The Way It Is

This is certainly a better division, because it puts most Repubican Cucks into the category where they belong: Globalists.

Consider globalism for a moment. First look at the globe, the nations which would have to be conquered. Look at their cultures and ask what culture would dominate under globalism? How would it be established? Under what Moral Law, Sharia? How will it feel to have your neighborhood patrolled by Sudanese and Liberian soldiers (looking for violations and equalization opportunities)?

Globalization is the objective, from Carter to the Clintons, Bushes, Obama, the entire Executive Branch of unelected dictators, half of Congress and roughly half of the Supreme Court and much or most of the federal court judiciaries.

Why? I can see two obvious reasons. First is increased power which they believe can enforce universal love and obedience in their utopia. Second, is that the tactic of "end justifies the means" supercedes all other moral principles, and the powerful can certainly agree on that principle.

The enemies then are free men, clustered in nations, given to free thought and free speech, and dedicated to the preservation of their intellectual and moral heritage.

So we are indeed separated into nationalist (preservationist) vs globalist (Conquistadors and moral dictators).