Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Delingpole's Manifesto

A Lasting and Accurate Analog: The Dogshit Yogurt Fallacy.
Rules for Righties — a War-Winning Manifesto for 2017
Samples of the Manifesto:
"No wonder so many of us had become so fed up with politics: no matter which party you voted for, whether the notionally left-wing one or the notionally right-wing one you still seemed to end up up with the same old vested interests, the same old liberal Establishment elite.

Of course we should always despise the liberal-left because their philosophy is morally bankrupt, dangerous and wrong. But I sometimes think that the people we should despise most of all are the squishes who pretend to be on our side of the argument but forever betray our cause. Sometimes they do this by throwing the more outspoken among us to the wolves in order to signal how tolerant and virtuous they are; sometimes they do this by endorsing some fatuous liberal position in order to show their willingness to compromise.

I call the latter approach the “dogshit yogurt fallacy.”

If conservatives like fruit or honey in their yogurt and liberals prefer to eat it with dogshit, it is NOT a sensible accommodation – much as our centrist conservative columnists might wish it so – to say: “All right. How about we eat our yogurt with a little bit of both?”
We need to understand, very clearly, that there are such things as right and wrong; and that, furthermore, it is always worth fighting to the bitter end for the right thing rather than accepting second best because a bunch of lawyers and politicians and hairdressers from Brazil and squishy newspaper columnists and other members of the liberal elite have told us that second best is the best we can hope for."

And this:
"We will never apologise, never explain, never surrender

See those scalped corpses, littering the plains? These are the guys – and it is, invariably, men – who thought that if only they showed contrition for their confected crimes the enemy would leave them alone. Sir Tim Hunt apologised, the guy from Saatchi apologised, the guy on the Rosetta space programme who wore the “sexist” shirt apologised. A fat lot of good it did them. The vengeful liberal-left doesn’t just want humiliation – it wants total annihilation.

Giving even an inch of ground to an enemy so implacable and vile is not only futile – but it also badly lets the side down by granting them a power that they do not deserve. The most recent sorry example of this was Steve Martin who actually deleted a tweet praising his late friend Carrie Fisher as a “beautiful creature” because a bunch of feminazis on Twitter complained that this was sexist objectification.

Look, I know it’s a scary thing when the SJW witch-hunt mob turns on you. But read Vox Day’s SJW Attack Survival Guide, follow the example of Nigel Farage and fight these people to the very last bullet (keeping the final round for yourself). Do not surrender! (And if you need reminding why not, read this piece I wrote the other day, of which I am very proud)"

Much More at the Site.

6 comments:

  1. Are conservatives expected to protect other conservatives simply for being outspoken? If so, then an outspoken portion of the alt-right is guilty of treason, attacking other outspoken conservatives, particularly David French with death threats, racial slurs directed @ his adopted 4yo child and posting violent and sexually explicit imagery on his wife's blog @ patheos.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441319/donald-trump-alt-right-internet-abuse-never-trump-movement

    Those comments at National Review defending the behavior suggest portions of the alt-right consider attacking other outspoken conservatives both fair game and a much relished opportunity to stoop to savage levels of ad hominem, vulgarity and racism. This level of irrational discourse is not atypical of the sort seen in the comments at Breitbart, Vox Day and MRA websites. It seems the alt-right are happy to throw outspoken conservatives to the wolves, so long as those wolves voted for Trump.

    You don't save western civilization by burning it to the ground faster than the enemy, but if conservatism is content poisoning itself with the same racial identity politics/tribalism the SJW use, that last bullet (for themselves) is probably a comfort.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many seem not to realize that the war is real, the carnage is real and the consequences are real. Just being nice to the enemy does not work. That said, I don't know who sends death threats on either side. I do know that they are heavily weighted toward the anti-Constitutional Left, as has been shown conclusively this year.

      When you refer to "Conservative", you refer to a brand which does not reflect the true nature of its contents; i.e., a fraudulent title for Leftist-Lite. They have not conserved anything, and have followed the Hegelian path from thesis to synthesis, like dogs being house-broken. They pander to the ultra-rich, as was demonstrated in the past nomination year. They are wholly-owned pols. The Left, of course, is wholly owned by the keepers of the Narrative, which is personified by hate attacks on the voters, again amply demonstrated in the past nomination year.

      White Tribalism was developed by the Democrats 180 years ago, when the Democrat Party was formed in order to preserve slavery of blacks... against the liberation movement which ultimately became the Republican Party. Tribalism was forced upon the nation, and has resulted in the total balkanization of the population. There is no possiblity of compromise with the Tribalist, Marxist, hate mongers.

      Hence, dogshit yogurt is the proper description of the tribalist inability to form common ground.

      I don't think the "last bullet" metaphor works; death will not be by suicide. At least not in my case, and not likely in the case of many of the new, Constitutionalist warriors.

      Delete
  2. Delingpole's first article is an amusing bit of mental masturbation for the alt-conservative self-esteem.

    The "white genocide" tweet is an example of how "ingrained the values of the left are in acadame"? No, it's an example of a despondent, probably intoxicated asshole running his mouth. If you want evidence of the saturation of liberal ideology in colleges, a study demonstrating that will be needed. Studies exist that suggest a liberal bias and show colleges would discriminate against conservative job candidates but I suppose even mentioning real evidence is boring and less interesting than generalizing the typical college liberal as being genocidal and anti-white.

    Liberals brains are "less evolved"? How does he know this? Point and shriek tactics are used by the alt-right as are emotive pejoratives like "cuckservative". These tactics are signs of a poor education, a lack of critical thinking or a "rebuke the other" mindset rather than a "less evolved brain". When a bible-thumping Christian conservative points and shrieks at a gay couple calling them sodomites, are they "less evolved"?

    If liberals have no sense of humor, then Trump is definitely an intolerant liberal who cannot stand satire, suggested by his criticism of SNL. Perhaps what some find humorous others consider a thoughtless and hurtful misrepresentation of themselves? Is Trump "less evolved"?

    Delingpole's article is quite keen on de-humanizing liberals, the "less evolved" slur was bandied about by early Darwinists and eugenics supporters, suggesting non whites were "primitive" and thus inferior to whites. Now Delingpole's article says, "We're all equal and all have equal rights" but I question his commitment to such when he also claims liberals are "less evolved" which doesn't sound much like equal at all.. it also clashes violently with the "only white males can create and support civilization" sentiment voiced by Vox Day and similar.

    I get that Delingpole is trying to maintain morale of his followers whom he likens to an army, but it comes off as a tad peculiar to complain that liberals unjustly label conservatives as "heartless, uncaring, ruthless, evil people" while suggesting liberals are "less evolved", humorless and genocidal, seemingly providing good excuses for conservatives to behave badly. Who cares if we're cruel to "less evolved" beings? Vox Day, for instance, considers it a badge of honor.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Delingpole's first article is an amusing bit of mental masturbation for the alt-conservative self-esteem.

      A useless slur without content.

      ”The "white genocide" tweet is an example of how "ingrained the values of the left are in acadame"? No, it's an example of a despondent, probably intoxicated asshole running his mouth. If you want evidence of the saturation of liberal ideology in colleges, a study demonstrating that will be needed. Studies exist that suggest a liberal bias and show colleges would discriminate against conservative job candidates but I suppose even mentioning real evidence is boring and less interesting than generalizing the typical college liberal as being genocidal and anti-white. “

      And who will do such studies? Who remains that has not been assigned a Class by the Left, and who could possibly be unbiased? Certainly not the Leftist university professors, of which this man is just one example.

      ”Liberals brains are "less evolved"? How does he know this? Point and shriek tactics are used by the alt-right as are emotive pejoratives like "cuckservative".

      That is correct. So what? Is the description incorrect, in the same sense that calling half the nation racist, misogynist, uneducated, bitter clingers, etc.? I don’t agree with the “less evolved” assessment. It is readily apparent that Leftist brains are infected with either a disorder of low self-esteem in need of association with “elitism”, or with narcissism and faux elitism.

      ”These tactics are signs of a poor education, a lack of critical thinking or a "rebuke the other" mindset rather than a "less evolved brain". When a bible-thumping Christian conservative points and shrieks at a gay couple calling them sodomites, are they "less evolved"?

      First, that sort of Christian is a-biblical, uneducated biblically, and is NOT the norm but is the caricature of all Christians which the Left loves to hate. “Less evolved”? Certainly less able to tolerate outside the narrative – which is the actual character of the Leftist PC warrior. It is the PC, SJW who dominates these days, in academia, government, media, and now a great many infected organizations.

      Delete
  3. ”If liberals have no sense of humor, then Trump is definitely an intolerant liberal who cannot stand satire, suggested by his criticism of SNL. Perhaps what some find humorous others consider a thoughtless and hurtful misrepresentation of themselves? Is Trump "less evolved"?”

    You are really hurt by the possibility of being less evolved, that is clear. Keep in mind that the rationality of the theory of Evolution is highly questioned, not by the Left, but by the rational Constitutional, free speech defenders who stand up to the Left and its demand to toe their line or else.

    ”Delingpole's article is quite keen on de-humanizing liberals, the "less evolved" slur was bandied about by early Darwinists and eugenics supporters, suggesting non whites were "primitive" and thus inferior to whites.”

    And that atrocity was performed by turn of the century Progressives – Leftists, who felt their superiority sufficiently to assert life and death control over their inferiors: Class War a la Marx/Darwin. It is still preserved in the Leftist programs to support the Leftist ghetto/plantations which are necessary for the presumptive inferiors who cannot, after 150 years, assimilate or care for themselves. This was by design, that of LBJ, over 40 years ago.

    ”Now Delingpole's article says, "We're all equal and all have equal rights" but I question his commitment to such when he also claims liberals are "less evolved" which doesn't sound much like equal at all.”

    Here you confuse being equal in application of human Rights, to being equal in all other regards. No two people are equal in all regards, and no two groups of people are equal in all regards, and expecting that to be the case is mathematically and intellectually futile. Plus you are attacking just two of Delingpole’s sentences which sport two statements of evolution, and you are behaving as if he says “less evolved” in every paragraph and every sentence.

    ”it also clashes violently with the "only white males can create and support civilization" sentiment voiced by Vox Day and similar.”

    When other tribes do so, then they should be recognized as having done so. The tribalism of “white males” has been forced upon white males, who find it necessary to defend themselves against third wave feminist defamations. The feminist control of the Leftist narrative is far outweighed by any logic or evidence: it is purely weaponized tribalist, Marxist,Three-Class Warfare on selected classes of Others who are in the way of the messiah-Class takeover.

    I get that Delingpole is trying to maintain morale of his followers whom he likens to an army, but it comes off as a tad peculiar to complain that liberals unjustly label conservatives as "heartless, uncaring, ruthless, evil people" while suggesting liberals are "less evolved", humorless and genocidal, seemingly providing good excuses for conservatives to behave badly. Who cares if we're cruel to "less evolved" beings? Vox Day, for instance, considers it a badge of honor.”

    Playing nicey-nice with the avowed enemy is a fatal flaw in Class Warfare. When Normandy was breached in WWII, no prisoners were taken. None. When side A wants a war of destruction and annihilation of the Other, it must accept what that warfare means when it is brought back to them by side B. Whining about the use of their own tactics on themselves deserves ridicule (which is one of their tactics as well).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Finally, White Males didn't start this tribalist Class war; the Left did. White males are not a coherent, organized entity. But they are classified as Oppressor Class, merely due to their skin color, sex, and their successful creation of the western culture.

    A few females resent that they would have to compete head to head with males (of all colors) in order to achieve similar levels of accomplishment. They prefer to channel their resentment into destructive Class War, mis-defined as "justice" wherein they receive accolades, not for accomplishment, but for having destroyed those who have accomplished.

    They cannot destroy the Othered class which currently accomplishes, but they can destroy the youth via mal-education and psychological predation.

    They offer nothing in return. They grow fat on their "justice" war, and nothing more. They do not create, they only destroy, whine, and destroy more.

    That is not just despicable, it is an illness, an incompleteness, a psychological failure, a negative deviation from sanity, logic and evidence. Pure destruction which is couched as Justice, is an inversion of rationality, especially when it is not even just, it is merely destruction without any commensurate construction.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS comments and comments by banned parties will be deleted without being read.