A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I'm amazed, Stan: how could you miss the truth of "the deeply nuanced" statement by one of the brightest intellectuals to ever graduate from an Ivy League school with a "D" average?
Consider this:
". . .climate change is "violently affecting communities" worldwide. . ."
That is a true statement! You just have not applied Islamic taqiyya and kitman in order to make it "true."
The "climate change" is the change in climate required to appease violent (Rhetorical question: is there any other kind?) Islamists. In order to effect that "climate change," violent Islamists are committing acts of terrorism against their host communities, thereby violently affecting those communities. Q.E.D.
See? Easy-peasy, when you apply the Islamist and AtheoLeftist viewpoint to the situation.
Nothing to see here; no reason to send any administration representative to Paris for a false show of "solidarity" against the barbarous practices of the peaceful adherents of the "religion of peace." Just shut your blasphemous mouth and go along with the program, and you too can enjoy freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom from violence.
Otherwise: WE WILL KILL YOU!
I just failed to see that for some reason; but now I understand. I feel somehow... enlightened! Thanks!
Post a Comment