Saturday, August 20, 2016

Sheriff Joe Under Attack From Federal Court

Federal judge refers Sheriff Joe Arpaio for criminal contempt
Inside the article we find this:
"The group took time for a moment of celebration but quickly transitioned to remind supporters of the pain Arapio has caused their community and encouraged them to band together to ensure he will be prosecuted, convicted and forced out of office."
The sheriff has caused pain for their community? How so? Not until the very end do we find this:
"Noemi Romero, 24, was one of nine workers arrested in January 2013 after Maricopa County sheriff’s deputies raided Lam’s Supermarket, an Asian grocery store in Phoenix, looking for undocumented workers who were using other people’s Social Security numbers.

The name and Social Security number Romero was using belonged to her mother. She pleaded guilty to a felony charge of criminal impersonation. The felony conviction ruined her chances of applying for a federal program that allows undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to receive protection from deportation and a work permit. Romero was brought to the U.S. from Mexico when she was 3.

“When that happened to me, it was not just I that suffered, but my whole family suffered,” Romero said.

Romero spent three months and a week in jail.

She said of Arpaio, “I hope he does go to jail and is treated the way all these other people have been treated.”
It certainly appears that by enforcing the law, Sheriff Joe has indeed caused pain for willful lawbreakers. But the lawbreakers are Victimhood Class members, so the ACLU and Leftist Messiah activists must provide salvation by punishing their Oppressor, who (OMG!) enforced the law. Enforcing the law on Victimhood Class members is just not done these days. It is immoral, or something. Maybe even illegal... "hate crime"?

Why do we even have laws? Are laws just for whites? Non-Leftist whites? Will whites begin to understand that laws don't apply to anyone any more, including whites (Hillary is white, right?). Well, actually laws are just for the Oppressor Class, not for anyone who is Righteously Leftist and Progressing toward official anarchy of the Righteous Classes.

Oddly, though, the Oppressor Class is mostly law-abiding anyway, so the laws are not even needed for the most part. Except of course for the Hate Crime laws, of course, which protect the Victimhood Classes - apparently even from being subjected to the law.

If it weren't for internal contradiction, there would be no logic in Leftism at all.


Steven Satak said...

With Hispanics, and nearly every other culture ever touched by the Spanish, it is ALL about ego: spiritual pride runs deep in their culture, and to this day the ideal way for a man of that culture to live is become a hidalgo.

Inflated sense of self, entitlement, arrogance and at the same time a steadfast refusal to be anything but a well-dressed drone. They scratch like mountain lions, but bleed at a touch. Just like this woman - AND her whole family.

Call me raciss all you like. Observed facts are what they are. I live with a Filipina and, they having been contaminated in the past by the Spanish, am familiar with the culture and its sad shortcomings.

But you know, it dovetails right into what the Left has going on right now, the fragmenting of our society as more and more people are encouraged to see themselves as Victims. Nothing feeds a man's (or woman's) ego like getting a leg over someone else while doing them an injury. It's the hidalgo way of living.

Hunter said...

Arpaio himself is a criminal. I can't believe anyone defends this evil thug. I've never liked people who set out to make the world worse. People who search for people weaker than them and try and make their lives worse.

Stan said...

Empty accusations, unless you can back them up. Arpaio enforces the laws that are on the books; Lefties hate that. What have you got that proves otherwise? If Sheriff Joe is a criminal, what criminal law did he break while "making their lives worse"? When was he convicted, in order to be determined a "criminal"?