Think of it: What character trait is today nearly-universally held to be the greatest virtue? Which trait is most praised? The absence of which trait is loathed most deeply and punished most harshly?He moves on to a conclusion which is taut and cutting; read the whole thing.
Tolerance, of course.
It does go by other names: nonjudgmentalism, openness, diversity, anti-racism, etc. But whatever it’s called, the supreme virtue of the modern age is not to believe.
Not to believe that one’s people are good and therefore one should be loyal to them. Not to believe that there is one true religion not only for us but also foreigners. [Hey, if it’s true, it’s true.] Not to believe that there are proper ways to love and marry, not just for me but for all. Not to believe that some things are beautiful and others are ugly. Not to believe that proper standards of decency ought to be enforced. Etc.
[It’s true that the authorities always act as if they believe some things. It’s impossible for an individual to live, or for a nation to exist, without at least acting as if certain things are true. But nowadays you’re not allowed to state openly that certain things are true and that you are acting accordingly. If you do, you’re a “bigot.”]
And this is generally the ethos of today’s atheist. He usually says that, sure, there might be a God. But I see no good evidence. So I remain skeptical. I won’t say for sure that God doesn’t exist, but I just won’t believe it. Today’s atheism reinforces and is reinforced by the spirit of the times.
And, naturally, the atheist regards his worldview as the best. The one that everyone ought to embrace if we are to make a better world. Let’s all stop fighting over Flying Spaghetti Monsters who don’t really exist and get on with living the good life of skepticism, tolerance, and live-and-let-live.
Except that human life doesn’t actually work that way.
In order to achieve anything great, and to insure the continuation of his people in the midst of a hostile world, a man (and a nation) needs certainty about some things. And the most important thing to be certain about is that your life makes sense at a deep level. That you are not just thrown into existence for no reason and then snuffed out utterly a few decades later for no reason either.
A man also needs the confident belief that he and his people are basically good. Only then will he be willing to exert himself, and sometimes deny himself, in order to protect someone other than himself.
But atheism is based on a skepticism that dissolves this confidence. It does so in individuals and nations. Told to be tolerant, told that nonjudgmentalism is the greatest good, told that reality itself is equal and indeterminate, threatened with punishment if he acts as if his people and his religion are actually good, the modern man shrinks back into skepticism and solipsism.
Therefore Western nations lack the will to defend themselves against any but the most crude and obvious physical threats. We allow foreigners to colonize our lands. We allow our children to forget the ways of our ancestors. We allow disorder and rebellion because we don’t want to deny anyone their civil rights. And so on.
All this is the predictable result of widespread skepticism. If God doesn’t exist, I’m on my own. And even if God just probably doesn’t exist, what difference would it make even if he does? After all, so this line of thought goes, a real God would make his presence known, but no such God has made himself known to me. Either way, with no (real) God out there, I cannot look to him to set things right. All I can do is make my brief existence as pleasant as possible. No sense sticking my neck out.
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Saturday, May 10, 2014
An Exceptional Post At Orthosphere
From Alan Roebuck, Atheism, Agnosticism and Cultural Low Self-esteem, an excerpt:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2006/04/24/lightning-kills-five-children-decorating-metal-cross-in-mexico/
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-25/pope-john-paul-ii-crucifix-crushes-man-to-death-in-cevo-italy/5411980
Five children killed by lightning while decorating a Christian cross!!??
Praise Jeeezuus!!!!!!! Praise his holy name!!!!!
A huge crucifix of Jesus falls and kills.....an atheist?
No. A young Catholic man!!!!!!!
Goddamn but I love Jesus' sense of humor!!!!! Don't you!!?
Jesus, you you are one bitchin' savior!!!
But what a shame it couldn't have been Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham.
Now THAT might cause me to rethink the credibility of the Christian God!!!!!!!!!!!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!'
Your theology is seriously juvenile.
Yet, I doubt that you actually think that Christians or Jews (or Muslims for that matter) make any claim that the God of the Bible has any intention of protecting them from the hazards of living in the universe.
Your only intent here is to present your schoolyard gloating over the mishaps which have befallen your hated category of humanity.
Your blind and irrational hatred will ultimately consume you, and it looks close to having done so already, since you revel in the deaths of the Other, and wish for more gleefully, childishly. You might want to get some emotional help, not to mention intellectual assistance with actual theology. I could help you with your logical failures, if you actually want help (it appears that you are reaching out by your erratic and antisocial behavior).
Or he's a troll with time on his hands. Come to think of it, that's all most of them seem to have.
His theology is cherry-picked to suit his ego. He does not even rise to the level of a genuine skeptic, and I doubt he's interested in learning the truth.
The truth is whatever he says, for as long as he says it.
Let him go. I am surprised you did not scrog his antics from the get-go.
But atheism is based on a skepticism that dissolves this confidence
Atheists are supposed to live in a state of perpetual doubt,where no certainty,trust,hope and confidence is allowed to be entertained.Instead of producing truth-seekers, atheism produces pathological skeptics.
It might be interesting (perhaps) if "kilo papa" actually came up with something original. Instead, there is a mere repetition of previous juvenile attempts posting to this blog, trying to shock and offend with profanity and obscenities, using exactly the same tropes as previously. It might rise to the level of being offensive, if it were not so ludicrous that it cannot be taken seriously.
Like, dude, it's like so B-O-R-I-N-G!
I'd place kilo at about the 5th grade level, both emotionally and intellectually, with his age older than that, possibly 16 or so.
Judging from his penname and behavior, it appears that he suffers from the drug syndrome which stops emotional growth at the level it was at the start of drug use. The drug user doesn't progress emotionally beyond that level until drug use is stopped, and possibly not even then. So for some, emotional maturity is reached very late in life to never.
The same goes for intellectual progress for certain addictions, such as addiction to hatred, in this case hatred of Christianity (which is not an actual basic necessary position of Atheism, but is one cause for Atheism).
I'll leave this rant up, but his future contributions of this nature will be deleted.
Post a Comment