screw-up.
Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton ran afoul of both the pro-life and pro-choice sides of the abortion debate Sunday when she said constitutional rights do not apply to an “unborn person” or “child.”
“The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights,” Mrs. Clinton said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Now that doesn’t mean that we don’t do everything we possibly can in the vast majority of instances to, you know, help a mother who is carrying a child and wants to make sure that child will be healthy, to have appropriate medical support.”
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Monday, April 4, 2016
Words Have Meaning: Hillary Betrays the Narrative
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment