A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Actually this might be the desired consequent of Cloward-Piven. The destruction of the (faux) democracy systems subject to the EU dictatorship has been the goal of Leftists/Progressives/Socialists from the beginning. Hatred of the west and Christianity, coupled with love for Islam and Muslims, has produced the effect the Left desired and which they now live with. So those subjected to the unrelenting EU totalitarian PC have the further option of fleeing. Maybe Viet Nam? Where can they flee to?
Is it "Who ya gonna call?" Or "Where ya gonna run to"? Of course, 400 jihadis would statistically kill only 8,000 to 12,000 people; so your likelihood is... well, you know, worth it to the Islamophiles.