"Surprised because we didn’t vet a terrorist? Hell, we did not vet a president."Well, some of us did.
Don Surber, quoted at Instapundit
A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy.
***
If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value?
***
If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic?
***
Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The information about PBHO (PBUH) past (college transcripts, travel records, etc.) has been sealed from public scrutiny. It's as if the information does NOT exist.
The same is true of the information needed to vet potential ISIS infiltrators through the immigration process. The information required for vetting is either not available (war-torn countries have a very difficult time maintaining tabs on the bad guys and gals), or it is intentionally distorted to provide cover to the sleepers.
So how did that very strong vetting process work in the case of PBHO (PBUH)?
It was no less (and no more) effective than the vetting process that is supposed to stop Islamic terrorists from getting inside the walls via the immigration process.
Walls? WHAT walls?!? We don't even have a border!
Post a Comment