A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Friday, December 10, 2010
The Science is Settled...?
One of the top factors in the AGW question is the issue of clouds and how much energy they reflect vs. how much they absorb, as well as whether clouds will increase or decrease if warming happens. For the state of that science, see this article in Reason.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
If anyone said it was "settled", they were referring to CO2 being the dominating factor since 1980.
Unsettled is still how much warming, the effects of that warming, and what, if anything, to do about it.
Post a Comment