Mathematical Error In Climate Models?

What we know for certain is that (a) data must be manipulated in order to fit the curve; (b) the temperature hiatus is now long enough to have been predictable, if the models were accurate; (c) models do not sufficiently represent the feedback effects of El Nino, nor the actual increased production of polar ice, and its subsequent influence; (d) denial of significance of solar influence is fatal flaw. Extrapolation of annual data into next-year, single-year data while denying the annual granularity of "climate change" is intellectually dishonest, and reflects on the quality of the non-falsifiable "science".