A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Saturday, January 14, 2017
According to the First Term of Obama...
...to say this about a president is massively RACIST and UNAMERICAN:
According to the Left, it was massively unfair to allow the world to see the (criminal) machinations of the Hillary/MSM corruption and collusion, which no one denies is the Truth about the Democrat campaign. But Trump benefited from the Truth, so he is "illegitimate". This sort of reasoning is so corrupt that it is difficult to analyze without an Appeal to Post Truth and Will To Power as the fundamental cause, along with blatant racism on the part of Lewis.