Gays are a protected class in the USA, and are a cherished part of the Left's Class War. It will be very interesting to watch the Left as it excuses Islam for this bloodbath. It has to do so, because Islam is another protected class and is cherished by the Left. Yet here is another bit of evidence to be explained away:
Imam Speaking in Orlando Said Gays Must Be Killed Out of 'Compassion'And backlash is feared much more than Islam is feared:
Facebook Deletes Pamela Geller’s ‘Stop Islamization Of America’ Page After Orlando AttackAnd,
Moderators of /r/News, the site’s primary discussion board for breaking news, went on a censorship spree following the Orlando shootings, deleting posts linking the shooter to Islam, as well as hundreds of comments — including one that offered Orlando residents advice on how to donate blood to survivors.And yet,
Afghanistan Migration Surging into America; 99% Support Sharia LawAnd as predictably as maggots to carrion:
Obama: ‘We’ are to blame, not Islamic terrorism, for massacre
"So determined is the president to avoid the subject of Islamist, ISIS-inspired or ISIS-directed terrorism that he concluded his remarks with an astonishing insistence that “we need the strength and courage to change” our attitudes toward the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community.
That’s just disgusting. There’s no other word for it."
6 comments:
Earlier today my liberal niece put out a meme that said, "The Christian-Right has attempted to pass 200 piece of anti-LGBT legislation this year, so try to blame this on Islam. No!"
I wasn't shocked, but that doesn't mean I wasn't troubled. It was predictable, but still mind boggling, that a person who may as well have yelled Allah Ackbar can have the Left spinning vociferously to turn it on Christianity. Of course they were probably salivating because if they can strip away Islam it leaves them with meat for their attack on guns.
And speaking of gross, look what precious Islamic gems I've just stumbled upon: It's ol' Mo with his favorite child bride again.
From the authentic Islamic sources: Hadith Bukhari 1:6:299
(on the authority of his father) 'Aisha said: "Whenever Allah's Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses),he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her." 'Aisha added, "None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could."
Yep, fondling young women during their periods is the height of self-control in Islam. The only other alternative for muslims is to rape them and NOT to leave them alone.
If you think that is weird, there is still another narration from the historical source Tabari where Muhammad lied down next to a dead woman in her grave. Some scholars speculate he may have had sex with the corpse and others assumed he just fondled her because the holy freak had amazing self-control abilities which the ordinary muslim could never muster. Sure, Allah picked a winner.
Sexual assault on a dead corpse would still be necrophilia I do believe. Do you have a full reference to that event? That needs to be elaborated for posterity.
Here's the problem with finding some of these passages that muslims find embarrassing:
1) The are no full hadith and Islamic history books available on the web only partial copies, where the incriminating passages are usually the ones that are missing
2) Some passages are altered to soften their meaning. For example, I remember reading a few years back in sura 3:54 that Allah is the best deceiver.But recently the online quran has been edited and that verse now says "Allah is the best schemer (or plotter)"
Another passage in the hadith relates a story where Muhammad and his companions (Islamic version of disciples) raped captive women in front of their husbands. That has also been edited to the point of being beyond recognition.
Another example is where Muhammad gives his men permission to lie. The word "lie" has been removed and replaced by "say so".
The only way to know for sure is to read the actual books at the library.
Hm. Ok, thanks.
Post a Comment