Whoopi is a rape-apologist, one of the worst. Is she possibly complicit somehow?
Five more women come forward to accuse Roman Polanski of sexual assault - including one who says she was just nine when he attacked her
Five more women say Polanski, now 84, attacked them between 1969 and 1976
One says he fondled her under the table at a dinner party with Jack Nicholson
She says she was 15 when the 1976 alleged attack happened in Gstaad
Their claims bring the total number of women to accuse him of assault to 10
In 1977, he attacked 13-year-old Samantha Geimer who he drugged and raped
He went on the run in 1978 to avoid being jailed for it and remains a fugitive
Four others previously said the film director attacked them in the 60s, 70s and 80s
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Well, Whoopi: Was This Rape-Rape Or Not??
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment