A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Actually this lawsuit is James Hansen's attempt to regain the spotlight for himself. Hansen has declared himself the "guardian of future generations", bringing this suit in their behalf. Hansen was the Chicken Little of NASA infamy. On top of unprovable claims for the year 2100, Hansen will have no standing in terms of harms, which are unprovable software models and not materially real. When he loses this frivolous court case he should be forced to pay court costs, attorney fees, etc. so that the taxpayer doesn't have to pay for his windmill tilting.