A former 40 year Atheist analyzes Atheism, without resorting to theism, deism, or fantasy. *** If You Don't Value Truth, Then What DO You Value? *** If we say that the sane can be coaxed and persuaded to rationality, and we say that rationality presupposes logic, then what can we say of those who actively reject logic? *** Atheists have an obligation to give reasons in the form of logic and evidence for rejecting Theist theories.
Michael Tracy vigorously denies that he supports what he writes. Apparently it's just a fantasy, or maybe it's a plan for someone else - who Tracy would vigorously deny that he supports, or maybe... maybe Tracy is a wannabe militant revolutionary in the cowardly mode of faux Che Guevarraism. Who can say precisely why this sort of violent, anti-constitutional, appeal to armed Coup would be written and posted by a Leftist? Well, I for one can say this: Tracy is a potential criminally-defective terrorist insurrectionist whose instability should be monitored. Advocating for the violent overthrow of legally elected government is treason, even if it is clumsily disguised with disclaimers which are obviously inserted for self-protection, not because they are true.